IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa14p905.html

E-government: the youngest brother

Author

Listed:
  • Raquel Insa-Ciriza

  • Maria Pujol-Jover
  • Carme Riera-Prunera

Abstract

Information technology has become a very important issue in citizens' relations. It started with e-commerce followed by e-business and ended by e-government. Firms and consumers use internet to provide information and perform many of their business actions. During the last years Governments also started to communicate with citizens through internet providing information and some services. After e-commerce and e-business now it is the Public sector that should face new technologies through e-government. In Spain in order to achieve the optimal technological level, municipalities and Autonomous Communities (AC), have used financial aid from the Spanish Central Government and European Union institutions. This paper examines the evolution of e-government implementation during the last decade (2001-2011) in the Spanish AC. It also assesses its effectiveness exploring three different institutional factors, namely economic aid, type and size of government. The study concludes that e-government has been adopted by all AC but it is still at an early stage. Nevertheless we can also see from the results that institutional economic aid does not necessarily foster the development of e-government implementation. Therefore we suggest that when giving financial aid to promote specific economic aspects in an economy, Institutions should carefully look at efficiency rather than concentrating exclusively on income per capita or gross domestic product, as they tend to do.

Suggested Citation

  • Raquel Insa-Ciriza & Maria Pujol-Jover & Carme Riera-Prunera, 2014. "E-government: the youngest brother," ERSA conference papers ersa14p905, European Regional Science Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa14p905
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa14/e140826aFinal00905.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert E. Quinn & Kim Cameron, 1983. "Organizational Life Cycles and Shifting Criteria of Effectiveness: Some Preliminary Evidence," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 33-51, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agnieszka Kuś & Dorota Grego-Planer, 2021. "A Model of Innovation Activity in Small Enterprises in the Context of Selected Financial Factors: The Example of the Renewable Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Mohammad Safari & Zahra Kazemi Saraskanrood, 2023. "Drivers of the Target Financial Leverage and Speed of Adjustment in Small and Medium-Sized Companies at Different Stages of Life Cycle," European Journal of Studies in Management and Business, EUROKD, vol. 25, pages 16-31.
    3. Ammar Hussain & Minhas Akbar & Muhammad Kaleem Khan & Ahsan Akbar & Mirela Panait & Marian Catalin Voica, 2020. "When Does Earnings Management Matter? Evidence across the Corporate Life Cycle for Non-Financial Chinese Listed Companies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Lynn E. Miller & Karen A. Simmons, 1992. "Differences in Management Practices of Founding and Nonfounding Chief Executives of Human Service Organizations," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 16(4), pages 31-40, July.
    5. Owino O. Joseph & Francis Kibera, 2019. "Organizational Culture and Performance: Evidence From Microfinance Institutions in Kenya," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440198, March.
    6. Patrick G. Scott & Sanjay K. Pandey, 2000. "The influence of red tape on bureaucratic behavior: An experimental simulation," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(4), pages 615-633.
    7. Anne M. Mccarthy & David A. Krueger & Timothy S. Schoenecker, 1991. "Changes in the Time Allocation Patterns of Entrepreneurs," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 15(2), pages 7-18, January.
    8. Pirozzi Maria Grazia & Agliata Francesco & Tuccillo Danilo & Pirozzi Francesco, 2021. "Defining the Integrated Performance Measurement Systems in Small and Medium Enterprises: An Advanced Model," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(12), pages 203-203, July.
    9. Sang-Lyul Ryu & Jayoun Won, 2022. "The Value Relevance of Operational Innovation: Insights from the Perspective of Firm Life Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    10. Benyamin M. Bergmann Lichtenstein & Candida G. Brush, 2001. "How Do “Resource Bundles†Develop and Change in New Ventures? A Dynamic Model and Longitudinal Exploration," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 25(3), pages 37-58, April.
    11. Drogendijk, H.J., 2005. "The Development of Network Relations of MNC Subsidiaries : How Internal MNC and External (Local) Relations Evolve," Discussion Paper 2005-128, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    12. Bernhard Fietz & Julia Hillmann & Edeltraud Guenther, 2021. "Cultural Effects on Organizational Resilience: Evidence from the NAFTA Region," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 5-46, March.
    13. Colombelli, Alessandra, 2014. "The Impact of Top Management Team Characteristics on Firms Growth," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 201412, University of Turin.
    14. Xosé H. Vázquez, 2004. "Allocating Decision Rights on the Shop Floor: A Perspective from Transaction Cost Economics and Organization Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 463-480, August.
    15. Hanna Silvola, 2008. "Design of MACS in growth and revival stages of the organizational life‐cycle," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(1), pages 27-47, March.
    16. Patel, Pankaj C. & Pearce, John A. & Oghazi, Pejvak, 2021. "Not so myopic: Investors lowering short-term growth expectations under high industry ESG-sales-related dynamism and predictability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 551-563.
    17. Luigi Mosca & Martina Gianecchini & Diego Campagnolo, 2021. "Correction to: Organizational life cycle models: a design perspective," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 10(3), pages 139-139, December.
    18. Tatiana Manolova & Linda Edelman & Candida Brush & Beate Rotefoss, 2012. "Properties of emerging organizations: empirical evidence from Norway," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 763-781, October.
    19. Remco Dijkman & Sander Vincent Lammers & Ad Jong, 2016. "Properties that influence business process management maturity and its effect on organizational performance," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 717-734, August.
    20. Jose C. Casillas & Ana M. Moreno-Menéndez & Francisco J. Acedo & Encarnación Ramos-Hidalgo, 2025. "Speed of the internationalisation process. The role of objective vs. subjective perceptions of time," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 166-195, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • H89 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa14p905. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gunther Maier (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ersa.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.