IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/iamodp/172.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Kazakhstan's cotton sector reforms since independence
[Die Reformen des kasachstanischen Baumwollsektors seit der Unabhängigkeit]

Author

Listed:
  • Oshakbayev, Dauren
  • Taitukova, Regina
  • Petrick, Martin
  • Djanibekov, Nodir

Abstract

With the goal of reducing the dependency on oil revenues, the Government of Kazakhstan has recently increased its budget allocations to prop up the domestic agricultural sector. Yet, many observers agree that it is less the amount of public spending that induces long-term growth than the quality of the regulatory environment. Against this background, the current paper analyses the nature and effects of state regulation in the cotton sector. In the early 2000s, it was considered to be the only example of private vertical coordination in Kazakhstani agriculture, which contrasted sharply with the state mandates imposed on producers in Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan. However, in 2007, regulation in Kazakhstan forced ginneries to use a complex warehouse receipt system without making sure that it was accepted by stakeholders and without appropriate institutions for implementing it in place. At the same time, it imposed financing restrictions on ginneries, which were major loan and input providers to farmers. Further measures included the establishment of a special economic zone to host a "cotton cluster". In the following years, private producers and investors turned away from cotton, and cotton area and output fell substantially. We argue that the cotton sector performance after 2007 shows how ill-designed regulation and government interference can turn a promising economic sector into decline. As an unintended side effect, the regulation promoted more diversified crop rotations based on high value crops.

Suggested Citation

  • Oshakbayev, Dauren & Taitukova, Regina & Petrick, Martin & Djanibekov, Nodir, 2018. "Kazakhstan's cotton sector reforms since independence [Die Reformen des kasachstanischen Baumwollsektors seit der Unabhängigkeit]," IAMO Discussion Papers 172, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iamodp:172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/173255/1/1011202573.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:zbw:iamodp:158730 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Wladyslaw Jermakowicz & Piotr Kozarzewski & Julian Pankow, 1996. "Privatization in the Republic of Kazakhstan," CASE Network Studies and Analyses 0085, CASE-Center for Social and Economic Research.
    3. Petrick, Martin & Wandel, Jürgen & Karsten, Katharina, 2011. "Farm restructuring and agricultural recovery in Kazakhstan's grain region: An update," IAMO Discussion Papers 137, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Petrick, Martin & Oshakbayev, Dauren & Taitukova, Regina & Djanibekov, Nodir, 2017. "The return of the regulator: Kazakhstan’s cotton sector reforms since independence," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 430-452.
    2. Akhmadiyeva, Zarema & Herzfeld, Thomas, 2021. "How does practice matches land laws in Central Asia?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:zbw:iamodp:269556 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Petrick, Martin, 2013. "Competition for land and labour among individual farms and agricultural enterprises: Evidence from Kazakhstan's grain region [Der Wettbewerb zwischen Einzelbetrieben und Agrarunternehmen um Boden u," IAMO Discussion Papers 141, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    3. Petrick, Martin & Wandel, Jürgen & Karsten, Katharina, 2013. "Rediscovering the Virgin Lands: Agricultural Investment and Rural Livelihoods in a Eurasian Frontier Area," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 164-179.
    4. Petrick, Martin & Oshakbayev, Dauren & Taitukova, Regina & Djanibekov, Nodir, 2017. "The return of the regulator: Kazakhstan’s cotton sector reforms since independence," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 430-452.
    5. Tothova, Monika & Meyers, William H. & Goychuk, Kateryna, 2013. "Productivity Growth and Variability in KRU: Evidence and Prospects," 2013: Productivity and Its Impacts on Global Trade, June 2-4, 2013. Seville, Spain 152379, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    6. repec:zbw:iamodp:159071 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Rajag M. Nag & Johannes F. Linn & Harinder S. Kohli (ed.), 2016. "Central Asia 2050: Unleashing the Region's Potential," Books, Emerging Markets Forum, edition 1, number centasia2050, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    cotton; Kazakhstan; public regulation; commodity finance; Baumwolle; Kasachstan; staatliche Regulierung; Rohstofffinanzierung;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • O25 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Industrial Policy
    • P23 - Economic Systems - - Socialist Systems and Transition Economies - - - Factor and Product Markets; Industry Studies; Population
    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iamodp:172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iamoode.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iamoode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.