IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adm/journl/v9y2020i10p45-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Leadership on Employees’ Loyalty and on Organizational Success: Do Transformational and Transactional Leadership Ensure Organizational and Work Commitment?

Author

Listed:
  • Panagiota Xanthopoulou
  • Ioannis Dimitrios Karampelas

Abstract

Leadership issues are vital to organizational success (Kumar and Kaptan, 2007). Without a strategic and effective leadership, it is difficult for the members of the organization to maintain profitability, productivity and competitive advantage (Lussier and Achua, 2007). Work commitment is important for understanding employee work behavior (Mowday et al., 1979; Meyer and Herscovitch 2001; Meyer et al. 2002). This commitment has an impact on many work-related characteristics, such as the intention to stay in the business (Porter et al. 1974; Mathieu and Zajac 1990; Meyer et al. 2002; Chew and Chan 2008), the absence (Porter et al. . 1974; Angle and Perry 1981; Meyer et al. 2002), and satisfaction (Yousef, 2000; Meyer et al., 2002; Chughtai and Zafar, 2006). The purpose of the research is to describe how leadership affects work commitment and employee effectiveness in a business. The target of the research is to examine which of the two transformational and transactional leadership styles has the most significant impact on employee engagement and employee effectiveness. In this research, an in-depth examination of the concepts of leadership, leadership style and work commitment was first conducted. The actions taken to investigate the research problem and the reasoning behind the application of specific procedures or techniques used to locate, select, process, and analyze the information used to understand the problem were then described, thus allowing the reader to critically evaluate the overall validity and reliability of the study. The interview questions were then taken and a comparison was made between the answers to give the results of the research. The results were also discussed to find homogenizations or contradictions in the existing literature review. Finally, the findings of the research were reported and suggestions for future research were made. The results showed that transformational leadership can lead to job commitment and better long-term effort, creativity and productivity of employees. On the contrary, the leadership of the transaction cannot cause a work commitment, but it is observed that on the part of the employees it can cause better results in a short period of time. Combined, transformational and transactional leadership can lead to job commitment, better results on the part of employees in the short term, and better long-term effort, creativity and productivity of employees.

