IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/esprep/341057.html

Understanding the Perceptions and Purchase Behavior of Pakistani Gen Z Towards Fair Trade Products

Author

Listed:
  • Basit, Syed Abdul
  • Siddiqui, Danish Ahmed

Abstract

his study investigates the perceptions and purchase behavior of Pakistani Generation Z consumers toward Fair Trade (FT) products, addressing a significant gap in the literature given the limited research outside Western economies. The primary objective was to validate the determinants influencing these consumers' perceptions and purchase decisions regarding FT products. We proposed a theoretical framework contending that FT knowledge (FTK) would influence FT Beliefs (FTB) and experience (FTE), these will in turn affect the Attitude Towards FT (FTA), along with Subjective Norm (FTSN), and Moral Obligation (FTMO). These will ultimately affect FT Purchase Intentions (FTPI). The methodology adopted a post-positivist research paradigm, employing Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to determine the validity of the conceptual framework and the relationships between variables. The study also conducted a multi-group analysis to explore gender differences in ethical consumption behavior. A total of 350 participants were included in the demographic profile. Key findings reveal that Fair Trade knowledge significantly influences consumer beliefs and experiences. Positive initial experiences, particularly concerning product quality and availability, along with positive beliefs seem to have a positive effect on Attitude Towards FT (FTA), Subjective Norm (FTSN), and Moral Obligation (FTMO). The effect of Attitudes towards FT product purchase intentions is predominantly positive, driven by social consciousness and environmental awareness, with emotional connections playing a crucial role. Subjective norms, especially peer and family influence, significantly impact purchase intentions, with descriptive norms being more influential than injunctive norms. Moral obligation emerged as the strongest predictor of purchase intentions, highlighting the role of personal responsibility in addressing global inequalities. Significant gender differences were observed, with female consumers demonstrating stronger FT knowledge, more positive attitudes, higher moral obligation, and stronger purchase intentions than males. In conclusion, the proposed theoretical model effectively explains the fair trade consumption behavior of Pakistani Generation Z, emphasizing the multifaceted interplay of cognitive, experiential, and moral factors that vary across genders. These insights suggest the need for gender-differentiated marketing strategies to promote Fair Trade product adoption effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Basit, Syed Abdul & Siddiqui, Danish Ahmed, 2026. "Understanding the Perceptions and Purchase Behavior of Pakistani Gen Z Towards Fair Trade Products," EconStor Preprints 341057, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:341057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/341057/1/Understanding-Generation-Z-Basit.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vermeir, Iris & Verbeke, Wim, 2008. "Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: Theory of planned behaviour and the role of confidence and values," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 542-553, January.
    2. Chris Arnot & Peter C. Boxall & Sean B. Cash, 2006. "Do Ethical Consumers Care About Price? A Revealed Preference Analysis of Fair Trade Coffee Purchases," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 54(4), pages 555-565, December.
    3. Robert Caruana & Michal J. Carrington & Andreas Chatzidakis, 2016. "“Beyond the Attitude-Behaviour Gap: Novel Perspectives in Consumer Ethics”: Introduction to the Thematic Symposium," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(2), pages 215-218, June.
    4. Michele Micheletti & Dietlind Stolle, 2007. "Mobilizing Consumers to Take Responsibility for Global Social Justice," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 611(1), pages 157-175, May.
    5. Gwang-Suk Kim & Grace Lee & Kiwan Park, 2010. "A Cross-National Investigation on How Ethical Consumers Build Loyalty Toward Fair Trade Brands," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(4), pages 589-611, November.
    6. Peterson, Robert A, 1994. "A Meta-analysis of Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(2), pages 381-391, September.
    7. Louise M. Hassan & Edward Shiu & Deirdre Shaw, 2016. "Who Says There is an Intention–Behaviour Gap? Assessing the Empirical Evidence of an Intention–Behaviour Gap in Ethical Consumption," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(2), pages 219-236, June.
    8. Kirsty Golding & Ken Peattie, 2005. "In search of a golden blend: perspectives on the marketing of fair trade coffee," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(3), pages 154-165.
    9. A. Beldad & S. Hegner, 2018. "Determinants of Fair Trade Product Purchase Intention of Dutch Consumers According to the Extended Theory of Planned Behaviour," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 191-210, September.
