IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzbior/spiii2005103.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Lernen und Macht in einer Non-Profit Organisation

Author

Listed:
  • Barnat, Miriam

Abstract

Welche Rolle spielt Macht, wenn Organisationen lernen? Die vorliegende Studie untersucht Lernprozesse in einem Umweltverband. In der Analyse von Interviews von Mitgliedern der Organisation wird Macht sichtbar. Folgende drei Ergebnisse sind zentral: 1. Alle Befragten beziehen sich in ihrer Schilderung der Lernprozesse auf Machtquellen. In den meisten Fällen werden diese nicht als solche bezeichnet. Das Wort Macht wird selten benutzt. 2. Die Befragten nehmen unterschiedliche Positionen zu dem Lernprozess ein, indem sie verschiedene Gewichtungen von Problemen vornehmen. Es gibt Befürworter von ganzheitlichen und solche von eingeschränkten Lernprozessen. Darüber hinaus sehen einige Befragte keine Notwendigkeit für Veränderungen. Diese werden als drei verschiedene Typen beschrieben. 3. In allen Interviews wird Macht als legitim betrachtet. Allerdings lässt sich nicht feststellen, ob alle Befürworter des Wandels oder alle Bewahrer des Status Quo sich auf ähnliche Machtquellen beziehen. Fazit der Studie: Eine Stigmatisierung von Macht ist nicht sinnvoll, weil Macht Dimension jeglichen organisationalen Handelns ist. Eine erfolgreiche Umsetzung von Organisationsler-nen setzt ein differenziertes Verständnis für Macht in einer Organisation voraus.

Suggested Citation

  • Barnat, Miriam, 2005. "Lernen und Macht in einer Non-Profit Organisation," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Innovation and Organization SP III 2005-103, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbior:spiii2005103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/47954/1/501730664.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berthoin Antal, Ariane & Dierkes, Meinolf, 2002. "Organisationslernen und Wissensmanagement: Überlegungen zur Entwicklung und zum Stand des Forschungsfeldes," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Organisation and Technology FS II 02-113, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    2. Filion, Normand & Rudolph, Hedwig, 1999. "Power, control and organisational learning," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Organization and Employment FS I 99-104, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    3. George P. Huber, 1991. "Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 88-115, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Böhling, Kathrin & Busch, Tanja & Berthoin Antal, Ariane & Hofmann, Jeanette, 2006. "Lernprozesse im Kontext von UN-Weltgipfeln: Die Vergesellschaftung internationalen Regierens," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Innovation and Organization SP III 2006-102, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sylvie Héroux & Mélanie Roussy, 2020. "Three cases of compliance with governance regulation: an organizational learning perspective," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(2), pages 449-479, June.
    2. Andrea Francesconi & Enrico Guarini, 2017. "Performance-based funding e sistemi di allocazione delle risorse ai dipartimenti: prime evidenze nelle universit? italiane," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(1), pages 113-134.
    3. Pooja Kushwaha & M. K. Rao, 2017. "Integrating the Linkages between Learning Systems and Knowledge Process: An Exploration of Learning Outcomes," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 5(1), pages 11-23, January.
    4. Nicolai J. Foss, 1996. "Firms, Incomplete Contracts and Organizational Learning," DRUID Working Papers 96-2, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    5. Edna Isabel de la Garza Martinez & Zochitl Araiza Garza & Nidia Estela Hernández Castro & Izamar Guadalupe Amador Charles, 2016. "Relationship Between Levels Of Organization Learning,Relacion Entre Los Niveles De Aprendizaje Organizacional," Revista Internacional Administracion & Finanzas, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 9(3), pages 71-82.
    6. Schweizer, Lars & Patzelt, Holger, 2012. "Employee commitment in the post-acquisition integration process: The effect of integration speed and leadership," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 298-310.
    7. Bianco, Federica & Michelino, Francesca, 2010. "The role of content management systems in publishing firms," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 117-124.
    8. Eelke Wiersma, 2007. "Conditions That Shape the Learning Curve: Factors That Increase the Ability and Opportunity to Learn," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(12), pages 1903-1915, December.
    9. Ahammad, Mohammad Faisal & Tarba, Shlomo Yedidia & Liu, Yipeng & Glaister, Keith W., 2016. "Knowledge transfer and cross-border acquisition performance: The impact of cultural distance and employee retention," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 66-75.
    10. Nachiketa Tripathi & Sonia Nongmaithem, 2007. "Differences in Organizational Learning Processes: A Study of Two Organizations," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 32(3), pages 301-320, August.
    11. Sirén, Charlotta & Kohtamäki, Marko, 2016. "Stretching strategic learning to the limit: The interaction between strategic planning and learning," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 653-663.
    12. Park, Hyun-Soo & Auh, Seigyoung & Maher, Amro A. & Singhapakdi, Anusorn, 2012. "Marketing's accountability and internal legitimacy: Implications for firm performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(11), pages 1576-1582.
    13. Schilling, Melissa A. & Green, Elad, 2011. "Recombinant search and breakthrough idea generation: An analysis of high impact papers in the social sciences," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(10), pages 1321-1331.
    14. Di Guardo, Maria Chiara & Marrocu, Emanuela & Paci, Raffaele, 2016. "The effect of local corruption on ownership strategy in cross-border mergers and acquisitions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4225-4241.
    15. Martina Linnenluecke & Andrew Griffiths & Peter Mumby, 2015. "Executives’ engagement with climate science and perceived need for business adaptation to climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 321-333, July.
    16. Daniela P. Blettner & Zi-Lin He & Songcui Hu & Richard A. Bettis, 2015. "Adaptive aspirations and performance heterogeneity: Attention allocation among multiple reference points," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(7), pages 987-1005, July.
    17. Mohammadi, Ali & Broström, Anders & Franzoni, Chiara, 2015. "Work Force Composition and Innovation: How Diversity in Employees’ Ethnical and Disciplinary Backgrounds Facilitates Knowledge Re-combination," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 413, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    18. Wang, Daojuan & Hain, Daniel S. & Larimo, Jorma & Dao, Li T., 2020. "Cultural differences and synergy realization in cross-border acquisitions," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(3).
    19. Zhou, H. & Uhlaner, L.M., 2009. "Knowledge Management in the SME and its Relationship to Strategy, Family Orientation and Organization Learning," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2009-026-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    20. repec:dgr:rugsom:97b05 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Maria Darra, 2013. "Learning Styles as a Fundamental Improvement Factor of Learning Quality," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 117-140.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbior:spiii2005103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzbbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.