IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Whither international trade policies? Worries about continuing protectionism

Listed author(s):
  • Donges, Juergen B.
Registered author(s):

    The eighties should have seen further progress in the liberalization of international trade. During the Tokyo Round of trade policy negotiations (completed in 1979) an agreement on tariff reductions was reached and several "Codes of Conduct" were set up with the aim of stopping the proliferation of non-tariff restrictions and thereby providing for stability and predictability of trade rules. But by now it has become evident that the Tokyo Round marked a turning point in the post-war development towards liberalization. The failure of the GATT Ministerial Meeting in November 1982, mainly due to the clash between the United States and the European Community (and France) over a credible commitment to roll back import restrictions and to curb export subsidies, was a clear indication that the spirit of free trade was fading away. Subsequently, we have witnessed a strong revival of protectionism in the United States - the country which had led the trade liberalization process in the post-war period. Whether the recent meeting of trade ministers in Punta del Este (Uruguay) has laid the foundations of a new liberalization era remains to be seen. The next section highlights recent developments in trade policies, in particular the continued drift into protectionism. It should become clear where countervailing efforts, through a new round of multilateral trade negotiations within GATT (to begin in 1987), are of greatest need. Subsequently, the consequences of current protectionism are recalled, both for the protecting countries themselves and for the world economy as a whole. This is followed by a brief discussion of the causes of observable clashes between international economists' prescriptions and the conduct of trade policies in practice. The last section addresses the prospects for restoring a functioning world trading order.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW) in its series Kiel Discussion Papers with number 125.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 1986
    Handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkdp:125
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Kiellinie 66, D-24105 Kiel

    Phone: +49 431 8814-1
    Fax: +49 431 8814528
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Julio.J. Nogués & Andrzej Olechowski & L. Alan Winters, 2015. "The Extent of Nontariff Barriers to Industrial Countries' Imports," World Scientific Book Chapters,in: Non-Tariff Barriers, Regionalism and Poverty Essays in Applied International Trade Analysis, chapter 2, pages 29-47 World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Robert Baldwin, 1984. "Rent-seeking and trade policy: An industry approach," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 120(4), pages 662-677, December.
    3. Spinanger, Dean & Zietz, Joachim, 1985. "Managing trade but mangling the consumer: Reflections on the EEC's and West Germany's experience with the MFA," Kiel Working Papers 245, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW).
    4. André Sapir & Rolf Langhammer, 1987. "Economic impact of generalized tariff preferences," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/8090, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkdp:125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.