IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzblpe/spi2006108.html

On the marriage of flexibility and security: Lessons from the Hartz-reforms in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Leschke, Janine
  • Schmid, Günther
  • Griga, Dorit

Abstract

In the context of the ongoing reforms on European labour markets the keyword 'flexicurity' is presently gaining prominence. We therefore want to explore the importance of the flexicurity-concept on the example of the German Hartzreforms. Starting from the frequently used definition as a trade-off between employers' demands for flexibility and employees' needs for security, different conceptualisations of flexicurity are considered, and criteria for an efficient and equitable flexicurity-nexus are developed. The German debate on flexicurity is briefly looked at. The main part of the paper is devoted to analysing four policy measures which were implemented within the Hartz-reforms: 'Ich-AG' allowance for newly founded businesses, 'personnel service agencies' ('PSA') to place unemployed into regular employment, 'Mini-Jobs' and the introduction of 'Midi-Jobs' which were supposed to serve as stepping stones into employment subject to social insurance contributions and 'wage insurance' for elderly workers. It is assessed whether the measures contribute to enhancing the components of flexibility and security and whether the measures are appropriately balanced. The analysis reveals that the measures' quality could be improved by strengthening different components of the security dimension.

Suggested Citation

  • Leschke, Janine & Schmid, Günther & Griga, Dorit, 2006. "On the marriage of flexibility and security: Lessons from the Hartz-reforms in Germany," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Labor Market Policy and Employment SP I 2006-108, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzblpe:spi2006108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/43983/1/512836795.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Viktor Steiner & Katharina Wrohlich, 2005. "Work Incentives and Labor Supply Effects of the ‘Mini-Jobs Reform’ in Germany," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 32(1), pages 91-116, March.
    2. John P Martin, 1998. "What Works Among Active Labour Market Policies: Evidence from OECD Countries' Experiences," RBA Annual Conference Volume (Discontinued), in: Guy Debelle & Jeff Borland (ed.),Unemployment and the Australian Labour Market, Reserve Bank of Australia.
    3. Hans-Werner Sinn & Christian Holzner & Wolfgang Meister & Wolfgang Ochel & Martin Werding, 2002. "Aktivierende Sozialhilfe - Ein Weg zu mehr Beschäftigung und Wachstum," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 55(09), pages 03-52, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:ecr:col037:5443 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Colin C. Williams & Ioana Alexandra Horodnic, 2017. "Tackling Bogus Self-Employment: Some Lessons From Romania," Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship (JDE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(02), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Dagmara Nikulin & Małgorzata Gawrycka, 2021. "Implementation of the Concept of Flexicurity in the Selected Countries of Central Eastern Europe," Ekonomista, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, issue 1, pages 118-141.
    4. Jennifer Ferreira, 2016. "The German temporary staffing industry: growth, development, scandal and resistance," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(2), pages 117-143, March.
    5. Dagmara Nikulin & Małgorzata Gawrycka, 2021. "Implementation of the Concept of Flexicurity in the Selected Countries of Central Eastern Europe," Ekonomista, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, vol. 1, pages 118-141, January.
    6. Gundogan, Naci, 2009. "Can Denmark’s Flexicurity System Be Replicated In Developing Countries? The Case Of Turkey," MPRA Paper 17470, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Schulze Buschoff, Karin & Protsch, Paula, 2007. "Die soziale Sicherung von (a-)typisch Beschäftigten im europäischen Vergleich," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Labor Market Policy and Employment SP I 2007-105, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    8. Francisco J. GRACIA & José RAMOS & José María PEIRÓ & Amparo CABALLER & Beatriz SORA, 2011. "Job attitudes, behaviours and well-being among different types of temporary workers in Europe and Israel," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 150(3-4), pages 235-254, December.
    9. Lehwess-Litzmann, René, 2012. "What Does Flexicurity Have to Gain from the Capability-Approach?," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 23(2), pages 119-139.
