Wage Bargaining Under the National Labor Relations Act
Sections 8(a)(3) and 8(a)(5) of the National Labor Relations Act prohibit a firm from unilaterally increasing the wage it pays the union during the negotiation of a new wage contract. To understand this regulation, we study a counterfactual model where the firm can unilaterally increase wages during contract negotiations. Comparing this model to the case where the firm must pay the wage from the expired contract, we show that the firm may strategically increase the union's temporary wage to upset the union's incentive to strike and to decrease the union's bargaining power. Consequently, increasing temporary wages may shrink the set of equilibrium contracts in the firm's favor. Indeed, as the union becomes more patient, the set of equilibrium wages converges to the expired wage, the best equilibrium outcome to the firm. We further demonstrate that our counterfactual model is valid since our results maintain even if the union is allowed to block the firm's temporary wage increase.
|Date of creation:||May 2004|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.vanderbilt.edu/econ/wparchive/index.html|
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- repec:cup:cbooks:9780521576475 is not listed on IDEAS
- Martin J. Osborne & Ariel Rubinstein, 2005. "Bargaining and Markets," Levine's Bibliography 666156000000000515, UCLA Department of Economics.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:van:wpaper:0412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (John P. Conley)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.