IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login

Citations for "Two New Proofs of Afriat's Theorem"

by M.J. Todd & A. Fostel & H.E. Scarf

For a complete description of this item, click here. For a RSS feed for citations of this item, click here.
as in new window

  1. Francoise Forges & Vincent Iehlé, 2013. "Afriat's Theorem for Indivisible Goods," CESifo Working Paper Series 4498, CESifo Group Munich.
  2. Laurens Cherchye & Bram De Rock & Vincenzo Platino, 2010. "Private versus public consumption within groups : testing the nature of goods from aggregate data," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 10090, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
  3. Forges, Françoise & Iehlé, Vincent, 2012. "Essential Data, Budget Sets and Rationalization," MPRA Paper 36519, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  4. Matthew Polisson, 2011. "Goods Versus Characteristics: Revealed Preference Procedures for Nested Models," Economics Series Working Papers 531, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
  5. Teo Chung Piaw & Rakesh V. Vohra, 2003. "Afrait's Theorem and Negative Cycles," Discussion Papers 1377, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
  6. Lee, Chia-Yen & Johnson, Andrew L. & Moreno-Centeno, Erick & Kuosmanen, Timo, 2013. "A more efficient algorithm for Convex Nonparametric Least Squares," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(2), pages 391-400.
  7. Ivar Ekeland & Alfred Galichon, 2013. "The housing problem and revealed preference theory: duality and an application," Economic Theory, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 425-441, November.
  8. Satoru Fujishige & Zaifu Yang, 2012. "On Revealed Preference and Indivisibilities," Discussion Papers 12/02, Department of Economics, University of York.
  9. Matthew Polisson & John K.-H. Quah, 2013. "Revealed preference tests under risk and uncertainty," Discussion Papers in Economics 13/24, Department of Economics, University of Leicester.
  10. John Quah, 2014. "A test for weakly separable preferences," Economics Series Working Papers 708, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
  11. David Laibson & Leeat Yariv, 2007. "Safety in Markets: An Impossibility Theorem for Dutch Books," Levine's Bibliography 122247000000001746, UCLA Department of Economics.
  12. Francoise Forges & Enrico Minelli, 2006. "Afriat’s Theorem for General Budget Sets," CESifo Working Paper Series 1703, CESifo Group Munich.
  13. Matthew Polisson & John K.-H. Quah, 2013. "Revealed Preference in a Discrete Consumption Space," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 5(1), pages 28-34, February.
  14. Apartsin, Yevgenia & Kannai, Yakar, 2006. "Demand properties of concavifiable preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 36-55, December.
  15. Green, Jerry & Hojman, Daniel, 2007. "Choice, Rationality and Welfare Measurement," Working Paper Series rwp07-054, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
  16. Anat Bracha, 2004. "Consistency and Refutability of Affective Choice," Yale School of Management Working Papers amz2639, Yale School of Management.
  17. József Sákovics (University of Edinburgh), 2012. "Revealed cardinal preference," ESE Discussion Papers 212, Edinburgh School of Economics, University of Edinburgh.
  18. D. Wade Hands, 2014. "Paul Samuelson and Revealed Preference Theory," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 46(1), pages 85-116, Spring.
  19. John Geanakoplos, 2013. "Afriat from MaxMin," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1904, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
  20. Christopher Chambers & Federico Echenique, 2009. "Profit maximization and supermodular technology," Economic Theory, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 173-183, August.
  21. John Quah & Hiroki Nishimura & Efe A. Ok, 2013. "A Unified Approach to Revealed Preference Theory: The Case of Rational Choice," Economics Series Working Papers 686, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
  22. Faravelli, Marco & Sanchez-Pages, Santiago, 2012. "(Don’t) Make My Vote Count," SIRE Discussion Papers 2012-07, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    • Santiago Sanchez-Pages (University of Edinburgh) & Marco Faravelli (School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia), 2012. "(Don't) Make My Vote Count," ESE Discussion Papers 213, Edinburgh School of Economics, University of Edinburgh.
  23. Matthew Polisson, 2012. "Goods versus characteristics: dimension reduction and revealed preference," IFS Working Papers W12/02, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
  24. repec:hal:wpaper:halshs-00870052 is not listed on IDEAS
  25. John Geanakoplos, 2013. "Afriat from MaxMin," Levine's Working Paper Archive 786969000000000746, David K. Levine.
  26. John Quah, 2012. "A revealed preference test for weakly separable preferences," Economics Series Working Papers 601, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
  27. John Geanakoplos, 2013. "Afriat from MaxMin," Economic Theory, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 443-448, November.
  28. Andrés Carvajal & Rahul Deb & James Fenske & John Quah, 2014. "A nonparametric analysis of multi-product oligopolies," Economic Theory, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 253-277, October.
  29. Alfred Galichon & John Quah, 2013. "Symposium on revealed preference analysis," Economic Theory, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 419-423, November.
  30. Leeat Yariv, 2004. "Safety in Markets: An Impossibility Theorem for Dutch Books," Theory workshop papers 658612000000000072, UCLA Department of Economics.
  31. Per Hjertstrand & James Swofford, 2012. "Revealed preference tests for consistency with weakly separable indirect utility," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 72(2), pages 245-256, February.
  32. Kolesnikov, Alexander V. & Kudryavtseva, Olga V. & Nagapetyan, Tigran, 2013. "Remarks on Afriat’s theorem and the Monge–Kantorovich problem," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(6), pages 501-505.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.