IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzbotg/fsii02113.html

Organisationslernen und Wissensmanagement: Überlegungen zur Entwicklung und zum Stand des Forschungsfeldes

Author

Listed:
  • Berthoin Antal, Ariane
  • Dierkes, Meinolf

Abstract

Organisationslernen und Wissensmanagement sind in der Organisationsforschung als anerkannte Forschungsbereiche und in der Organisationspraxis zu einem festen Bestandteil von Veränderungsprozessen geworden. Der Beitrag beschreibt die Entwicklung des Feldes und hebt wesentliche Ergebnisse hervor. Eine Einordnung der bedeutendsten Veränderungen auf dem Gebiet des Organisationslernens und der Wissensgenerierung über die letzten drei Jahrzehnten erfolgt in acht Dimensionen, die die wichtigsten Aspekte der Theorie und Praxis von Organisationslernen beleuchten. Die Wurzeln der Theorieentwicklung zu Organisationslernen liegen in den 1960er und 70er Jahren im angelsächsischen Raum von Organisationswissenschaftlern auf der Basis von Fallstudien und unter fast ausschließlicher Betrachtung des Topmanagements. Im Laufe der folgenden Jahrzehnte wurden die wissenschaftlichen Untersuchungen jedoch auf immer unterschiedlichere Organisationsformen ausgedehnt: von privatwirtschaftlichen Unternehmen auf staatliche, nichtstaatliche und sogar virtuelle Organisationen. Die unterschiedlichsten Wissenschaftstraditionen, von der Psychologie über die Gesellschaftswissenschaften bis hin zu Wirtschaftswissenschaften, leisteten ihren Beitrag zum besseren Verständnis des Prozesses von Organisationslernen und Wissensmanagement. Die Forschung erweiterte ihren Blickwinkel auch dadurch, dass Akteure aus verschiedensten Hierarchieebenen in die Untersuchungen einbezogen wurden. In den vergangenen zehn Jahren wurden politische und emotionale Dimensionen von Organisationslernprozessen in der Praxis des Organisationslernens und dessen wissenschaftlich-intellektueller Rezeption als relevant erkannt.

Suggested Citation

  • Berthoin Antal, Ariane & Dierkes, Meinolf, 2002. "Organisationslernen und Wissensmanagement: Überlegungen zur Entwicklung und zum Stand des Forschungsfeldes," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Organisation and Technology FS II 02-113, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbotg:fsii02113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/49811/1/363106278.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. L. Wade, 1988. "Review," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 99-100, July.
    2. Böhling, Kathrin, 2002. "Learning from environmental actors about environmental developments: the case of international organizations," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Organisation and Technology FS II 02-110, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    3. Dierkes, Meinolf, 1988. "Unternehmenskultur und Unternehmensführung: Konzeptionelle Ansätze und gesicherte Erkenntnisse," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Organisation and Technology FS II 88-103, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    4. Berthoin Antal, Ariane & Dierkes, Meinolf, 1992. "Internationally comparative research in Europe: the underutilized resource," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 585-610.
    5. Berthoin Antal, Ariane & Dierkes, Meinolf & Hähner, Katrin, 1997. "Business perception of contextual changes: sources and impediments to organizational learning," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Organisation and Technology FS II 97-110, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barnat, Miriam, 2005. "Lernen und Macht in einer Non-Profit Organisation," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Innovation and Organization SP III 2005-103, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kaplow, Louis & Shapiro, Carl, 2007. "Antitrust," Handbook of Law and Economics, in: A. Mitchell Polinsky & Steven Shavell (ed.), Handbook of Law and Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 15, pages 1073-1225, Elsevier.
    2. Giuseppe Croce & Emanuela Ghignoni, 2011. "Overeducation and spatial flexibility in Italian local labour markets," Working Papers in Public Economics 145, Department of Economics and Law, Sapienza University of Rome.
    3. Juan Carlos Conesa & Timothy J. Kehoe & Kim J. Ruhl, 2007. "Modeling great depressions: the depression in Finland in the 1990s," Quarterly Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, vol. 31(Nov), pages 16-44.
    4. Duclos, Jean-Yves & Sahn, David & Younger, Stephen D., 2003. "Polarization: Robust Multidimensional Poverty Comparisons," Cahiers de recherche 0304, CIRPEE.
    5. W. Crain & Robert Tollison, 2002. "Consumer Choice and the Popular Music Industry: A Test of the Superstar Theory," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 29(1), pages 1-9, March.
    6. Brock, William A. & Hommes, Cars H. & Wagener, Florian O. O., 2005. "Evolutionary dynamics in markets with many trader types," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1-2), pages 7-42, February.
    7. Basu, Susanto & Fernald, John G. & Shapiro, Matthew D., 2001. "Productivity growth in the 1990s: technology, utilization, or adjustment?," Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 117-165, December.
    8. Carlos Ocaña Pérez de Tudela, 1993. "Modelos dinámicos de competencia estratégica y cambio técnico: una panorámica," Investigaciones Economicas, Fundación SEPI, vol. 17(1), pages 43-63, January.
    9. Víctor Aguirregabiria, 1997. "Estimation of dynamic programming models with censored decision variables," Investigaciones Economicas, Fundación SEPI, vol. 21(2), pages 167-208, May.
    10. Meixing DAI, 2009. "On the role of money growth targeting under inflation targeting regime," Working Papers of BETA 2009-11, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    11. Donato Masciandaro, 1995. "Designing a central bank: Social player, monetary agent, or banking agent?," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 399-410, October.
    12. Bonett, Douglas G. & Seier, Edith, 2002. "A test of normality with high uniform power," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 435-445, September.
    13. Stefania D'Amico, 2004. "Density Estimation and Combination under Model Ambiguity," Computing in Economics and Finance 2004 273, Society for Computational Economics.
    14. Sanogo, Issa & Gyengani, Zakaria, 2008. "Private investment in guinea, does macro-instability matter? A comparative analysis," MPRA Paper 11606, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Crawford, Ian & Laisney, Francois & Preston, Ian, 2003. "Estimation of household demand systems with theoretically compatible Engel curves and unit value specifications," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 221-241, June.
    16. Daniel Urrutiaguer, 2002. "Quality Judgements and Demand for French Public Theatre," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 26(3), pages 185-202, August.
    17. Dorota Ciolek, 2011. "Metody identyfikacji efektow zewnetrznych funkcjonowania klastrów przemyslowych," Working Papers of Economics of European Integration Division 1103, The Univeristy of Gdansk, Faculty of Economics, Economics of European Integration Division.
    18. Fioretti, Guido, 2009. "From men and machines to the organizational learning curve," MPRA Paper 19392, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Simon Gilchrist & John Williams, 1998. "Investment, capacity, and output: a putty-clay approach," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 1998-44, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    20. Alexander L. Wolman, 2007. "The frequency and costs of individual price adjustment," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 531-552.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbotg:fsii02113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzbbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.