Nontransitive Preferences in Decision Theory

Citations

Cited by:

1. Birnbaum, Michael H. & Gutierrez, Roman J., 2007. "Testing for intransitivity of preferences predicted by a lexicographic semi-order," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 96-112, September.
2. Walter Bossert & Kotaro Suzumura, 2015. "Expected utility without full transitivity," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 45(4), pages 707-722, December.
   • Bossert, Walter & Suzumura, Kotaro, 2014. "Expected utility without full transitivity," CIS Discussion paper series 627, Center for Intergenerational Studies, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
   • Walter BOSSERT & Kotaro SUZUMURA, 2014. "Expected Utility without Full Transitivity," Cahiers de recherche 07-2014, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ.
   • BOSSERT, Walter & SUZUMURA, Kotaro, 2014. "Expected utility without full transitivity," Cahiers de recherche 2014-03, Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques.
3. Michele Lombardi, 2009. "Minimal covering set solutions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 32(4), pages 687-695, May.
4. Voorneveld, Mark, 1999. "Numerical Representation of Incomplete and Nontransitive Preferences and Indifferences on a Countable Set," Research Papers in Economics 1999:6, Stockholm University, Department of Economics.
5. Wright, George & Cairns, George & Goodwin, Paul, 2009. "Teaching scenario planning: Lessons from practice in academe and business," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(1), pages 323-335, April.
6. repec:cup:judgdm:v:15:y:2020:i:6:p:1044-1051 is not listed on IDEAS
7. Michele Lombardi, 2008. "Uncovered set choice rules," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 31(2), pages 271-279, August.
   • Michele Lombardi, 2006. "Uncovered Set Choice Rule," Working Papers 563, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
8. Petri, Henrik & Voorneveld, Mark, 2016. "Characterizing lexicographic preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 54-61.
   • Petri, Henrik & Voorneveld, Mark, 2015. "Characterizing lexicographic preferences," SSE Working Paper Series in Economics 2015:2, Stockholm School of Economics.
9. Linares, Pedro, 2009. "Are inconsistent decisions better? An experiment with pairwise comparisons," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(2), pages 492-498, March.
10. Nuh Aygün Dalkıran & Furkan Yıldız, 2021. "Another Characterization of Expected Scott-Suppes Utility Representation," Bogazici Journal, Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Bogazici University, Department of Economics, vol. 35(2), pages 177-193.
11. Bouyssou, Denis & Marchant, Thierry, 2011. "Bibliometric rankings of journals based on Impact Factors: An axiomatic approach," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 75-86.
    • Denis Bouyssou & Thierry Marchant, 2011. "Bibliometric rankings of journals based on Impact Factors: An axiomatic approach," Post-Print hal-02359815, HAL.
12. Theodore Turocy, 2007. "On the sufficiency of transitive preferences," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(22), pages 1-9.
13. Ernest H. Forman & Saul I. Gass, 2001. "The Analytic Hierarchy Process---An Exposition," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 469-486, August.
14. Denis Bouyssou & Marc Pirlot, 2008. "On some ordinal models for decision making under uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 19-48, October.
    • Denis Bouyssou & Marc Pirlot, 2008. "On some ordinal models for decision making under uncertainty," Post-Print hal-02361905, HAL.
15. Brandl, Florian & Brandt, Felix & Hofbauer, Johannes, 2019. "Welfare maximization entices participation," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 308-314.
16. Wei Ma, 2018. "Random Expected Utility Theory with a Continuum of Prizes," Working Papers 201854, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
17. Michael Birnbaum & Ulrich Schmidt, 2008. "An experimental investigation of violations of transitivity in choice under uncertainty," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 77-91, August.
    • Birnbaum, Michael H. & Schmidt, Ulrich, 2008. "An experimental investigation of violations of transitivity in choice under uncertainty," Kiel Working Papers 1396, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
18. Birnbaum, Michael H. & Schmidt, Ulrich, 2006. "Empirical Tests of Intransitivity Predicted by Models of Risky Choice," Economics Working Papers 2006-10, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Department of Economics.
19. Han Bleichrodt & Ulrich Schmidt, 2002. "A Context-Dependent Model of the Gambling Effect," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(6), pages 802-812, June.
20. Michael H. Birnbaum, 2020. "Reanalysis of Butler and Pogrebna (2018) using true and error model," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(6), pages 1044-1051, November.
21. Mongin, P., 1998. "Does Optimization Imply Rationality?," Papers 9817, Paris X - Nanterre, U.F.R. de Sc. Ec. Gest. Maths Infor..
    • P. Mongin, 1998. "Does optimization imply rationality ?," THEMA Working Papers 98-17, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    • Mongin, Philippe, 1998. "Does optimization imply rationality?," MPRA Paper 37740, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Mongin, Philippe, 2000. "Does optimization imply rationality?," MPRA Paper 78026, University Library of Munich, Germany.
22. George Wu, 1999. "Anxiety and Decision Making with Delayed Resolution of Uncertainty," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 159-199, April.
23. Enrico Diecidue & Nils Rudi & Wenjie Tang, 2012. "Dynamic Purchase Decisions Under Regret: Price and Availability," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 9(1), pages 22-30, March.
24. Louis Lévy-Garboua, 1999. "Expected utility and cognitive consistency," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques bla99104, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
    • Louis Lévy-Garboua, 1999. "Expected Utility and Cognitive Consistency," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-03674666, HAL.
