IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/busper/v5y2017i1p11-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating the Linkages between Learning Systems and Knowledge Process: An Exploration of Learning Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Pooja Kushwaha
  • M. K. Rao

Abstract

This study intends to explore the influence of learning systems (formal and informal) and knowledge process integration on individual level learning outcomes. This article reviews the extensive literature on the role of learning systems to acquire, disseminate, interpret, and store knowledge within the organizational purview, which subsequently leads toward learning outcomes in the workplace. A methodical review of the literature has been conducted to explore the connection among learning systems, knowledge process, and learning outcomes. Based on the theoretical underpinnings, a conceptual framework has been proposed. Furthermore, this study incorporates a discussion on Huber’s (1991) learning components for achieving better learning outcomes. Findings of the study outline that the role of informal learning is preferential than formal learning system, which harmonizes with knowledge processes and subsequently affects organizational learning outcomes. Authors point out the potentiality of contextual factors to affect the aforesaid relationship. Later part of the study discusses implication, limitations, and future suggestions for the researchers.

Suggested Citation

  • Pooja Kushwaha & M. K. Rao, 2017. "Integrating the Linkages between Learning Systems and Knowledge Process: An Exploration of Learning Outcomes," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 5(1), pages 11-23, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:busper:v:5:y:2017:i:1:p:11-23
    DOI: 10.1177/2278533716671616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2278533716671616
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2278533716671616?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey Cummings, 2003. "Knowledge Sharing : A Review of the Literature," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 19060, December.
    2. Fernando Olivera, 2000. "Memory Systems In Organizations: An Empirical Investigation Of Mechanisms For Knowledge Collection, Storage And Access," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 811-832, September.
    3. Barry M. Staw & Robert I. Sutton & Lisa H. Pelled, 1994. "Employee Positive Emotion and Favorable Outcomes at the Workplace," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 51-71, February.
    4. Anne S. Miner & Stephen J. Mezias, 1996. "Ugly Duckling No More: Pasts and Futures of Organizational Learning Research," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 88-99, February.
    5. George P. Huber, 1991. "Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 88-115, February.
    6. Maurizio Zollo & Sidney G. Winter, 2002. "Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 339-351, June.
    7. Herbert A. Simon, 1991. "Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 125-134, February.
    8. Hadas Weinberger & Dov Te'eni & Ariel J. Frank, 2008. "Ontology‐based evaluation of organizational memory," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 59(9), pages 1454-1468, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pablo Martin de Holan & Nelson Phillips, 2004. "Remembrance of Things Past? The Dynamics of Organizational Forgetting," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(11), pages 1603-1613, November.
    2. June-Young Kim & Ji-Yub (Jay) Kim & Anne S. Miner, 2009. "Organizational Learning from Extreme Performance Experience: The Impact of Success and Recovery Experience," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(6), pages 958-978, December.
    3. Yang, Yumei & Secchi, Davide & Homberg, Fabian, 2018. "Are organisational defensive routines harmful to the relationship between personality and organisational learning?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 155-164.
    4. Nikolaos G. Theriou & Vassilis Aggelidis & Georgios N. Theriou, 2009. "A Theoretical Framework Contrasting the Resource-Based Perspective and the Knowledge-Based View," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 177-190.
    5. Linda Argote & Ella Miron-Spektor, 2011. "Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1123-1137, October.
    6. Yadong Luo, 2020. "Adaptive learning in international business," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(9), pages 1547-1567, December.
    7. Hohenthal, Jukka & Johanson, Jan & Johanson, Martin, 2014. "Network knowledge and business-relationship value in the foreign market," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 4-19.
    8. Sylvie Héroux & Mélanie Roussy, 2020. "Three cases of compliance with governance regulation: an organizational learning perspective," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(2), pages 449-479, June.
    9. Li, Mingxiang, 2021. "Exploring novel technologies through board interlocks: Spillover vs. broad exploration," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    10. Sirén, Charlotta & Kohtamäki, Marko, 2016. "Stretching strategic learning to the limit: The interaction between strategic planning and learning," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 653-663.
    11. Martina Linnenluecke & Andrew Griffiths & Peter Mumby, 2015. "Executives’ engagement with climate science and perceived need for business adaptation to climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 321-333, July.
    12. Wang, Daojuan & Hain, Daniel S. & Larimo, Jorma & Dao, Li T., 2020. "Cultural differences and synergy realization in cross-border acquisitions," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(3).
    13. Dario Blanco-Fernandez & Stephan Leitner & Alexandra Rausch, 2022. "Interactions between the individual and the group level in organizations: The case of learning and autonomous group adaptation," Papers 2203.09162, arXiv.org.
    14. Lee, Ruby P. & Johnson, Jean L. & Grewal, Rajdeep, 2008. "Understanding the antecedents of collateral learning in new product alliances," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 192-200.
    15. Henri C. Dekker & Alexandra Van den Abbeele, 2010. "Organizational Learning and Interfirm Control: The Effects of Partner Search and Prior Exchange Experiences," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(6), pages 1233-1250, December.
    16. Anika Laperrière & Martine Spence, 2015. "Enacting international opportunities: The role of organizational learning in knowledge-intensive business services," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 212-241, September.
    17. Hafeez, Salima & Rana, Asif Mehmood & Chaudhry, Rashid Mehmood & Khan, Muhammad Aslam & Ahmad, H.Mushtaq & Rehman, Kashif Ur, 2011. "Perspectives of entrepreneurial orientation with the quality of life," MPRA Paper 53860, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Hoppmann, Joern & Wu, Geng & Johnson, Jillian, 2021. "The impact of demand-pull and technology-push policies on firms’ knowledge search," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    19. Giovanni Gavetti, 2012. "PERSPECTIVE—Toward a Behavioral Theory of Strategy," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 267-285, February.
    20. Andrew Hargadon & Angelo Fanelli, 2002. "Action and Possibility: Reconciling Dual Perspectives of Knowledge in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 290-302, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:busper:v:5:y:2017:i:1:p:11-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.