    10. Anna Ilsøe, 2012. "Signs of segmentation? A flexicurity perspective on decentralized collective bargaining in Denmark," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 33(2), pages 245-265, May.
    11. Anne Albert-Cromarias, 2010. "Penser La Flexicurité Au Niveau « Méso » : Entre Ancrage Territorial Et Innovation Sociale," Post-Print hal-02363602, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ali, Tanweer, 2011. "The UK Future Jobs Fund: Labour’s adoption of the job guarantee principle," MPRA Paper 29422, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Nicola Pavoni & G. L. Violante, 2007. "Optimal Welfare-to-Work Programs," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 74(1), pages 283-318.
    3. Richard B. Freeman, 2007. "Labor Market Institutions Around the World," NBER Working Papers 13242, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Christine Mayrhuber & Silvia Rocha-Akis, 2014. "Niedriglohnbeschäftigung und Sozialversicherungsabgaben," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 60727.
    5. Ammermüller, Andreas & Zwick, Thomas & Boockmann, Bernhard & Maier, Michael, 2007. "Do hiring subsidies reduce unemployment among the elderly? Evidence from two natural experiments," ZEW Discussion Papers 07-001, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    6. Hilbert, Christoph & Mytzek, Ralf, 2002. "Strategische und methodische Ansatzpunkte zur Ermittlung des regionalen Qualifikationsbedarfs," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Labor Market Policy and Employment FS I 02-211, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    7. Hans‐Werner Sinn, 2006. "Das deutsche Rätsel: Warum wir Exportweltmeister und Schlusslicht zugleich sind," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Miyamoto, Hiroaki, 2011. "Cyclical behavior of unemployment and job vacancies in Japan," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 214-225.
    9. Müller, Kai-Uwe & Steiner, Viktor, 2011. "Beschäftigungswirkungen von Lohnsubventionen und Mindestlöhnen - Zur Reform des Niedriglohnsektors in Deutschland," Discussion Papers 2011/4, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    10. Laun, Lisa, 2019. "In-work benefits across Europe," Working Paper Series 2019:16, IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.
    11. Joachim Ragnitz & Marcel Thum, 2008. "Beschäftigungswirkungen von Mindestlöhnen : eine Erläuterung zu den Berechnungen des ifo-Instituts ; Wiederabdruck aus ifo-Schnelldienst Nr. 1/2008, 16-20," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 61(06), pages 62-66, March.
    12. Maximilian Joseph Blömer & Clemens Fuest & Andreas Peichl, 2019. "Raus aus der Niedrigeinkommensfalle(!) – Der ifo-Vorschlag zur Reform des Grundsicherungssystems," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 72(04), pages 34-43, February.
    13. Ching-Yang Lin & Hiroaki Miyamoto, 2012. "Estimating a Search and Matching Model of the Aggregate Labor Market in Japan," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-850, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    14. Edmond Malinvaud, 2001. "The Role of Structural Policies Meant to Promote Employment," 'Angelo Costa' Lectures Serie, SIPI Spa, issue Lect. II.
    15. Cho, Heepyung & Kang, Sung Hoon & Kwon, Sungjoon, 2024. "Do income tax incentives for job creation targeting young workers in SMEs stimulate employment? Evidence from South Korea," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 191-203.
    16. G. Carone & A. Salomäki, 2001. "Reforms in tax-benefit systems in order to increase emplyoment incentives in the EU," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 160, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    17. Christine Mayrhuber & Silvia Rocha-Akis & Christine Zulehner, 2014. "Verteilungseffekte einer Änderung der Abgabenbelastung geringer Erwerbseinkommen in Österreich. Ergebnisse einer Mikrosimulation," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 87(11), pages 767-781, November.
    18. Kaltenborn, Bruno & Koch, Susanne & Kress, Ulrike & Walwei, Ulrich & Zika, Gerd, 2003. "Sozialabgaben und Beschäftigung (Social security contributions and employment)," Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 36(4), pages 672-688.
    19. Jelena Rkman, 2020. "An Estimated Search and Matching Model of the Croatian Labor Market: Post-crisis Analysis," Croatian Economic Survey, The Institute of Economics, Zagreb, vol. 22(2), pages 35-72, December.
    20. Maciej Bukowski & Piotr Lewandowski, 2005. "Transitions from unemployment in Poland: a multinomial logit analysis," Labor and Demography 0511008, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 19 Dec 2005.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzblpe:spi2006108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzbbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.