IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/cuswps/71.html

Wie gestaltend forschen? Zur Methodologie und Methode einer transdisziplinären Gestaltungsforschung zu volkswirtschaftlichen Fragen

Author

Listed:
  • Egerer, Elsa

Abstract

Ausgehend von den Krisen unserer Zeit und dem normativen Bekenntnis zu einer transformativen Ökonomik erläutert das Diskussionspapier die These: "Gestaltung braucht Kreativität". Die gegenwärtige dominante Praxis der Volkswirtschaftslehre wird dahingehend kritisiert, dass sie kreativ-gestaltende Elemente marginalisiert bzw. die Prognose wissenschaftskulturell höher wertschätzt als wirtschaftspolitische Gestaltungvorschläge. Vor diesem Hintergrund wird begründet, wieso volkswirtschaftliche Gestaltungsforschung neuer wissenschaftlicher Qualitätskriterien bedarf. Hierzu werden u. a. basierend auf der Literatur zu Design, Zukunftsforschung, Systemtheorie sowie zur Rhetorik der Ökonomik verschiedene Kriterien diskutiert. Zudem wird die Frage adressiert, wie Gestaltungsforschung konkret in Handlungslogiken umgesetzt werden kann. Im Ergebnis wird - ausgehend von den Erfahrungen im Kontext des Forschungsprojektes "Finanzwende für Resilienz und Nachhaltigkeit" - ein Werkstattbericht zu gestaltungsorientierter Forschung in der Praxis vorgestellt und die Herausforderungen diskutiert. Zur differenzierten Beurteilung der Güte von Gestaltungsvorschlägen wird die Unterscheidung zwischen "ziellogischer" und "status-quo-logischer Wirkmächtigkeit" vorgeschlagen.

Suggested Citation

  • Egerer, Elsa, 2023. "Wie gestaltend forschen? Zur Methodologie und Methode einer transdisziplinären Gestaltungsforschung zu volkswirtschaftlichen Fragen," Working Paper Serie des Instituts für Ökonomie 71, Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung (HfGG), Institut für Ökonomie.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:cuswps:71
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/268375/1/1831027356.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McCloskey, Donald N, 1983. "The Rhetoric of Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 21(2), pages 481-517, June.
    2. Claudius Gräbner & Birte Strunk, 2020. "Pluralism in economics: its critiques and their lessons," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 311-329, October.
    3. Hochmann, Lars, 2020. "Vom Leben her denken: Annäherungen an eine Theorie der Gesellschaftsgestaltung," Working Paper Serie des Instituts für Ökonomie 54, Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung (HfGG), Institut für Ökonomie.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Buchner, Martin & Rose, Julian & Johannesson, Magnus & Malan, Mandy & Ankel-Peters, Jörg, 2025. "Seeking Scientific Consensus - An Expert Survey on the Replication Debate between Acemoglu et al. (2001) and Albouy (2012)," I4R Discussion Paper Series 270, The Institute for Replication (I4R).
    2. J. Kornai., 2002. "The System Paradigm," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, vol. 4.
    3. Suzuki, Tomo, 2003. "The accounting figuration of business statistics as a foundation for the spread of economic ideas," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 65-95, January.
    4. Hendrik P. van Dalen, 2003. "Pluralism in Economics: A Public Good or a Public Bad?," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 03-034/1, Tinbergen Institute, revised 18 May 2004.
    5. Luzar, E. Jane, 1990. "Environmental Hazards Of Farming: Thinking About The Management Challenge: Discussion," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 22(01), pages 1-3, July.
    6. Dorotheea-Beatrice-Ruxandra Chiosea & Camelia-Daniela Hategan, 2024. "Research Trends in Going Concern Assessment and Financial Distress in Last Two Decades: A Bibliometric Analysis," Risks, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-23, November.
    7. De Geest, Gerrit, 1996. "The debate on the scientific status of law & economics," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(3-5), pages 999-1006, April.
    8. Sujai Shivakumar, 2003. "The Place of Indigenous Institutions in Constitutional Order," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 3-21, March.
    9. Mark D. Packard & Per L. Bylund, 2025. "Truth, knowledge, and entrepreneurship theory: arguments for a rationalist scientific epistemology," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 381-405, June.
    10. Barton, Jared & Pan, Xiaofei, 2022. "Movin’ on up? A survey experiment on mobility enhancing policies," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    11. Weichselbaumer, Doris & Winter-Ebmer, Rudolf, 2003. "Rhetoric in Economic Research: The Case of Gender Wage Differentials," Economics Series 144, Institute for Advanced Studies.
    12. Philip J. Cook & Jens Ludwig, 2019. "Understanding Gun Violence: Public Health Vs. Public Policy," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(3), pages 788-795, June.
    13. Carina Altreiter & Claudius Graebner & Stephan Puehringer & Ana Rogojanu & Georg Wolfmayr, 2020. "Theorizing competition: an interdisciplinary framework," ICAE Working Papers 120, Johannes Kepler University, Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy.
    14. Gillian Hewitson, 2001. "A Survey of Feminist Economics," Working Papers 2001.01, School of Economics, La Trobe University.
    15. Hendrik P. van Dalen, 2019. "Values of Economists Matter in the Art and Science of Economics," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(3), pages 472-499, August.
    16. Monique Reid & Stan du Plessis, 2011. "Talking to the inattentive Public: How the media translates the Reserve Bank’s communications," Working Papers 19/2011, Stellenbosch University, Department of Economics.
    17. Richard A. Easterlin, 2010. "Well-Being, Front and Center: A Note on the Sarkozy Report," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 8(04), pages 22-25, January.
    18. Peter Abelson, 1985. "House and Land Prices in Sydney: 1925 to 1970," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 22(6), pages 521-534, December.
    19. Robert Garnett, 2012. "Pluralism in Economics," Working Papers 201201, Texas Christian University, Department of Economics.
    20. Bogliacino, Francesco & Codagnone, Cristiano, 2021. "Microfoundations, behaviour, and evolution: Evidence from experiments," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 372-385.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology
    • B52 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Modern Monetary Theory;
    • C18 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Methodolical Issues: General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:cuswps:71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hfgg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.