IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v26y2024i65p106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Antecedents of Artificial Intelligence Products’ Usage. The Case of Business Students

Author

Listed:
  • Rodney Duffett

    (Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa)

  • Rodica Milena Zaharia

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Tudor Edu

    (Romanian-American University, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Raluca Constantinescu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Costel Negricea

    (Romanian-American University, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

This study aims to investigate to what extent facilitating conditions (those means that users consider necessary to use for a certain technology) and other predictors (perceived risk and lack of trust in technology, gender, education, income, technology proficiency and equipment used to access the Internet) influence the use of Artificial Intelligence Products (AIP) in general and for education. Using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), the data collected, through an online questionnaire from a sample of 450 Romanian business students, were examined using principal component analysis (PCA) and logistic regression. Facilitating conditions indicated a direct effect (positive) on the dependent variables, and the combination between perceived risk and perceived lack of trust in technology displayed an opposite effect (negative) on the dependent variables. Female students showed a greater tendency to use AIPs in general and for education. Undergraduate students were more inclined to use AIPs in general. Students not using smartwatches or personal computers are inclined to use AIPs more in general and for education. This study advances the theory by exploring the actual use of AIPs for educational purposes, developing the UTAUT model by isolating facilitating conditions and using descriptive variables as predictors. At the same time, the present research contributes to enriching the empirical evidence related to UTAUT on the acceptance and use of technology in Romania. The results of the research allow for the formulation of practical recommendations for universities as current and potential providers of AIPs in order to make the educational process more efficient.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodney Duffett & Rodica Milena Zaharia & Tudor Edu & Raluca Constantinescu & Costel Negricea, 2024. "Exploring the Antecedents of Artificial Intelligence Products’ Usage. The Case of Business Students," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 26(65), pages 106-106, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:26:y:2024:i:65:p:106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_3282.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robinson, Stephen Cory, 2020. "Trust, transparency, and openness: How inclusion of cultural values shapes Nordic national public policy strategies for artificial intelligence (AI)," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    2. Du, Shuili & Xie, Chunyan, 2021. "Paradoxes of artificial intelligence in consumer markets: Ethical challenges and opportunities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 961-974.
    3. Alina Iorga Pisica & Tudor Edu & Rodica Milena Zaharia & Razvan Zaharia, 2023. "Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Pros and Cons from the Perspectives of Academics," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-13, May.
    4. Bernd Schmitt, 2019. "From Atoms to Bits and Back: A Research Curation on Digital Technology and Agenda for Future Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(4), pages 825-832.
    5. Gansser, Oliver Alexander & Reich, Christina Stefanie, 2021. "A new acceptance model for artificial intelligence with extensions to UTAUT2: An empirical study in three segments of application," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    6. Scott Thiebes & Sebastian Lins & Ali Sunyaev, 2021. "Trustworthy artificial intelligence," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(2), pages 447-464, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rongbin Yang & Santoso Wibowo, 2022. "User trust in artificial intelligence: A comprehensive conceptual framework," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2053-2077, December.
    2. Zhang, Weidong & Zuo, Na & He, Wu & Li, Songtao & Yu, Lu, 2021. "Factors influencing the use of artificial intelligence in government: Evidence from China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    3. Leah Warfield Smith & Randall Lee Rose & Alex R. Zablah & Heath McCullough & Mohammad “Mike” Saljoughian, 2023. "Examining post-purchase consumer responses to product automation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 530-550, May.
    4. Aubel Martin & Pikturniene Indre & Joye Yannick, 2022. "Risk Perception and Risk Behavior in Response to Service Robot Anthropomorphism in Banking," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 30(2), pages 26-42, June.
    5. Wilson, Christopher & van der Velden, Maja, 2022. "Sustainable AI: An integrated model to guide public sector decision-making," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    6. Cloarec, Julien, 2022. "Privacy controls as an information source to reduce data poisoning in artificial intelligence-powered personalization," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 144-153.
    7. Govindan, Kannan & Kannan, Devika & Jørgensen, Thomas Ballegård & Nielsen, Tim Straarup, 2022. "Supply Chain 4.0 performance measurement: A systematic literature review, framework development, and empirical evidence," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    8. König, Pascal D. & Wenzelburger, Georg, 2021. "The legitimacy gap of algorithmic decision-making in the public sector: Why it arises and how to address it," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    9. Chen, Xun-Qi & Ma, Chao-Qun & Ren, Yi-Shuai & Lei, Yu-Tian & Huynh, Ngoc Quang Anh & Narayan, Seema, 2023. "Explainable artificial intelligence in finance: A bibliometric review," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    10. Nicoleta Samarescu & Robert Bumbac & Alin Zamfiroiu & Maria-Cristina Iorgulescu, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence in Education: Next-Gen Teacher Perspectives," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 26(65), pages 145-145, February.
    11. William Fritz & Rhonda Hadi & Andrew Stephen, 2023. "From tablet to table: How augmented reality influences food desirability," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 503-529, May.
    12. Sharifpour Hojatallah & Ghaseminezhad Yaser & Hashemi-Tabatabaei Mohammad & Amiri Maghsoud, 2022. "Investigating cause-and-effect relationships between supply chain 4.0 technologies," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 14(4), pages 22-46, December.
    13. Afshan Younas & Kabaly P Subramanian & Mohammed Al-Haziazi & Syed Sadullah Hussainy & Ahmed Nasser Salem Al Kindi, 2023. "A Review on Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Education," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(8), pages 1092-1100, August.
    14. Alexandra Brintrup & George Baryannis & Ashutosh Tiwari & Svetan Ratchev & Giovanna Martinez-Arellano & Jatinder Singh, 2023. "Trustworthy, responsible, ethical AI in manufacturing and supply chains: synthesis and emerging research questions," Papers 2305.11581, arXiv.org.
    15. Prikshat, Verma & Islam, Mohammad & Patel, Parth & Malik, Ashish & Budhwar, Pawan & Gupta, Suraksha, 2023. "AI-Augmented HRM: Literature review and a proposed multilevel framework for future research," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    16. Stock-Homburg, Ruth & Kirchhoff, Jérôme & Heinisch, Judith S. & Ebert, Andreas & Busch, Philip & Rawal, Niyati & David, Klaus & Wendt, Janine & Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Indra & Stryk, Oskar von & Hannig, 2022. "Responsible Human-Robot Interaction with Anthropomorphic Service Robots: State of the Art of an Interdisciplinary Research Challenge," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 130084, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    17. Jinjin Wang & Jiadi Yang, 2022. "Culture shaping and value realization of digital media art under Internet+," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(3), pages 1124-1133, December.
    18. Hoyer, Wayne D. & Kroschke, Mirja & Schmitt, Bernd & Kraume, Karsten & Shankar, Venkatesh, 2020. "Transforming the Customer Experience Through New Technologies," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 57-71.
    19. Dominik M. Piehlmaier, 2022. "Overconfidence and the adoption of robo-advice: why overconfident investors drive the expansion of automated financial advice," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-24, December.
    20. Volkmar, Gioia & Fischer, Peter M. & Reinecke, Sven, 2022. "Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: Exploring drivers, barriers, and future developments in marketing management," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 599-614.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Artificial Intelligence (AI); Artificial Intelligence Product (AIP); business students; Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT); principal component analysis (PCA); logistic regression; Romania.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • C51 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Construction and Estimation
    • C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:26:y:2024:i:65:p:106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.