IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Hochschulräte in NRW: Mehr Hochschulfreiheit oder Staatseinfluss?


  • Dilger, Alexander


Die Regelungen des Hochschulfreiheitsgesetzes zu Hochschulräten in Nordrhein-Westfalen werden erläutert und analysiert. Entgegen dem Namen des Gesetzes gewinnt der Staat durch die Hochschulräte eher an Einfluss hinsichtlich seiner Hochschulen. Insgesamt hängen die Hochschulräte ziemlich in der Luft und sind eigentlich niemandem bzw. nur sich selbst gegenüber verantwortlich. Es wird empfohlen, den Hochschulen mehr Autonomie und Freiheit auch hinsichtlich der Ausgestaltung ihrer Hochschulräte zu geben.

Suggested Citation

  • Dilger, Alexander, 2013. "Hochschulräte in NRW: Mehr Hochschulfreiheit oder Staatseinfluss?," Discussion Papers of the Institute for Organisational Economics 4/2013, University of Münster, Institute for Organisational Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:umiodp:42013

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Alexander Dilger, 2007. "German Universities as State-sponsored Co-operatives," management revue. Socio-economic Studies, Rainer Hampp Verlag, pages 102-116.
    2. Benjamin E. Hermalin & Michael S. Weisbach, 2003. "Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: a survey of the economic literature," Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, issue Apr, pages 7-26.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Dilger, Alexander, 2015. "Zurück in die dirigistische Vergangenheit: Das Hochschulzukunftsgesetz in NRW," Discussion Papers of the Institute for Organisational Economics 3/2015, University of Münster, Institute for Organisational Economics.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy
    • D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption
    • D71 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:umiodp:42013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.