IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wboper/40080.html

What Do We Know About Interventions to Increase Women’s Economic Participation and Empowerment in South Asia

Author

Listed:
  • Najaf Zahra
  • Amna Javed
  • Ana Maria Munoz Boudet

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Najaf Zahra & Amna Javed & Ana Maria Munoz Boudet, 2023. "What Do We Know About Interventions to Increase Women’s Economic Participation and Empowerment in South Asia," World Bank Publications - Reports 40080, The World Bank Group.
    • Handle: RePEc:wbk:wboper:40080
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstreams/9be83f15-9d72-41a2-a3f7-00251956c6da/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Monica Jain, 2016. "Public pre-schooling and maternal labour force participation in rural India," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 246-263, April.
    2. Haeck, Catherine & Lefebvre, Pierre & Merrigan, Philip, 2015. "Canadian evidence on ten years of universal preschool policies: The good and the bad," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 137-157.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Halim & Hillary C. Johnson & Elizaveta Perova, 2022. "Preschool Availability and Women’s Employment: Evidence from Indonesia," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 71(1), pages 39-61.
    2. Shelley Clark & Caroline W. Kabiru & Sonia Laszlo & Stella Muthuri, 2019. "The Impact of Childcare on Poor Urban Women’s Economic Empowerment in Africa," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 56(4), pages 1247-1272, August.
    3. Tamar Khitarishvili, 2016. "Gender Dimensions of Inequality in the Countries of Central Asia, South Caucasus, and Western CIS," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_858, Levy Economics Institute.
    4. Marie Connolly & Catherine Haeck, 2015. "Are Childcare Subsidies Good for Parental Well-being? Empirical Evidence from Three Countries," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 13(1), pages 09-15, 04.
    5. Benoît Laplante, 2024. "Policy and Fertility, a Case Study of the Quebec Parental Insurance Plan," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 43(3), pages 1-34, June.
    6. Sencer Karademir & Jean-William Laliberté & Stefan Staubli, 2026. "The Multigenerational Impact of Children and Childcare Policies," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 44(1), pages 189-227.
    7. Michael J. Kottelenberg & Steven F. Lehrer, 2018. "Does Quebecs subsidized child care policy give boys and girls an equal start?," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 51(2), pages 627-659, May.
    8. Ágnes Szabó-Morvai & Anna Lovász, 2024. "Where can childcare expansion increase maternal labor supply? A comparison of quasi-experimental estimates from seven countries," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 66(6), pages 2823-2879, June.
    9. Katharine G. Abraham & Melissa S. Kearney, 2020. "Explaining the Decline in the US Employment-to-Population Ratio: A Review of the Evidence," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 58(3), pages 585-643, September.
    10. Claudia Olivetti & Barbara Petrongolo, 2017. "The Economic Consequences of Family Policies: Lessons from a Century of Legislation in High-Income Countries," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(1), pages 205-230, Winter.
    11. Lebihan, Laetitia & Mao Takongmo, Charles-Olivier, 2018. "The impact of universal child benefits on family health and behaviours," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(4), pages 415-427.
    12. Dhanaraj, Sowmya & Mahambare, Vidya, 2019. "Family structure, education and women’s employment in rural India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 17-29.
    13. Susana Martínez-Restrepo & Juan Camilo Mej�a & Erika Enr�quez, 2016. "Eliciting women's willingness to take a job. Evidence from displaced and extremely poor women in Cali, Colombia," Coyuntura Económica, Fedesarrollo, vol. 46(1), pages 149-173.
    14. van Huizen, Thomas & Plantenga, Janneke, 2018. "Do children benefit from universal early childhood education and care? A meta-analysis of evidence from natural experiments," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 206-222.
    15. Laura Ravazzini, 2018. "Childcare and maternal part-time employment: a natural experiment using Swiss cantons," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, Springer;Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics, vol. 154(1), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Carolina Robino & Raquel Tebaldi, 2018. "Women at work: addressing the gaps," Policy In Focus 41, International Policy Centre.
    17. Isabelle Bouchard & Lydia Cheung & Gail Pacheco, 2021. "Evaluating the impact of 20 hours free early childhood education on mothers’ labour force participation and earnings," New Zealand Economic Papers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(2), pages 188-202, May.
    18. Yamaguchi, Shintaro & Asai, Yukiko & Kambayashi, Ryo, 2018. "Effects of subsidized childcare on mothers’ labor supply under a rationing mechanism," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1-17.
    19. Szabó-Morvai, Ágnes & Vonnák, Dzsamila, 2025. "Kisgyermekes anyák munkaerőpiaci helyzetének alakulása középtávon a koronavírus-járványt követő időszakban [Mid-term evolution of the labour market status of mothers with young children in the post-COVID-19 pandemic period]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 50-58.
    20. Lee, Siha & Liu, Sitian, 2024. "Fertility incentives in Canada: A cohort analysis," CLEF Working Paper Series 75, Canadian Labour Economics Forum (CLEF), University of Waterloo.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:wboper:40080. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tal Ayalon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dvewbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.