IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzbsps/spiii2014602.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Wissenschaftliche Güte und gesellschaftliche Relevanz der Sozial- und Raumwissenschaften: Ein spannungsreiches Verhältnis. Handreichung für Wissenschaft, Wissenschaftspolitik und Praxis

Author

Listed:
  • Froese, Anna
  • Mevissen, Natalie
  • Böttcher, Julia
  • Simon, Dagmar
  • Lentz, Sebastian
  • Knie, Andreas

Abstract

Ausgangspunkt für dieses Discussion Paper sind fehlende Erkenntnisse über Wissenstransfer in den Sozialwissenschaften. Die Sozialwissenschaften erbringen bereits zahlreiche Transferleistungen für die Gesellschaft, die jedoch in den gesellschaftlichen und den wissenschaftlichen Diskursen kaum sichtbar sind. Aufbauend auf der Analyse und der Systematisierung erbrachter Transferleistungen und bestehender Transferprozesse werden Handlungsempfehlungen vorgestellt, um Hinweise zu Konzeptions-, Gestaltungs- und Handlungsmöglichkeiten für den Wissenstransfer in den Sozialwissenschaften zu geben. Im Fokus stehen disziplinäre Besonderheiten von Wissenstransfer sowie die praktischen Konsequenzen für die Erfassung von Wissenstransferleistungen in den Sozialwissenschaften. Zum besseren Verständnis der Thematik wird zunächst der Begriff des Wissenstransfers in den Sozialwissenschaften definiert und konzeptualisiert. Schwerpunkt der Analyse liegt auf dem Wissenstransfer zwischen Forschenden und wissenschaftsexternen Akteuren. Die Handlungsempfehlungen wurden vom Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB) und dem Leibniz-Institut für Länderkunde entwickelt. In einem zweiten Schritt wurden sie mit Forschungseinrichtungen der Sozial- und Raumwissenschaften sowie Akteuren aus Wissenschaftspolitik und Praxis diskutiert und validiert. Sie sprechen insbesondere außeruniversitäre Forschungseinrichtungen (AUF), Forschende sowie Akteure aus Wissenschaftspolitik (Wissenschaftsorganisationen, Fördergeber und Fachverbände) und Praxis an und sind über die Sozialwissenschaften hinaus für andere Disziplinen von Bedeutung.

Suggested Citation

  • Froese, Anna & Mevissen, Natalie & Böttcher, Julia & Simon, Dagmar & Lentz, Sebastian & Knie, Andreas, 2014. "Wissenschaftliche Güte und gesellschaftliche Relevanz der Sozial- und Raumwissenschaften: Ein spannungsreiches Verhältnis. Handreichung für Wissenschaft, Wissenschaftspolitik und Praxis," Discussion Papers, Research Group Science Policy Studies SP III 2014-602, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbsps:spiii2014602
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/96510/1/784946973.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ,, 2001. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(6), pages 1157-1160, December.
    2. Helga Nowotny, 2003. "Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(3), pages 151-156, June.
    3. ,, 2001. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(5), pages 1025-1031, October.
    4. Nooteboom, B., 2001. "Problems and Solutions in Knowledge Transfer," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2001-74-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    5. Wentland, Alexander & Knie, Andreas & Simon, Dagmar, 2011. "Warum aus Forschern keine Erfinder werden: Innovationshemmnisse im deutschen Wissenschaftssystem am Beispiel der Biotechnologie," WZBrief Bildung 17, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    6. Bozeman, Barry, 2000. "Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(4-5), pages 627-655, April.
    7. Knie, Andreas & Torka, Marc, 2010. "Auf der Suche nach der Innovation: Grenzgänger zwischen Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft," WSI-Mitteilungen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 63(5), pages 242-248.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mevissen, Natalie & Böttcher, Julia, 2011. "Aushandlung nach innen, Legitimation nach außen: Leibniz-Institute im Spannungsfeld zwischen Forschung und Anwendung," Discussion Papers, Research Group Science Policy Studies SP III 2011-602, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    2. Zhou, H. & Uhlaner, L.M., 2009. "Knowledge Management in the SME and its Relationship to Strategy, Family Orientation and Organization Learning," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2009-026-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    3. Zhou, H. & Uhlaner, L.M., 2009. "Knowledge Management as a Strategic Tool to Foster Innovativeness of SMEs," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2009-025-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    4. Arwin van Buuren & Derk Loorbach, 2009. "Policy innovation in isolation?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 375-392, May.
    5. Sofia Pemsel & Kristian Widen, 2011. "Bridging boundaries between organizations in construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(5), pages 495-506.
    6. Dolf Talman & Zaifu Yang, 2012. "On a Parameterized System of Nonlinear Equations with Economic Applications," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 154(2), pages 644-671, August.
    7. Subramanian, S.V. & Subramanyam, Malavika A. & Selvaraj, Sakthivel & Kawachi, Ichiro, 2009. "Are self-reports of health and morbidities in developing countries misleading? Evidence from India," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 260-265, January.
    8. World Bank, 2002. "Costa Rica : Social Spending and the Poor, Volume 1. Summary of Issues and Recommendations with Executive Summary," World Bank Publications - Reports 15330, The World Bank Group.
    9. Emin Karagözoğlu, 2014. "A noncooperative approach to bankruptcy problems with an endogenous estate," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 217(1), pages 299-318, June.
    10. Hernández-Hernández, M.E. & Kolokoltsov, V.N. & Toniazzi, L., 2017. "Generalised fractional evolution equations of Caputo type," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 184-196.
    11. Simon Levin & Anastasios Xepapadeas, 2021. "On the Coevolution of Economic and Ecological Systems," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 13(1), pages 355-377, October.
    12. Juan Moreno-Ternero & Antonio Villar, 2006. "The TAL-Family of Rules for Bankruptcy Problems," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 27(2), pages 231-249, October.
    13. Lee, Hiro & van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique, 2005. "The impact of the US safeguard measures on Northeast Asian producers: General equilibrium assessments," MPRA Paper 82288, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Hoang Ngoc Tuan, 2015. "Boundedness of a Type of Iterative Sequences in Two-Dimensional Quadratic Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 234-245, January.
    15. Wang, Daojuan & Hain, Daniel S. & Larimo, Jorma & Dao, Li T., 2020. "Cultural differences and synergy realization in cross-border acquisitions," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(3).
    16. Wulf Gaertner & Richard Bradley & Yongsheng Xu & Lars Schwettmann, 2019. "Against the proportionality principle: Experimental findings on bargaining over losses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, July.
    17. Turpie, J.K. & Marais, C. & Blignaut, J.N., 2008. "The working for water programme: Evolution of a payments for ecosystem services mechanism that addresses both poverty and ecosystem service delivery in South Africa," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(4), pages 788-798, May.
    18. Tilman Br�ck & Patricia Justino & Philip Verwimp & Andrew Tedesco & Alexandra Avdeenko, 2013. "Measuring Conflict Exposure in Micro-Level Surveys," HiCN Working Papers 153, Households in Conflict Network.
    19. Erik Ansink & Hans-Peter Weikard, 2012. "Sequential sharing rules for river sharing problems," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 38(2), pages 187-210, February.
    20. Koichi Hamada & Asahi Noguchi, 2005. "The Role of Preconceived Ideas in Macroeconomic Policy: Japan's Experiences in the Two Deflationary Periods," Working Papers 908, Economic Growth Center, Yale University.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbsps:spiii2014602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzbbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.