IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/lueimf/48.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Mitarbeiterorientierte Personalpolitik und Unternehmenserfolg: Ein Anwendungsfall der Anreiz-Beitrags-Theorie

Author

Listed:
  • Martin, Albert
  • Kabst, Rüdiger

Abstract

Mitarbeiterorientierte Personalpolitik ist eine seit langem diskutierte interessengeladene Thematik. Wir wissen jedoch bislang wenig darüber, was Unternehmen veranlasst, eine mitarbeiterorientierte Personalpolitik zu verfolgen. Diese Fragestellung ist weder trivial noch irrelevant - ganz im Gegenteil. Die anglo-amerikanische Forschung zu High Commitment Human Ressource Management legt eine positive Beziehung zum Unternehmenserfolg nahe, welche aus normativen Aspekten anzieht und den Personalwissenschaftler sowie Personalpraktiker auf der Suche nach dem Mehrwert der Personalarbeit besonders interessiert. Diese thematische Relevanz aufgreifend, betrachten wir zwei Fragen: (1) Wie plausibel ist es, einen Zusammenhang zwischen einer mitarbeiterorientierten Personalpolitik und dem ökonomischen Erfolg eines Unternehmens zu vermuten (und wie ließe sich ein derartiger Zusammenhang theoretisch begründen)? (2) Unter welchen Umständen kommt es zur Herausbildung einer mitarbeiterorientierten Personalpolitik? Als Erklärungsansatz ziehen wir die Anreiz-Beitrags-Theorie heran, weil sie robuste Aussagen mit hohem Allgemeinheitsanspruch bereithält. Zudem eignet sich diese aufgrund der ökonomisch-austausch-theoretischen Sicht besonders für die Analyse der aufgeworfenen Fragen auf Unterneh-mensebene. Die aus der theoretischen Diskussion abgeleiteten Hypothesen werden anhand des deutschen Datensatzes des Cranfield Project on International Human Resource Ma-nagement (Cranet) geprüft und im Lichte der gewonnenen Ergebnisse diskutiert.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin, Albert & Kabst, Rüdiger, 2013. "Mitarbeiterorientierte Personalpolitik und Unternehmenserfolg: Ein Anwendungsfall der Anreiz-Beitrags-Theorie," Schriften aus dem Institut für Mittelstandsforschung 48, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IMF).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:lueimf:48
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/85268/1/770565115.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nikolaus Beck & Rüdiger Kabst & Peter Walgenbach, 2009. "The cultural dependence of vocational training," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 40(8), pages 1374-1395, October.
    2. Paul Osterman, 1994. "How Common is Workplace Transformation and Who Adopts it?," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 47(2), pages 173-188, January.
    3. Jürgen Bruns & Rüdiger Kabst, 2005. "Interim-Management: A Paradox for Leadership Research?," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 16(4), pages 512-524.
    4. Chris Brewster & Wolfgang Mayrhofer & Michael Morley (ed.), 2000. "New Challenges for European Human Resource Management," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-59795-2, September.
    5. Catherine Truss & Lynda Gratton & Veronica Hope‐Hailey & Patrick McGovern & Philip Stiles, 1997. "Soft and Hard Models of Human Resource Management: A Reappraisal," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 53-73, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alba Manresa & Andrea Bikfalvi & Alexandra Simon, 2018. "The Use And Determinants Of Training And Development For Creativity And Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(07), pages 1-28, October.
    2. Newburry, William & Gardberg, Naomi A. & Sanchez, Juan I., 2014. "Employer Attractiveness in Latin America: The Association Among Foreignness, Internationalization and Talent Recruitment," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 327-344.
    3. Philippe Askenazy & Eve Caroli, 2006. "Innovative work practices, information technologies and working conditions: evidence for France," EconomiX Working Papers 2006-2, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    4. Eguchi, Kyota, 2004. "Trainers' dilemma of choosing between training and promotion," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(6), pages 765-783, December.
    5. Boucekkine, Raouf & Crifo, Patricia, 2008. "Human Capital Accumulation And The Transition From Specialization To Multitasking," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(3), pages 320-344, June.
    6. İ. Akçomak & Lex Borghans & Bas Weel, 2011. "Measuring and Interpreting Trends in the Division of Labour in the Netherlands," De Economist, Springer, vol. 159(4), pages 435-482, December.
    7. Nicholas Bloom & Renata Lemos & Raffaella Sadun & John Van Reenen, 2020. "Healthy Business? Managerial Education and Management in Health Care," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 102(3), pages 506-517, July.
    8. Derek C. Jones & Takao Kato, 2011. "The Impact of Teams on Output, Quality, and Downtime: An Empirical Analysis Using Individual Panel Data," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 64(2), pages 215-240, January.
    9. Katsuya Takii, 2004. "The Value of Adaptability," Industrial Organization 0406004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Nadia Gama & Steve McKenna & Amanda Peticca-Harris, 2012. "Ethics and HRM: Theoretical and Conceptual Analysis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(1), pages 97-108, November.
    11. Cecilia Garcia-Penalosa & Eve Caroli & Philippe Aghion, 1999. "Inequality and Economic Growth: The Perspective of the New Growth Theories," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 37(4), pages 1615-1660, December.
    12. Caroli, Eve & Greenan, Nathalie & Guellec, Dominique, 2001. "Organizational Change and Skill Accumulation," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 10(2), pages 481-506, June.
    13. repec:iim:iimawp:13106 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Sandra E. Black & Lisa M. Lynch, 2001. "How To Compete: The Impact Of Workplace Practices And Information Technology On Productivity," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 83(3), pages 434-445, August.
    15. Simon Eisele & Martin R. Schneider, 2020. "What Do Unions Do to Work Design? Computer Use, Union Presence, and Tayloristic Jobs in Britain," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(4), pages 604-626, October.
    16. Michael J. Handel & Maury Gittleman, 1999. "Is There a Wage Payoff to Innovative Work Practices?," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_288, Levy Economics Institute.
    17. Avner Ben-Ner & Fanmin Kong & Stephanie Lluis, "undated". "Uncertainty and Organization Design," Working Papers 0107, Human Resources and Labor Studies, University of Minnesota (Twin Cities Campus).
    18. Sandra E. Black & Lisa Lynch & Anya Krivelyova, 2003. "How Workers Fare When Employers Innovate," NBER Working Papers 9569, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Radoslava Nikolova, 2005. "Mutual Monitoring versus Incentive Pay in Teams," Working Papers 2005-39, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    20. Nicholas Bloom & Renata Lemos & Raffaella Sadun & Daniela Scur & John Van Reenen, 2014. "The New Empirical Economics of Management," NBER Working Papers 20102, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    21. Lloyd C. Harris & Emmanuel Ogbonna, 2003. "The Organization of Marketing: A Study of Decentralized, Devolved and Dispersed Marketing Activity," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 483-512, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:lueimf:48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.leuphana.de/institute/imo.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.