IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

A spatial econometric analysis of cross-border accessibility and development in Portugal and Spain

  • Anabela Ribeiro


  • Jorge Silva
Registered author(s):

    Cross-border regions’ development is one of the EU major current concerns. These regions are usually less dynamic socio-economically and correspond to peripheral areas within each country. Some of these regions have recently benefited from the existence of new roads, which investment was mainly possible through the European financial programme of Transnational Transport Networks, TEN-T. Almost twenty years after its implementation start, and after initial observations on the impacts, some development problems get unexpectedly worst. Moreover, the accessibility role in regional development is not effectively accounted in the actual scientific production and the work devoted to this issue is not significant, even less if devoted to cross-border accessibility. An investigation is starting now in Portugal, using statistical spatial analysis (including spatial regression analysis and spill over analysis), to evaluate how accessibilities from each side of the border influence the other side, and how corresponding municipalities influence each other socio-economically. Using socioeconomic data from the all cross-border extension between Portugal and Spain a model will be calibrated, able to measure the relation between accessibility and development. In an early stage, it is important to look through the behaviour of both sides of the border separately, preparing the modeling process with accuracy. This initial study also prepares the setting for a more complete study including both sides of the border, therefore including Spanish data. This paper presents the spatial behaviour for a set of socioeconomic development variables including accessibility, in all the Portuguese municipalities in the border (including first and second neighbours) and for the periods of 1981-1991 and 1991-2001. This spatial behaviour analysis lead to two main conclusions: some tendencies were previously detected intuitively and this study just confirms it. Other interesting tendencies in the relationship between accessibility and development on the border region were only detected by using spatial analysis techniques. These latter tendencies represent important criteria to account for on the management and planning of existing and future transport infrastructures between the two countries.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by European Regional Science Association in its series ERSA conference papers with number ersa10p456.

    in new window

    Date of creation: Sep 2011
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa10p456
    Contact details of provider: Postal: Welthandelsplatz 1, 1020 Vienna, Austria
    Web page:

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Jes�s Mur & Fernando López & Ana Angulo, 2009. "Testing the hypothesis of stability in spatial econometric models," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 88(2), pages 409-444, 06.
    2. Ezequiel Uriel Jiménez & Francisco Pérez García & Matilde Mas Ivars & Joaquín Maudos Villarroya, 1995. "Infrastructures And Productivity In The Spanish Regions," Working Papers. Serie EC 1995-10, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    3. Forslund, Ulla M & Johansson, Borje, 1995. "Assessing Road Investments: Accessibility Changes, Cost Benefit and Production Effects," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 155-74, May.
    4. David Aschauer, 1988. "Is public expenditure productive?," Staff Memoranda 88-7, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    5. Alfredo M. Pereira & Jorge M. Andraz, 2005. "Public Investment in Transportation Infrastructure and Economic Performance in Portugal," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(2), pages 177-196, 05.
    6. Elena L�pez & Javier Gutiérrez & Gabriel G�mez, 2008. "Measuring Regional Cohesion Effects of Large-scale Transport Infrastructure Investments: An Accessibility Approach," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 277-301, February.
    7. Vickerman, R W, 1995. "The Regional Impacts of Trans-European Networks," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 237-54, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa10p456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Gunther Maier)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.