IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/11371.html

How Effective Are Emission Trading Systems in Reducing Emissions ? Empirical Evidence from the EU, New Zealand, and the Republic of Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Song, Ze
  • Hochman, Gal
  • Timilsina, Govinda R.

Abstract

Emission trading schemes are among the primary pricing instruments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Currently, more than 35 emission trading schemes are in operation around the world at multinational, national, and subnational levels. How effective these systems are in reducing emissions is a key empirical question. This study examines the effectiveness of three large-scale emission trading schemes implemented by the European Union, New Zealand, and the Republic of Korea in reducing carbon dioxide emissions. The study employs a generalized synthetic control method on data from 2005–20. The findings show that the EU emission trading scheme led to a cumulative reduction of 21.3 percent in carbon dioxide emissions from the electricity sector and 15.6 lower total carbon dioxide emissions, relative to a scenario with no emission trading scheme. In New Zealand, the emission trading scheme had no statistically significant effect on total national carbon dioxide emissions—largely because nearly half of New Zealand’s emissions come from agriculture, a sector not covered by the country’s emission trading scheme. The effectiveness of Korea’s emission trading scheme varied substantially across phases. Although initially it did not halt the rise in emissions, it became a progressively strong driver of decarbonization over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Song, Ze & Hochman, Gal & Timilsina, Govinda R., 2026. "How Effective Are Emission Trading Systems in Reducing Emissions ? Empirical Evidence from the EU, New Zealand, and the Republic of Korea," Policy Research Working Paper Series 11371, The World Bank.
    • Handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:11371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099211005052635069/pdf/IDU-f46114fe-a9b6-4e04-88cb-bb5054ba820b.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ralf Martin & Mirabelle Muûls & Ulrich J. Wagner, 2016. "The Impact of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme on Regulated Firms: What Is the Evidence after Ten Years?," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 10(1), pages 129-148.
    2. Wietze Lise & Jos Sijm & Benjamin Hobbs, 2010. "The Impact of the EU ETS on Prices, Profits and Emissions in the Power Sector: Simulation Results with the COMPETES EU20 Model," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 47(1), pages 23-44, September.
    3. Rafaty, Ryan & Dolphin, Geoffroy & Pretis, Felix, 2025. "Carbon pricing and the elasticity of CO2 emissions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    4. Susan Athey & Mohsen Bayati & Nikolay Doudchenko & Guido Imbens & Khashayar Khosravi, 2021. "Matrix Completion Methods for Causal Panel Data Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 116(536), pages 1716-1730, October.
    5. JÅ«ratÄ— JaraitÄ— & Corrado Di Maria, 2016. "Did the EU ETS Make a Difference? An Empirical Assessment Using Lithuanian Firm-Level Data," The Energy Journal, , vol. 37(2), pages 68-92, April.
    6. Frank Convery, 2009. "Origins and Development of the EU ETS," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 43(3), pages 391-412, July.
    7. Jushan Bai, 2009. "Panel Data Models With Interactive Fixed Effects," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 77(4), pages 1229-1279, July.
    8. repec:aen:journl:ej37-1-jaraite is not listed on IDEAS
    9. repec:dau:papers:123456789/10174 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Brink, Corjan & Vollebergh, Herman R.J. & van der Werf, Edwin, 2016. "Carbon pricing in the EU: Evaluation of different EU ETS reform options," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 603-617.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rafaty, Ryan & Dolphin, Geoffroy & Pretis, Felix, 2025. "Carbon pricing and the elasticity of CO2 emissions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    2. Hainmueller, Jens & Marbach, Moritz & Hangartner, Dominik & Harder, Niklas & Vallizadeh, Ehsan, 2025. "Refugee Labor Market Integration at Scale: Evidence from Germany’s Fast-Track Employment Program," SocArXiv px9ew_v2, Center for Open Science.
    3. Zhentao Shi & Jin Xi & Haitian Xie, 2025. "A Synthetic Business Cycle Approach to Counterfactual Analysis with Nonstationary Macroeconomic Data," Papers 2505.22388, arXiv.org.
    4. Anke, Carl-Philipp & Hobbie, Hannes & Schreiber, Steffi & Möst, Dominik, 2020. "Coal phase-outs and carbon prices: Interactions between EU emission trading and national carbon mitigation policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    5. Ben Deaner & Chen-Wei Hsiang & Andrei Zeleneev, 2025. "Simple Specification-Free Causal Inference in Large Panels," Papers 2503.20769, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2026.
    6. Qili Wang & Liangfei Qiu & Wei Xu, 2024. "Informal Payments and Doctor Engagement in an Online Health Community: An Empirical Investigation Using Generalized Synthetic Control," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 706-726, June.
    7. Xiong, Ruoxuan & Pelger, Markus, 2023. "Large dimensional latent factor modeling with missing observations and applications to causal inference," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 271-301.
    8. Prantik Bagchi & Santosh Kumar Sahu, 2026. "Can the performance, achieve, and trade scheme help Indian manufacturing achieve its net-zero goal?," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 1-32, April.
    9. Binzhi Chen & Annalivia Polselli & Paul S. Clarke, 2026. "Double Machine Learning with High-dimensional Interactive Fixed Effects," Papers 2608.01137, arXiv.org.
    10. Michał Marcin Kobierecki & Michał Pierzgalski, 2022. "Sports Mega-Events and Economic Growth: A Synthetic Control Approach," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 23(5), pages 567-597, June.
    11. Alberto Abadie & Anish Agarwal & Raaz Dwivedi & Abhin Shah, 2024. "Doubly Robust Inference in Causal Latent Factor Models," Papers 2402.11652, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    12. Susan Athey & Guido Imbens & Zhaonan Qu & Davide Viviano, 2025. "Triply Robust Panel Estimators," Papers 2508.21536, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.
    13. Riste Ichev & Rok Spruk, 2026. "Pricing Catastrophe: How Extreme Political Shocks Reprice Sovereign Risk, Beliefs, and Growth Expectations," Papers 2601.20724, arXiv.org.
    14. Timothy B. Armstrong & Martin Weidner & Andrei Zeleneev, 2022. "Robust Estimation and Inference in Panels with Interactive Fixed Effects," Papers 2210.06639, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.
    15. Su, Liangjun & Wang, Fa & Wang, Yiren, 2026. "Estimation and inference for unbalanced panel data models with interactive fixed effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    16. Dechezleprêtre, Antoine & Nachtigall, Daniel & Venmans, Frank, 2023. "The joint impact of the European Union emissions trading system on carbon emissions and economic performance," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    17. Christian Alemán-Pericón & Christopher Busch & Raül Santaeulàlia-Llopis & Tetyana Surovtseva, 2026. "Double Selection in Causal Inference," Working Papers 1604, Barcelona School of Economics.
    18. Andrei Zeleneev & Weisheng Zhang, 2025. "Tractable Estimation of Nonlinear Panels with Interactive Fixed Effects," Papers 2511.15427, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
    19. Yonglei Zhang & Huanchen Tang & Donghai Yan, 2024. "The Impact of Carbon Emission Trading Policy on Industrial Structure Adjustment: A Perspective of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-17, August.
    20. Frédéric Branger & Oskar Lecuyer & Philippe Quirion, 2013. "The European Union Emissions Trading System : should we throw the flagship out with the bathwater ?," Working Papers hal-00866408, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:11371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Roula I. Yazigi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dvewbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.