Regional Innovation Performances of Firms in Portugal
Portuguese strategic choices led, during the last two decades, to an overall situation of some positive achievements in which the regions of Lisbon and Algarve have been the only ones to converge towards the European average growth rate. Regarding the other Portuguese regions, and despite national significant growth rates in the 1990s as well as successful dealing with the EMU, these are lagging behind the EU average in what concerns gross production, investment or employment generation. Meanwhile, one of the greatest public policy efforts was to diffuse much of the European funds across the entrepreneurial tissue. After a long pathway, it is time to evaluate firmsâ€šÃ„Ã´ contribution to national and regional growth, their obstacles and consequences. For the purpose of this paper, innovation has served as a major contributor for the previously referred evaluation process. The discussion explains the present performance of Portuguese firms located throughout the country and explores those innovation determinants that have been detected by region. The analysis defines a set of regionalized firmsâ€šÃ„Ã´ behavioural patterns towards innovation. Methodologically, the Logistic Biplot is applied to an extended sample of institutions. Variables such as â€šÃ„Ã²Promoting knowledgeâ€šÃ„Ã´, â€šÃ„Ã²Management skilsâ€šÃ„Ã´, â€šÃ„Ã²Promoting R&Dâ€šÃ„Ã´, â€šÃ„Ã²Knowledge transferâ€šÃ„Ã´, â€šÃ„Ã²Promoting partnership & cooperationâ€šÃ„Ã´ and â€šÃ„Ã²Orientation of public measuresâ€šÃ„Ã´ have been used to design institutional regional profiles. All of them diverse in the way they combine determinants for their patterns towards the dynamics of regional innovation. Also, by creating a gradient of capacity to dynamically innovate, it was possible to analyze the innovation grade of each region in Portugal.
|Date of creation:||Sep 2011|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.ersa.org
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Fagerberg, Jan, 1987.
"A technology gap approach to why growth rates differ,"
Elsevier, vol. 16(2-4), pages 87-99, August.
- Jan Fagerberg, 1987. "A technology gap approach to why growth rates differ," Working Papers Archives 1987002, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
- Jan Fagerberg, 2003.
"Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: an appraisal of the literature,"
Journal of Evolutionary Economics,
Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 125-159, 04.
- Jan Fagerberg, 2003. "Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: an appraisal of the literature," Working Papers Archives 2003001, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
- Kaiser, Ulrich, 2002.
"Measuring knowledge spillovers in manufacturing and services: an empirical assessment of alternative approaches,"
Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 125-144, January.
- Kaiser, Ulrich, 1999. "Measuring Knowledge Spillovers in Manufacturing and Services: An Empirical Assessment of Alternative Approaches," ZEW Discussion Papers 99-62, ZEW - Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung / Center for European Economic Research.
- Audretsch, David B. & Keilbach, Max C. & Lehmann, Erik E., 2006. "Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195183511, March.
- Mark S. Freel, 1998. "Evolution, innovation and learning: evidence from case studies," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 137-149, January.
- Roger Stough & Peter Nijkamp, 2009. "Knowledge spillovers, entrepreneurship and economic development," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 835-838, December.
- Acs, Zoltán J & Audretsch, David B & Braunerhjelm, Pontus & Carlsson, Bo, 2004. "The Missing Link: The Knowledge Filter and Entrepreneurship in Endogenous Growth," CEPR Discussion Papers 4783, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- David Keeble & Frank Wilkinson, 1999. "Collective Learning and Knowledge Development in the Evolution of Regional Clusters of High Technology SMEs in Europe," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 295-303.
- Storper, Michael & Harrison, Bennett, 1991. "Flexibility, hierarchy and regional development: The changing structure of industrial production systems and their forms of governance in the 1990s," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 407-422, October.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa10p886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Gunther Maier)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.