IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa12p598.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Viability of Global Optimization for Parameter Estimation in Spatial Econometrics Models

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Wachowiak
  • Renata Wachowiak-Smolikova
  • Jonathan Zimmerling

Abstract

This paper addresses parameter estimation of spatial regression models incorporating spatial lag. These models are very important in spatial econometrics, where spatial interaction and structure are introduced into regression analysis. Because of spatial interactions, observations are not truly independent, and traditional regression techniques fail. Estimation techniques include maximum likelihood estimation, ordinary least squares, and the method of moments. However, parameters of spatial lag models are difficult to estimate due to the simultaneity bias (Ord, 1975). These estimation problems are generally intractable by standard numerical methods, and, consequently, robust and efficient optimization techniques are needed. In the case of simple general spatial regressive models (GSRMs), standard local optimization methods, such as Newton-Raphson iteration (as suggested by Ord) converge to high-quality solutions. Unfortunately, a good initial guess of the parameters is required for these local methods to succeed. In more complex autoregressive spatial models, an analytic expression for good initial guesses is not available, and, consequently, local methods generally fail. In this paper, global optimization (specifically, particle swarm optimization, or PSO) is used to estimate parameters of spatial autoregressive models. PSO is an iterative, stochastic population-based technique that is increasingly used in a variety of fields to solve complex continuous- and discrete-valued problems. In contrast to genetic algorithms and evolutionary strategies, PSO exploits cooperative and social behavior among members of a population of agents, or particles, which represent a point in the search space. This paper first motivates the need for global methods by demonstrating that GSRM parameters can be estimated with PSO even without a good initial guess, while the local Newton-Raphson and Nelder-Mead approaches have a greater failure rate. Next, PSO was tested with an autoregressive spatial model, for which no analytic initial guess can be computed, and for which no analytic parameter estimation method is known. Simulated data were generated to provide ground truth values to assess the viability of PSO. The global PSO method was found to successfully estimate the parameters using two different MLE approximation techniques for trials with 10, 20, and 40 samples (R2 > 0.867 for all trials). These results indicate that global optimization is a viable approach to estimating the parameters of spatial autoregressive models, and suggest that future directions should focus on more advanced global techniques, such as branch-and-bound, dividing rectangles, and differential evolution, which may further improve parameter estimation in spatial econometrics applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Wachowiak & Renata Wachowiak-Smolikova & Jonathan Zimmerling, 2012. "The Viability of Global Optimization for Parameter Estimation in Spatial Econometrics Models," ERSA conference papers ersa12p598, European Regional Science Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa12p598
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa12/e120821aFinal00600.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alok Bhargava & J. D. Sargan, 2006. "Estimating Dynamic Random Effects Models From Panel Data Covering Short Time Periods," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Econometrics, Statistics And Computational Approaches In Food And Health Sciences, chapter 1, pages 3-27, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Franzese, Robert J. & Hays, Jude C., 2007. "Spatial Econometric Models of Cross-Sectional Interdependence in Political Science Panel and Time-Series-Cross-Section Data," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 140-164, April.
    3. repec:dgr:rugsom:03c27 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Elhorst, J. Paul, 2003. "Unconditional maximum likelihood estimation of dynamic models for spatial panels," Research Report 03C27, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Lung-fei & Yu, Jihai, 2010. "Some recent developments in spatial panel data models," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 255-271, September.
    2. J. Paul Elhorst, 2014. "Dynamic Spatial Panels: Models, Methods and Inferences," SpringerBriefs in Regional Science, in: Spatial Econometrics, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 95-119, Springer.
    3. Kukenova, Madina & Monteiro, Jose-Antonio, 2008. "Spatial Dynamic Panel Model and System GMM: A Monte Carlo Investigation," MPRA Paper 13405, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Feb 2009.
    4. Deng, Minfeng & Athanasopoulos, George, 2011. "Modelling Australian domestic and international inbound travel: a spatial–temporal approach," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 1075-1084.
    5. Tahir Andrabi & Jishnu Das & Asim Ijaz Khwaja & Tristan Zajonc, 2011. "Do Value-Added Estimates Add Value? Accounting for Learning Dynamics," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 3(3), pages 29-54, July.
    6. Alok Bhargava, 2006. "Modelling the Health of Filipino Children," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Econometrics, Statistics And Computational Approaches In Food And Health Sciences, chapter 11, pages 153-168, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    7. Thomas, Duncan & Strauss, John, 1997. "Health and wages: Evidence on men and women in urban Brazil," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 159-185, March.
    8. Seung C. Ahn & Gareth M. Thomas, 2023. "Likelihood-based inference for dynamic panel data models," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 64(6), pages 2859-2909, June.
    9. Tobias Böhmelt & Jürg Vollenweider, 2015. "Information flows and social capital through linkages: the effectiveness of the CLRTAP network," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 105-123, May.
    10. Cheng Hsiao, 2007. "Panel data analysis—advantages and challenges," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 16(1), pages 1-22, May.
    11. Giorgio Calzolari & Laura Magazzini, 2014. "Improving GMM efficiency in dynamic models for panel data with mean stationarity," Working Papers 12/2014, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    12. Bronwyn H. Hall & Zvi Griliches & Jerry A. Hausman, 1984. "Patents and R&D: Is There A Lag?," NBER Working Papers 1454, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Hsiao, Cheng & Hashem Pesaran, M. & Kamil Tahmiscioglu, A., 2002. "Maximum likelihood estimation of fixed effects dynamic panel data models covering short time periods," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 107-150, July.
    14. Bruce Desmarais, 2012. "Lessons in disguise: multivariate predictive mistakes in collective choice models," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 151(3), pages 719-737, June.
    15. Jan Hoffmann & Naima Saeed & Sigbjørn Sødal, 2020. "Liner shipping bilateral connectivity and its impact on South Africa’s bilateral trade flows," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(3), pages 473-499, September.
    16. Jalan, Jyotsna & Ravallion, Martin, 1998. "Are there dynamic gains from a poor-area development program?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 65-85, January.
    17. Maurice J.G. Bun & Sarafidis, V., 2013. "Dynamic Panel Data Models," UvA-Econometrics Working Papers 13-01, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Dept. of Econometrics.
    18. Xosé-Luís Varela-Irimia, 2012. "Profitability, uncertainty and multi-product firm product proliferation: The Spanish car industry," Working Papers XREAP2012-16, Xarxa de Referència en Economia Aplicada (XREAP), revised Sep 2012.
    19. Ahn, Seung C. & Schmidt, Peter, 1995. "Efficient estimation of models for dynamic panel data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 5-27, July.
    20. Huang, Qiong & Chand, Satish, 2015. "Spatial spillovers of regional wages: Evidence from Chinese provinces," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 97-109.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa12p598. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gunther Maier (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ersa.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.