IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/hbsmbr/32.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Der MB-ix und "Gute Arbeit" - Was wir messen können: Wirkungen der Mitbestimmung auf Personalstruktur und Arbeitsbedingungen

Author

Listed:
  • Scholz, Robert

Abstract

Der Mitbestimmungsindex "MB-ix" misst die Verankerung der Mitbestimmung in Unternehmen, um diese mit verschiedenen Indikatoren der Unternehmensentwicklung in Beziehung zu setzen. Für die Ausgestaltung von Arbeitsbedingungen offenbart der Report, dass Unternehmen mit einer starken Verankerung der Mitbestimmung gekennzeichnet sind von einer höheren Bedeutung der Personalarbeit im Vorstand, einer verstärkten Aktivität in der berufichen Ausbildung, einer höheren Beschäftigungssicherung und einer höheren Zahl an Frauen in den Vorständen

Suggested Citation

  • Scholz, Robert, 2017. "Der MB-ix und "Gute Arbeit" - Was wir messen können: Wirkungen der Mitbestimmung auf Personalstruktur und Arbeitsbedingungen," Mitbestimmungsreport 32, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hbsmbr:32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/175261/1/p_mbf_report_2017_32.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Uwe Jirjahn, 2011. "Ökonomische Wirkungen der Mitbestimmung in Deutschland: Ein Update," Schmollers Jahrbuch : Journal of Applied Social Science Studies / Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, vol. 131(1), pages 3-57.
    2. Scholz, Robert & Vitols, Sigurt, 2016. "Der Mitbestimmungsindex MB-ix," Mitbestimmungsreport 22, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    3. Zeibig, Nadine, 2013. "Altersdiskriminierung in der Arbeitswelt – Gerichtliche Entscheidungen im Überblick," WSI-Mitteilungen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 66(5), pages 369-372.
    4. Olaf Hübler, 2003. "Fördern oder behindern Betriebsräte die Unternehmensentwicklung?," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 4(4), pages 379-397, November.
    5. Weckes, Marion, 2016. "Beginnender Kulturwandel oder absehbare Stagnation bei 30%?," Mitbestimmungsreport 21, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scholz, Robert & Vitols, Sigurt, 2018. "Co-determination: A driving force for corporate social responsibility in German companies?," Discussion Papers, Research Group Globalization, Work, and Production SP III 2018-304, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    2. Scholz, Robert & Vitols, Sigurt, 2019. "Board-level codetermination: A driving force for corporate social responsibility in German companies?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 25(3), pages 233-246.
    3. Uwe JIRJAHN & Stephen C. SMITH, 2018. "Nonunion Employee Representation: Theory And The German Experience With Mandated Works Councils," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 89(1), pages 201-233, March.
    4. Rapp, Marc Steffen & Wolff, Michael & Hennig, Jan C. & Udoieva, Iuliia, 2019. "Mitbestimmung im Aufsichtsrat und ihre Wirkung auf die Unterenhmensführung: Eine empirische Analyse vor dem Hintergrund der Finanz- und Wirtschaftskrise," Study / edition der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf, volume 127, number 424, June.
    5. Klaus Brockhoff, 2006. "Technologischer Wandel und Corporate Governance," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 58(54), pages 7-31, January.
    6. Uwe Jirjahn, 2017. "Globalisierung und betriebliche Mitbestimmung," Research Papers in Economics 2017-05, University of Trier, Department of Economics.
    7. Walther, Axel & Möltner, Hannah & Morner, Michèle, 2019. "Die Motivation von Arbeitnehmervertreterinnen und -vertretern zur Übernahme eines Aufsichtsratsmandats: Ein qualitativer Ansatz [The motivation of employee representatives to take over supervisory," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 26(1), pages 63-88.
    8. Rafael Gralla & Kornelius Kraft, 2018. "Separating Introduction Effects from Selectivity Effects:Â The Differences in Employment Patterns of Codetermined Firms," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 32(1), pages 93-111, March.
    9. Steffen Müller & Jens Stegmaier, 2020. "Why is there resistance to works councils in Germany? An economic perspective," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 41(3), pages 540-561, August.
    10. Alessandro Bramucci & Antonello Zanfei, 2015. "The governance of offshoring and its effects at home. The role of codetermination in the international organization of German firms," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 42(2), pages 217-244, June.
    11. Hinrichsen, Anna & Schiereck, Dirk & von Ahsen, Anette, 2018. "Gender Diversity Issues Within the Company and Beyond: Perceptions of Investor Relations Professionals in German-Speaking Europe," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 72(2), pages 109-125.
    12. Tobias Brändle, 2017. "Flexible collective bargaining agreements: Still a moderating effect on works council behaviour?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(8), pages 1137-1153, December.
    13. David Marsden, 2015. "The future of the German industrial relations model [Die Zukunft des deutschen Modells der Arbeitsbeziehungen]," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 48(2), pages 169-187, August.
    14. Joachim Wagner, 2014. "Daten des IAB-Betriebspanels und Firmenpaneldaten aus Erhebungen der Amtlichen Statistik – substitutive oder komplementäre Inputs für die Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung? [Are data from the IAB Est," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 47(1), pages 63-70, March.
    15. Gralla, Rafael & Kraft, Kornelius, 2012. "Higher Wages, Overstaffing or Both? The Employer's Assessment of Problems Regarding Wage Costs and Staff Level in Co-Determined Establishments," IZA Discussion Papers 7021, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Laszlo Goerke & Sabrina Jeworrek, 2021. "Paid vacation use: The role of works councils," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 42(3), pages 473-503, August.
    17. Uwe Jirjahn, 2012. "Industrielle Beziehungen und Innovationserfolg," Research Papers in Economics 2012-02, University of Trier, Department of Economics.
    18. Heidemann, Winfried, 2019. "Trendbericht: Betriebliche Weiterbildung," Mitbestimmungspraxis 24, Hans Böckler Foundation, Institute for Codetermination and Corporate Governance (I.M.U.).
    19. Scholz, Robert, 2017. "German Model or German Models? The spatial distribution of capital and labour in the corporate governance of stock listed companies," Discussion Papers, Research Group Globalization, Work, and Production SP III 2017-301, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    20. Genz Sabrina & Bellmann Lutz & Matthes Britta, 2019. "Do German Works Councils Counter or Foster the Implementation of Digital Technologies? : First Evidence from the IAB-Establishment Panel," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 239(3), pages 523-564, June.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hbsmbr:32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/boeckde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.