IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v27y2023i21562.html

Information Transparency, Location, and Stakeholder Pressure on the Socially Responsible Partner Selection

Author

Listed:
  • Rosana da Rosa Portella Tondolo
  • Juliana Bonomi Santos
  • Vilmar Antonio Gonçalves Tondolo
  • Ely Paiva

Abstract

Objective: the purpose of this paper is to explore the effect of information transparency on the selection of a socially responsible partner, taking into account the role played by signal send by the location of the partner and stakeholder pressure. Theoretical approach: this study is based on the premise that information transparency is a central element in the buyer-supply relationship and can play a key role in the selection of a socially responsible partner. The location of a partner can also affect the feeling of transparency if the country where the partner is located is not recognized for its reputation. The stakeholder pressure for socially responsible practices can also affect the decision to choose a business partner. Methods: we employed a 2 x 2 full-factorial between-subjects, scenario-based role-playing experiment. In Study 1, we simulated a situation in which the buyer is asked about their likelihood of selecting a socially responsible supplier, while in Study 2we simulated a situation in which the socially responsible supplier is asked about the likelihood of selling products to a buyer. Results: the results indicate that information transparency affects the decision to select socially responsible partners. Stakeholder pressure partially moderates this relationship, while location does not moderate this relationship in either study. Conclusion: we conclude that information transparency throughout the supply chain is a relevant factor in negotiations within a socially responsible context. Information transparency is a key aspect for both the buyer and the supplier when selecting a socially responsible partner.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosana da Rosa Portella Tondolo & Juliana Bonomi Santos & Vilmar Antonio Gonçalves Tondolo & Ely Paiva, 2023. "Information Transparency, Location, and Stakeholder Pressure on the Socially Responsible Partner Selection," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 27(Vol. 27 N), pages 210290-2102.
    • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:27:y:2023:i:2:1562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1562
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1562/1859
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simona Romani & Silvia Grappi & Richard P. Bagozzi, 2016. "Corporate Socially Responsible Initiatives and Their Effects on Consumption of Green Products," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 253-264, May.
    2. ManMohan S. Sodhi & Christopher S. Tang, 2019. "Research Opportunities in Supply Chain Transparency," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(12), pages 2946-2959, December.
    3. Belen Fernandez-Feijoo & Silvia Romero & Silvia Ruiz, 2014. "Effect of Stakeholders’ Pressure on Transparency of Sustainability Reports within the GRI Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 53-63, June.
    4. Kedia, Ben L. & Mukherjee, Debmalya, 2009. "Understanding offshoring: A research framework based on disintegration, location and externalization advantages," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 250-261, July.
    5. Joshi, Ashwin W. & Arnold, Stephen J., 1998. "How relational norms affect compliance in industrial buying," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 105-114, February.
    6. Charness, Gary & Gneezy, Uri & Kuhn, Michael A., 2012. "Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 1-8.
    7. Klassen, Robert D. & Vereecke, Ann, 2012. "Social issues in supply chains: Capabilities link responsibility, risk (opportunity), and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 103-115.
    8. Tang, Christopher S. & Zhou, Sean, 2012. "Research advances in environmentally and socially sustainable operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(3), pages 585-594.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Veera Suchitra & Bietsch Samantha & Jones Susan & Ward Paul, 2024. "Systematic Literature Review of Corporate Sustainability and Financial Performance Linkages," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 91(1), pages 115-142.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Mingze & Wong, Christina WY. & Wong, Chee Yew & Boon-itt, Sakun, 2025. "The impact of sustainability reporting on manufacturer market and operations performance: Five long-term event studies from signaling and stakeholder perspectives," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    2. Barbaglia, Martina & Bianchini, Roberto & Butticè, Vincenzo & Elia, Stefano & Mariani, Marcello M., 2023. "The role of environmental sustainability in the relocation choices of MNEs: Back to the home country or welcome in a new host country?," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(5).
    3. Jayani Ishara Sudusinghe & Stefan Seuring, 2020. "Social Sustainability Empowering the Economic Sustainability in the Global Apparel Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Kai Kang & Xinfeng Luan & Wenjing Shen & Yanfang Ma & Xuguang Wei, 2020. "The Strategies of the Poverty-Alleviation Supply Chain with Government Subsidies and Cost Sharing: Government-Led or Market-Oriented?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-24, May.
    5. Rodrigo Freire Lins & Alice Erthal & Leonardo Marques, 2023. "Supply Chain Sustainability Reporting In The Global South: The Role Of Funding," Post-Print hal-04051778, HAL.
    6. Preethi Raja & Usha Mohan, 2025. "A conceptual framework proposed through literature review to determine the dimensions of social transparency in global supply chains," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(3), pages 2515-2542, September.
    7. Cao, Yifan & Shen, Bin & Tana, Siqin, 2025. "Enhancing ESG practices in supply chain operations through information disclosure: The “ETHICS” Framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    8. Hong, Zhaofu & Chu, Chengbin & Zhang, Linda L. & Yu, Yugang, 2017. "Optimizing an emission trading scheme for local governments: A Stackelberg game model and hybrid algorithm," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 172-182.
    9. Mohammad Najjar & Michael H. Small & Mahmoud M. Yasin, 2020. "Social Sustainability Strategy across the Supply Chain: A Conceptual Approach from the Organisational Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Nur Sunar & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2022. "Socially relevant and inclusive operations management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4379-4392, December.
    11. Muhammad Azeem Akbar & Arif Ali Khan & Zhiqiu Huang, 2023. "Multicriteria decision making taxonomy of code recommendation system challenges: a fuzzy-AHP analysis," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 115-131, June.
    12. Mohsin Malik & Hadi Ghaderi & Amir Andargoli, 2021. "A resource orchestration view of supply chain traceability and transparency bundles for competitive advantage," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3866-3881, December.
    13. Ederer, Florian & Stremitzer, Alexander, 2017. "Promises and expectations," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 161-178.
    14. Nikolas K. Kelling & Philipp C. Sauer & Stefan Gold & Stefan Seuring, 2021. "The Role of Institutional Uncertainty for Social Sustainability of Companies and Supply Chains," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(4), pages 813-833, November.
    15. Lijia Shi & Jing Xie & Zhifeng Gao, 2018. "The impact of deal†proneness on WTP estimates in incentive†aligned value elicitation methods," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(3), pages 353-362, May.
    16. Rita Maria Difrancesco & Purushottam Meena & Gopal Kumar, 2023. "How blockchain technology improves sustainable supply chain processes: a practical guide," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 620-641, June.
    17. Chen, Jen-Yi, 2022. "Responsible sourcing and supply chain traceability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    18. Ding, Huiping & Zhao, Qilan & An, Zhirong & Tang, Ou, 2016. "Collaborative mechanism of a sustainable supply chain with environmental constraints and carbon caps," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PA), pages 191-207.
    19. Jeehan Awad & Rodrigo Martín‐Rojas, 2024. "Enhancing social responsibility and resilience through entrepreneurship and digital environment," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1688-1704, May.
    20. Schmidt, Christoph G. & Wuttke, David A. & Heese, H. Sebastian & Wagner, Stephan M., 2023. "Antecedents of public reactions to supply chain glitches," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:27:y:2023:i:2:1562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.