IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adp/jgjorm/v4y2018i1p1-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trends in Contraceptive Use and Method Mix from Equity Perspective in the Past Two Decades: Evidence from Two East Indian States

Author

Listed:
  • Ranjan Kumar Prusty

    (IIHMR University, India)

  • Amit Bhanot

    (Project Director and Senior Regional Health Advisor for Asia and Africa at Palladium, India)

  • Hanimi Reddy

    (M& E expert save the children, India)

  • Ranjan Kumar Panda

    (State team leader at Palladium, India)

Abstract

mix is a key determinant of the fertility impact of contraceptive practices; the use of effective and right methods by couples can produce a greater decline in fertility than use of less effective methods. The present paper tries to understand contraceptive use with a special focus on spacing methods in the state of Bihar and Odisha during 1992-2014. Indian National Family Health Surveys (NFHS) of 1992-93, 1998-99 and 2005-06 and project Ujjwal Survey data (2014) in Bihar and Odisha were used in the analyses. Data on currently married fecund women were used for the present study. Both bivariate and multivariate analysis was used to understand the changes in different methods and factors associated with the methods. The results show there is an increase in contraceptive prevalence rate both nationally (1992-2006) and in both the states (1992-2014). The share of sterilization has increased in the high fertility state of Bihar whereas it has gone down in moderate fertility state of Odisha. There is a steady increase in short-term modern methods in Odisha largely contributing to its increase in contraceptive prevalence whereas in Bihar the spacing methods don’t show a clear pattern. The multivariate analysis shows the predicated probability of using modern spacing method is lowest among Muslims, Poor and older women in both the states in both the states after adjusting socio-economic variables. This paper brought the significance of method-mix in contraceptive prevalence in the states. The initiatives by NGOs and experiments with public-private partnerships are one of the leading contributors to increase in spacing methods. The social marketing and social franchising of selected reproductive health services by project Ujjwal is one such example. Similar initiatives on prioritizing spacing methods in family planning may be successful in improving access to contraceptive in Bihar.

Suggested Citation

  • Ranjan Kumar Prusty & Amit Bhanot & Hanimi Reddy & Ranjan Kumar Panda, 2018. "Trends in Contraceptive Use and Method Mix from Equity Perspective in the Past Two Decades: Evidence from Two East Indian States," Global Journal of Reproductive Medicine, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 4(1), pages 1-9, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:adp:jgjorm:v:4:y:2018:i:1:p:1-9
    DOI: 10.19080/GJORM.2018.04.555626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://juniperpublishers.com/gjorm/pdf/GJORM.MS.ID.555626.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://juniperpublishers.com/gjorm/GJORM.MS.ID.555626.php
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.19080/GJORM.2018.04.555626?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emmanuela Gakidou & Effy Vayena, 2007. "Use of Modern Contraception by the Poor Is Falling Behind," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(2), pages 1-9, February.
    2. Mark Montgomery & Michele Gragnolati & Kathleen Burke & Edmundo Paredes, 2000. "Measuring living standards with proxy variables," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 37(2), pages 155-174, May.
    3. Filmer, Deon & King, Elizabeth M. & Pritchett, Lant, 1998. "Gender disparity in South Asia : comparisons between and within countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1867, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Filmer, Deon, 2000. "The structure of social disparities in education : gender and wealth," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2268, The World Bank.
    2. MATTHEW McCARTNEY & AISHA GILL, 2007. "From South Asia to Diaspora: Missing Women and Migration," Working Papers 152, Department of Economics, SOAS University of London, UK.
    3. Ravi Prakash & Abhishek Singh, 2014. "Who Marries Whom? Changing Mate Selection Preferences in Urban India and Emerging Implications on Social Institutions," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 33(2), pages 205-227, April.
    4. Samia Badji, 2016. "The Wealth Paradox for Whom? Child Labor and the Identification of Households Excluded from the Land and the Labor Markets in Madagascar," Post-Print halshs-01421488, HAL.
    5. M. Browne & G.F. Ortmann & S.L. Hendriks, 2014. "Developing a resilience indicator for food security monitoring and evaluation: Index construction and household classification for six African countries," Agrekon, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(3), pages 31-56, September.
    6. Ranjan Ray & Kompal Sinha, 2015. "Multidimensional Deprivation in China, India and Vietnam: A Comparative Study on Micro Data," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 69-93, February.
    7. Barik, Debasis & Desai, Sonalde & Vanneman, Reeve, 2018. "Economic Status and Adult Mortality in India: Is the Relationship Sensitive to Choice of Indicators?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 176-187.
    8. World Bank, 2005. "Pakistan : Country Gender Assessment, Bridging the Gender Gap, Opportunities and Challenges," World Bank Publications - Reports 8453, The World Bank Group.
    9. Kamakura, Wagner A. & Mazzon, Jose A., 2013. "Socioeconomic status and consumption in an emerging economy," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 4-18.
    10. Janina Isabel Steinert & Lucie Dale Cluver & G. J. Melendez-Torres & Sebastian Vollmer, 2018. "One Size Fits All? The Validity of a Composite Poverty Index Across Urban and Rural Households in South Africa," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 51-72, February.
    11. Kinyondo, Abel Alfred & Ntegwa, Magashi Joseph & Masawe, Cresencia Apolinary, 2022. "Socioeconomic Inequality in Maternal Healthcare Services: The Case of Tanzania," African Journal of Economic Review, African Journal of Economic Review, vol. 10(1), January.
    12. Pritha Dev & Blessing U. Mberu & Roland Pongou, 2016. "Ethnic Inequality: Theory and Evidence from Formal Education in Nigeria," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 64(4), pages 603-660.
    13. Hoda El Enbaby & Rami Galal, 2015. "Inequality of Opportunity in Individuals' Wages and Households' Assets in Egypt," Working Papers 942, Economic Research Forum, revised Sep 2015.
    14. Joseph, Magashi & Miho, Asela, 2020. "Household Socioeconomic Status and Health Care Demand for Childhood Fever and Diarrhea in Tanzania," African Journal of Economic Review, African Journal of Economic Review, vol. 8(3), November.
    15. Muhammad Jami Husain, 2013. "Life Expectancy and Economic Well-being: A Within-country Regional-level Analysis Using the Micro-data of Bangladesh," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 7(4), pages 443-474, November.
    16. Carlo Azzarri & Gero Carletto & Benjamin Davis & Alberto Zezza, 2006. "Monitoring Poverty Without Consumption Data : An Application Using the Albania Panel Survey," Eastern European Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(1), pages 59-82, February.
    17. Assaad, Ragui & Hendy, Rana & Salehi-Isfahani, Djavad, 2019. "Inequality of opportunity in educational attainment in the Middle East and North Africa: Evidence from household surveys," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 24-43.
    18. Sabina Alkire & Maria Emma Santos, 2010. "Acute Multidimensional Poverty: A New Index for Developing Countries," Human Development Research Papers (2009 to present) HDRP-2010-11, Human Development Report Office (HDRO), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).
    19. Permanyer, Iñaki, 2013. "Using Census Data to Explore the Spatial Distribution of Human Development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 1-13.
    20. P. Jenkins, Stephen & Micklewright, John, 2007. "New directions in the analysis of inequality and poverty," ISER Working Paper Series 2007-11, Institute for Social and Economic Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adp:jgjorm:v:4:y:2018:i:1:p:1-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Thomas (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.