    10. repec:feb:natura:0061 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Ward, Scott, 1974. "Consumer Socialization," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 1(2), pages 1-14, Se.
    12. Lee, Min-Young & Jackson, Vanessa & Miller-Spillman, Kimberly A. & Ferrell, Erika, 2015. "Female consumers׳ intention to be involved in fair-trade product consumption in the U.S.: The role of previous experience, product features, and perceived benefits," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 91-98.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wintschnig, Bea Alexandra, 2021. "The Attitude-Behavior Gap – Drivers and Barriers of Sustainable Consumption," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 6(2), pages 324-346.
    2. Rommel Salvador & Altaf Merchant & Elizabeth Alexander, 2014. "Faith and Fair Trade: The Moderating Role of Contextual Religious Salience," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(3), pages 353-371, May.
    3. Alvina Gillani & Smirti Kutaula & Leonidas C. Leonidou & Paul Christodoulides, 2021. "The Impact of Proximity on Consumer Fair Trade Engagement and Purchasing Behavior: The Moderating Role of Empathic Concern and Hypocrisy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 557-577, March.
    4. Elena Kossmann & Mónica Gómez-Suárez, 2018. "Decision-making processes for purchases of ethical products: gaps between academic research and needs of marketing practitioners," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 15(3), pages 353-370, September.
    5. Takahashi, Ryo & Todo, Yasuyuki & Funaki, Yukihiko, 2018. "How Can We Motivate Consumers to Purchase Certified Forest Coffee? Evidence From a Laboratory Randomized Experiment Using Eye-trackers," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 107-121.
    6. Kutaula, Smirti & Gillani, Alvina & Leonidou, Leonidas C. & Christodoulides, Paul, 2022. "Integrating fair trade with circular economy: Personality traits, consumer engagement, and ethically-minded behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1087-1102.
    7. Ken Peattie & Anthony Samuel, 2018. "Fairtrade Towns as Unconventional Networks of Ethical Activism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 265-282, November.
    8. Nayeon Kim & Kyungtag Lee, 2023. "Environmental Consciousness, Purchase Intention, and Actual Purchase Behavior of Eco-Friendly Products: The Moderating Impact of Situational Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-17, March.
    9. Frommeyer, Britta & Wagner, Elisa & Hossiep, C. Richard & Schewe, Gerhard, 2022. "The utility of intention as a proxy for sustainable buying behavior – A necessary condition analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 201-213.
    10. Veronika Andorfer & Ulf Liebe, 2012. "Research on Fair Trade Consumption—A Review," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 106(4), pages 415-435, April.
    11. Rahul Govind & Jatinder Jit Singh & Nitika Garg & Shachi D’Silva, 2019. "Not Walking the Walk: How Dual Attitudes Influence Behavioral Outcomes in Ethical Consumption," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(4), pages 1195-1214, April.
    12. Sven Kilian & Andreas Mann, 2021. "The Phantom of the ‘Responsible Consumer’: Unmasking the Intention–Action Gap with an Indirect Questioning Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, December.
    13. Dirk C. Moosmayer & Yanyan Chen & Susannah M. Davis, 2019. "Deeds Not Words: A Cosmopolitan Perspective on the Influences of Corporate Sustainability and NGO Engagement on the Adoption of Sustainable Products in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 135-154, August.
    14. Zhang, Tong & Hu, Wuyang & Zhu, Zhanguo & Penn, Jerrod, 2023. "Consumer preference for food products addressing multiple dimensions of poverty: Evidence from China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    15. Roberta Sebastiani & Francesca Montagnini & Daniele Dalli, 2013. "Ethical Consumption and New Business Models in the Food Industry. Evidence from the Eataly Case," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(3), pages 473-488, May.
    16. Cristina Longo & Avi Shankar & Peter Nuttall, 2019. "“It’s Not Easy Living a Sustainable Lifestyle”: How Greater Knowledge Leads to Dilemmas, Tensions and Paralysis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(3), pages 759-779, February.
    17. Erifili Papista & Athanasios Krystallis, 2013. "Investigating the Types of Value and Cost of Green Brands: Proposition of a Conceptual Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(1), pages 75-92, June.
    18. Shamila Nabi Khan & Nayab Minhas & Nathan Neale, 2025. "Bridging the green gap: examining consumer green perceptions in an extended model of theory of planned behavior," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.
    19. Ildiko Kovacs & Eva Reka Keresztes, 2022. "Perceived Consumer Effectiveness and Willingness to Pay for Credence Product Attributes of Sustainable Foods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, April.
    20. Kyungeun Sung & Tim Cooper & Sarah Kettley, 2019. "Developing Interventions for Scaling Up UK Upcycling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-31, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:341057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.