Subjective utility maximizers, in an infinitely repeated game, will learn to predict opponents' future strategies and will converge to play according to a Nash equilibrium of the repeated game. Players' initial uncertainty is placed directly on opponents' strategies and the above result is obtained under the assumption that the individual beliefs are compatible with the chosen strategies. An immediate corollary is that, when playing a Harsanyi-Nash equilibrium of a repeated game of incomplete information about opponents' payoff matrices, players will eventually play a Nash equilibrium of the real game, as if they had complete information. Copyright 1993 by The Econometric Society.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Publisher Info
Article provided by Econometric Society in its journal Econometrica.
Volume (Year): 61 (1993) Issue (Month): 5 (September) Pages: 1019-45 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Ehud Kalai & Ehud Lehrer, 1991.
"Private-Beliefs Equilibrium,"
Discussion Papers
926, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Kalai, Ehud & Lehrer, Ehud, 1991.
"Private-Beliefs Equilibrium,"
Working Papers
91-19, C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University.
[Downloadable!]
Woodford, Michael, 1990.
"Learning to Believe in Sunspots,"
Econometrica,
Econometric Society, vol. 58(2), pages 277-307, March.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Aumann, Robert J. & Heifetz, Aviad, 2002.
"Incomplete information,"
Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications,
in: R.J. Aumann & S. Hart (ed.), Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 43, pages 1665-1686
Elsevier.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Aumann, Robert J. & Heifetz, Aviad, 2001.
"Incomplete Information,"
Working Papers
1124, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences.
[Downloadable!]
Mertens, J.-F., 1986.
"Repeated games,"
CORE Discussion Papers
1986024, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
Ehud Kalai & Ehud Lehrer, 1992.
"Weak and Strong Merging of Opinions,"
Discussion Papers
983, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.) This item has more than 25 citations. To prevent cluttering this page, these citations are listed on a separate page.