IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/hdnspu/208678.html

From Pilot to Policy: Analysis and Recommendations to Better Target the Poor in Georgia

Author

Listed:
  • Honorati, Maddalena
  • Carraro, Ludovico
  • Sormani, Roberto Claudio

Abstract

Effectively identifying the poor is critical to the success of many social assistance programs, particularly where public resources are scarce. Proxy means testing (PMT) is a popular method for “targeting” social assistance and has been implemented in a wide variety of countries. This paper responds to Georgia’s request to improve poverty-targeted social assistance (TSA) eligibility and implementation. We re-estimated the PMT model and household needs index using recent HIES data, supported the design and implementation of its pilot and quantitatively evaluated pilot results based on government administrative data. Drawing on pilot evidence, the paper proposes final refinements of the TSA targeting formula and discusses recommendations to effectively implement the revised targeting formula as well as considerations to move towards a means test approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Honorati, Maddalena & Carraro, Ludovico & Sormani, Roberto Claudio, 2026. "From Pilot to Policy: Analysis and Recommendations to Better Target the Poor in Georgia," The Social Policy and Labor Discussion Paper Series 208678, The World Bank.
    • Handle: RePEc:wbk:hdnspu:208678
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099062823065025807/pdf/P177449-48164afc-2896-4258-a306-80bcb4b01cc4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Angus Deaton & Christina Paxson, 1998. "Economies of Scale, Household Size, and the Demand for Food," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 106(5), pages 897-930, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francis Teal, 2006. "Consumption and welfare in Ghana in the 1990s," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(7), pages 1252-1269.
    2. Stevens, Andrew W., 2017. "Quinoa quandary: Cultural tastes and nutrition in Peru," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 132-142.
    3. Mehmet Şahinli & Halil Fidan, 2012. "Estimation of food demand in Turkey: method of an almost ideal demand system," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 653-663, February.
    4. Thaiyoong Penny Mok & Gillis Maclean & Paul Dalziel, 2013. "Alternative Poverty Lines for Malaysia," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 27(1), pages 85-104, March.
    5. Nguyen, Minh Cong & Winters, Paul, 2011. "The impact of migration on food consumption patterns: The case of Vietnam," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 71-87, February.
    6. Murray Leibbrandt & James Levinsohn & Justin McCrary, 2005. "Incomes in South Africa Since the Fall of Apartheid," NBER Working Papers 11384, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Ekaterina Berendeeva & Tatiana Ratnikova, 2016. "The Deaton–Paxson paradox in the consumption of Russian households," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 42, pages 54-74.
    8. Vellore Arthi & James Fenske, 2018. "Polygamy and child mortality: Historical and modern evidence from Nigeria’s Igbo," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 97-141, March.
    9. Climent Quintana-Domeque, 2018. "Introduction to the special issue in honor of Nobel Laureate Angus Deaton: “consumption, poverty and inequality in the household”," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-3, March.
    10. Diane Whitmore, 2002. "What Are Food Stamps Worth?," Working Papers 847, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section..
    11. Chambwera, Muyeye & Folmer, Henk, 2007. "Fuel switching in Harare: An almost ideal demand system approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 2538-2548, April.
    12. David Fielding & Chris Hajzler & Jim MacGee, 2011. "Determinants of Relative Price Variability during a Recession: Evidence from Canada at the Time of the Great Depression," Working Papers 1107, University of Otago, Department of Economics, revised Aug 2011.
    13. Feyza G. Sahinyazan & Marie‐Ève Rancourt & Vedat Verter, 2021. "Food Aid Modality Selection Problem," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(4), pages 965-983, April.
    14. Pierre Bachas & Lucie Gadenne & Anders Jensen, 2024. "Informality, Consumption Taxes, and Redistribution," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 91(5), pages 2604-2634.
    15. Gautam Hazarika & Sourabh Bikas Paul, 2021. "India’s calorie consumption puzzle: insights from the stochastic cost frontier analysis of calorie purchases," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(6), pages 2993-3010, June.
    16. Muhammad Shafiullah & Zhilun Jiao & Muhammad Shahbaz & Kangyin Dong, 2023. "Examining energy poverty in Chinese households: An Engel curve approach," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 149-184, March.
    17. Rossella Calvi & Jacob Penglase & Denni Tommasi & Alexander Wolf, 2020. "Resource Sharing and Scale Economies in Large Families," SoDa Laboratories Working Paper Series 2020-09, Monash University.
    18. Trevon D. Logan, 2011. "Economies Of Scale In The Household: Puzzles And Patterns From The American Past," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 49(4), pages 1008-1028, October.
    19. Bargain, Olivier B. & Donni, Olivier, 2009. "The Measurement of Child Costs: A Rothbarth-Type Method Consistent with Scale Economies," IZA Discussion Papers 4654, IZA Network @ LISER.
    20. Benin, Samuel & Mugarura, Samuel, 2005. "Determinants of change in house-hold level of consumption and poverty in Uganda, 1992/93 - 1999/00," DSGD Discussion Papers 55407, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:hdnspu:208678. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aaron F Buchsbaum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wrldbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.