The firm relocation decision: a logit model
This paper deals with the relocation of firms. There are indications from former research, that age, size and market are determinants of relocated companies. This paper aims to demonstrate that mobile firms are younger, more export oriented and more rapidly growing. With the use of two theories, Location theory and the theory of Organisational Ecology, it is tried to construct a theoretical background for an age-related bias in the decision to relocate. Location theorieexplain from different perspectives the location of economic activities. Spatial movements of firms represent only a small part of industrial change, but it does influence the overall change of production and employment levels. Organisational Ecology deals with the causes of vital events (birth, death and mobility) of firms in the organisational population, because mobility is one of the visible outcomes of the selection process. The theoretical constructs for this decision are tested with the use of the Cranet database that provides information on company relocation in eighteen European countries in 1996-1999. First, a general analysis of the phenomenon in the European countries is presented. Second, the connection between relocation and age, size and market of companies in three example countries (Italy, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom) is described on the basis of the literary review. The findings are in general that when firms grow older they are too large and too embedded in the spatial environment to move. Younger firms are more likely to relocate, because they are expected to have higher growth rates and therefore need more space, one incentive to relocate.
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Pennings, Enrico & Sleuwaegen, Leo, 2000. "International relocation: firm and industry determinants," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 179-186, May.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa02p205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Gunther Maier)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.