Suggested Citation

  • Panagiota Xanthopoulou & Ioannis Dimitrios Karampelas, 2020. "The Impact of Leadership on Employees’ Loyalty and on Organizational Success: Do Transformational and Transactional Leadership Ensure Organizational and Work Commitment?," International Journal of Sciences, Office ijSciences, vol. 9(10), pages 45-63, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:adm:journl:v:9:y:2020:i:10:p:45-63
    DOI: 10.18483/ijSci.2389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ijsciences.com/pub/article/2389
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.ijsciences.com/pub/pdf/V92020102389.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18483/ijSci.2389?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ilzar Daud, 2019. "The Relationship between Leadership Style and Employee Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Organizational Commitment," GATR Journals jmmr215, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    2. Blomme, Robert J. & Kodden, Bas & Beasley-Suffolk, Annamaria, 2015. "Leadership theories and the concept of work engagement: Creating a conceptual framework for management implications and research," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 125-144, March.
    3. Janet Chew & Christopher C.A. Chan, 2008. "Human resource practices, organizational commitment and intention to stay," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(6), pages 503-522, September.
    4. U. D. Abasilim & D. E. Gberevbie & O. A. Osibanjo, 2019. "Leadership Styles and Employees’ Commitment: Empirical Evidence From Nigeria," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdul Kadar Muhammad Masum & Md Abul Kalam Azad & Loo-See Beh, 2015. "Determinants of Academics' Job Satisfaction: Empirical Evidence from Private Universities in Bangladesh," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Naveed R Khan & Marinah Awang & Che Mohd Zulkifli, 2013. "Enhancing HR Outcomes through Best HR Practices and Organisational Commitment: A Conceptual Schema for SMEs," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 4(1), pages 24-32, January.
    3. Prince Enwereji & M. Potgieter, 2022. "Strategic Leadership Qualities to Enhance the Payment Culture for Municipal Services within an African Context," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 12(3), pages 10-17, May.
    4. Behl, Abhishek & Jayawardena, Nirma & Ishizaka, Alessio & Gupta, Manish & Shankar, Amit, 2022. "Gamification and gigification: A multidimensional theoretical approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1378-1393.
    5. Celestina Ekene Chukwudi & Daniel Eseme Gberevbie & Ugochukwu David Abasilim & David Imhonopi, 2019. "IPOB Agitations for Self-Determination and the Response of the Federal Government of Nigeria: Implications for Political Stability," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 8, November.
    6. Harjit Sekhon & Andrews Agya Yalley & Sanjit Kumar Roy & Gurvinder Singh Shergill, 2016. "A cross-country study of service productivity," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5-6), pages 223-238, April.
    7. Smart A. Sarpong & Mary Safowah Akom & Emelia Kusi-Owusu & Irene Ofosua-Adjei & Youngjo Lee, 2021. "The Role of Commitment in the Relationship between Components of Organizational Culture and Intention to Stay," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Tadesse Beyene Okbagaber, 2019. "The Effect of Human Resources Management on Employees Retention in IBM Corporation," Journal of Asian Business Strategy, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(2), pages 158-173, December.
    9. Muhamad Dzahir Kasa & Muhamad Fahmi Shamsuddin & Mohd Faiz Mohd Yaakob & Mat Rahimi Yusof & Fatimah Noor Rashidah Mohd Sofian, 2020. "Exploring the Influence of a Principal’s Internalized Moral Perspective towards Teacher Commitment in Malaysian Secondary Schools," Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 7(3), pages 323-333.
    10. Olawumi Dele Awolusi & Shirley Shamen Jayakody, 2022. "Exploring the Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Employee's Retention: Evidence from the Food and Beverage Industry in the State of Qatar," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 12(4), pages 39-58.
    11. Vishal Gupta & Shailendra Singh & Abhijit Bhattacharya, 2017. "The Relationships Between Leadership, Work Engagement And Employee Innovative Performance: Empirical Evidence From The Indian R&D Context," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(07), pages 1-30, October.
    12. Kyomuhangi Speria & Kanyesigye Stella T & Ruteraho Agatha H, 2023. "Relationship Between Leadership Styles And Teacher Commitment Among Secondary Schools In Uganda," Working papers 2023-46-01, Voice of Research.
    13. Muhammad Asif & Miao Qing & Jinsoo Hwang & Hao Shi, 2019. "Ethical Leadership, Affective Commitment, Work Engagement, and Creativity: Testing a Multiple Mediation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-16, August.
    14. Stella & Sperial, 2022. "Effect Of Head Teachers’ Leadership Styles On Commitment Of Teachers Among Secondary Schools In Uganda," Working papers 2022-42-01, Voice of Research.
    15. Nguyen Hai Thanh & Nguyen Van Quang, 2022. "Transformational, Transactional, Laissez-faire Leadership Styles and Employee Engagement: Evidence From Vietnam’s Public Sector," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    16. Siti Zubaidah Othman & Syahrulniza Anak Lembang, 2017. "What Attract Gen Y to Stay in Organization? HR Practices, Organizational Support or Leadership Style," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(2), pages 1-9.
    17. Zubair Nawaz & Jing Zhang & Rafiq Mansoor & Aboobucker Ilmudeen, 2019. "Gig workers in sharing economy: Conceptualizing Freelancer Value Proposition (FVP) in e-lancing platforms," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 9(6), pages 1-5.
    18. Mai Ngoc Khuong & Do Thanh Tung & Thai Hoang Quoc, 2022. "Review of Empirical Research on Leadership and Firm Performance," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, July.
    19. Hamed Al-sharafi* & Mohd Ezani Mat Hassan & Syed Shah Alam, 2018. "The Effect of Training and Career Development on Employees Retention –A Study on the Telecommunication Organizations in Yemen," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 420-430:2.
    20. Daniel RUSU, 2021. "STRATEGIES, ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT AND LEADERSHIP STYLES IN SMEs," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(4), pages 31-49, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adm:journl:v:9:y:2020:i:10:p:45-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Staff ijSciences The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Staff ijSciences to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.