IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/yor/yorken/99-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Further Investigation of Selten's Measure of Predictive Success

Author

Listed:
  • John Hey

Abstract

There are two basic ways of assessing the goodness of fit of theories to data - one based on stochastic theory (for example, the maximised likelihood in some form) and one based on deterministic theory, for example, Selten's Measure of Predictive Success. This paper explores the second of these and presents an application of Selten's Measure to the problem of comparing and ranking various theories of decision making under risk. The paper uses an experiment which was specifically designed to provide insight into the usefulness of this measure. Specifically the questions in the experiment were chosen to give a high degree of discrimination between the various theories being ranked by Selten's measure. However, in common with a previous application, it is found that the measure appears to fail because it has no mechanism for differentiating between observations inconsistent with the theories. This seems to be an inherent failing of a measure based on deterministic theory.

Suggested Citation

  • John Hey, "undated". "A Further Investigation of Selten's Measure of Predictive Success," Discussion Papers 99/30, Department of Economics, University of York.
  • Handle: RePEc:yor:yorken:99/30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.york.ac.uk/media/economics/documents/discussionpapers/1999/9930.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Machina, Mark J, 1982. ""Expected Utility" Analysis without the Independence Axiom," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(2), pages 277-323, March.
    2. Hey, John D., 1998. "An application of Selten's measure of predictive success," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 1-15, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:yor:yorken:99/30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Paul Hodgson). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/deyoruk.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.