    • Louis Lévy-Garboua, 1999. "Expected Utility and Cognitive Consistency," Post-Print halshs-03674666, HAL.
    • Levy-Garboua, L., 1999. "Expected Utility and Cognitive Consistency," Papiers d'Economie Mathématique et Applications 1999.104, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
25. Pahikkala, Tapio & Waegeman, Willem & Tsivtsivadze, Evgeni & Salakoski, Tapio & De Baets, Bernard, 2010. "Learning intransitive reciprocal relations with kernel methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(3), pages 676-685, November.
26. Florian Brandl & Felix Brandt, 2020. "Arrovian Aggregation of Convex Preferences," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(2), pages 799-844, March.
27. Bouyssou, Denis & Pirlot, Marc, 2004. "A note on Wakker's Cardinal Coordinate Independence," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 11-22, July.
    • Denis Bouyssou & Marc Pirlot, 2004. "A note on Wakker's Cardinal Coordinate Independence," Post-Print hal-00004075, HAL.
28. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:4:y:2007:i:22:p:1-9 is not listed on IDEAS
29. Saul I. Gass, 2005. "Model World: The Great Debate—MAUT Versus AHP," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 308-312, August.
30. Ehrgott, Matthias & Wang, Judith Y.T. & Watling, David P., 2015. "On multi-objective stochastic user equilibrium," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P3), pages 704-717.
31. John Quah, 2006. "Weak axiomatic demand theory," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 29(3), pages 677-699, November.
    • Quah, J.K.-H., 2000. "Weak Axiomatic Demand Theory," Economics Papers 2000-w12, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
32. Peter Baumann, 2022. "Rational intransitive preferences," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 21(1), pages 3-28, February.
33. Wei Ma, 2018. "Random expected utility theory with a continuum of prizes," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 787-809, December.
34. Heller, Yuval, 2012. "Justifiable choice," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 375-390.
    • Heller, Yuval, 2009. "Justifiable choice," MPRA Paper 15645, University Library of Munich, Germany.
35. Wei Ma, 2018. "Random Expected Utility Theory with a Continuum of Prizes," Working Papers 760, Economic Research Southern Africa.
36. Denis Bouyssou & Marc Pirlot, 2004. "Preferences for multi-attributed alternatives: Traces, Dominance, and Numerical Representations," Post-Print hal-00004104, HAL.
37. Hertzler, Greg, 1995. "Expected Utility Theory: Rest in Peace?," 1995 Conference (39th), February 14-16, 1995, Perth, Australia 148802, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
38. Michael Birnbaum & Ulrich Schmidt, 2010. "Testing transitivity in choice under risk," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 69(4), pages 599-614, October.
39. Monsuur, Herman & Storcken, Ton, 1997. "Measuring intransitivity," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 125-152, October.
40. Robin M. Hogarth & Natalia Karelaia, 2005. "Simple Models for Multiattribute Choice with Many Alternatives: When It Does and Does Not Pay to Face Trade-offs with Binary Attributes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(12), pages 1860-1872, December.
    • Robin Hogarth & Natalia Karelaia, 2004. "Simple models for multi-attribute choice with many alternatives: When it does and does not pay to face tradeoffs with binary attributes," Economics Working Papers 739, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Apr 2005.
41. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2101 is not listed on IDEAS
42. Simone Cerreia-Vioglio & Efe A. Ok, 2018. "The Rational Core of Preference Relations," Working Papers 632, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
43. Marc Le Menestrel & Luk N. Wassenhove, 2016. "Subjectively biased objective functions," EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 4(1), pages 73-83, June.
44. Speckbacher, Gerhard, 2009. "Comparing financial investments by their state dependent returns: A one-way log utility representation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(1), pages 323-326, February.
45. Konstantinos Katsikopoulos & Gerd Gigerenzer, 2008. "One-reason decision-making: Modeling violations of expected utility theory," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 35-56, August.
46. Amélie Vrijdags, 2010. "An experimental investigation of transitivity in set ranking," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 68(1), pages 213-232, February.
47. Edward E. Schlee & M. Ali Khan, 2022. "Money Metrics In Applied Welfare Analysis: A Saddlepoint Rehabilitation," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(1), pages 189-210, February.
48. García-Bermejo, Juan Carlos, 2012. "A Note on Selecting Maximals in Finite Spaces," Working Papers in Economic Theory 2012/06, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain), Department of Economic Analysis (Economic Theory and Economic History).
49. Ok, Efe A. & Masatlioglu, Yusufcan, 2007. "A theory of (relative) discounting," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 137(1), pages 214-245, November.
50. Edouard Kujawski, 2005. "A reference‐dependent regret model for deterministic tradeoff studies," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(2), pages 119-137.
51. Brunelli, Matteo & Fedrizzi, Michele, 2015. "Boundary properties of the inconsistency of pairwise comparisons in group decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 765-773.
52. Bouyssou, Denis & Pirlot, Marc, 2005. "Following the traces:: An introduction to conjoint measurement without transitivity and additivity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(2), pages 287-337, June.
53. Raphaël Giraud, 2005. "Anomalies de la théorie des préférences. Une interprétation et une proposition de formalisation," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 56(4), pages 829-854.
54. Jacinto González-pachón & Sixto Ríos-insua, 1999. "Mixture of Maximal Quasi Orders: a new Approach to Preference Modelling," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 73-88, August.