IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/urv/wpaper/2072-534909.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Distributing the European Union Greenhouse Gas emission 2030

Author

Listed:
  • Salekpay, Foroogh

Abstract

Due to the challenge of global warming, the European Union (EU) signs the Paris agreement (2015) to diminish the total Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emission. Nonetheless, the European Environmental Agency report (EEA, 2019) shows that EU cannot achieve its 2030 target since in the long-term the GHG emission of member states exceed the target emission budget. We propose to distribute the EU 2030 target emission budget among its member states to keep them in the path leading to this year. In doing so, we apply the claims problems approach which is a method to divide a scarce resource among claimants with larger cumulative claims. Keywords: Claims problems, Bankruptcy problems, Paris agreement, Climate change

Suggested Citation

  • Salekpay, Foroogh, 2021. "Distributing the European Union Greenhouse Gas emission 2030," Working Papers 2072/534909, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:urv:wpaper:2072/534909
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2072/534909
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. José-Manuel Giménez-Gómez & Jordi Teixidó-Figueras & Cori Vilella, 2016. "The global carbon budget: a conflicting claims problem," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 136(3), pages 693-703, June.
    2. Dagan, Nir & Volij, Oscar, 1993. "The bankruptcy problem: a cooperative bargaining approach," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 287-297, November.
    3. Pan, Xunzhang & Elzen, Michel den & Höhne, Niklas & Teng, Fei & Wang, Lining, 2017. "Exploring fair and ambitious mitigation contributions under the Paris Agreement goals," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 49-56.
    4. Yann Robiou du Pont & M. Louise Jeffery & Johannes Gütschow & Joeri Rogelj & Peter Christoff & Malte Meinshausen, 2017. "Correction: Corrigendum: Equitable mitigation to achieve the Paris Agreement goals," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(2), pages 153-153, February.
    5. Hervé Moulin, 2000. "Priority Rules and Other Asymmetric Rationing Methods," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 68(3), pages 643-684, May.
    6. Peris, Josep E. & Jiménez-Gómez, José M., 2012. "A Proportional Approach to Bankruptcy Problems with a guaranteed minimum," QM&ET Working Papers 12-7, University of Alicante, D. Quantitative Methods and Economic Theory.
    7. Carl-Friedrich Schleussner & Joeri Rogelj & Michiel Schaeffer & Tabea Lissner & Rachel Licker & Erich M. Fischer & Reto Knutti & Anders Levermann & Katja Frieler & William Hare, 2016. "Science and policy characteristics of the Paris Agreement temperature goal," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(9), pages 827-835, September.
    8. Claire L. Fyson & Susanne Baur & Matthew Gidden & Carl-Friedrich Schleussner, 2020. "Fair-share carbon dioxide removal increases major emitter responsibility," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(9), pages 836-841, September.
    9. Tim Rayner & Andrew Jordan, 2013. "The European Union: the polycentric climate policy leader?," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(2), pages 75-90, March.
    10. Sebastian Oberthür & Lisanne Groen, 2017. "The European Union and the Paris Agreement: leader, mediator, or bystander?," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), January.
    11. Carlos Pozo & Ángel Galán-Martín & David M. Reiner & Niall Dowell & Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez, 2020. "Equity in allocating carbon dioxide removal quotas," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(7), pages 640-646, July.
    12. Aumann, Robert J. & Maschler, Michael, 1985. "Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 195-213, August.
    13. Yann Robiou du Pont & M. Louise Jeffery & Johannes Gütschow & Joeri Rogelj & Peter Christoff & Malte Meinshausen, 2017. "Equitable mitigation to achieve the Paris Agreement goals," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 38-43, January.
    14. Niklas Höhne & Takeshi Kuramochi & Carsten Warnecke & Frauke Röser & Hanna Fekete & Markus Hagemann & Thomas Day & Ritika Tewari & Marie Kurdziel & Sebastian Sterl & Sofia Gonzales, 2017. "The Paris Agreement: resolving the inconsistency between global goals and national contributions," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 16-32, January.
    15. Charles F. Parker & Christer Karlsson, 2017. "The European Union as a global climate leader: confronting aspiration with evidence," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 445-461, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Foroogh Salekpay, 2023. "The Allocation of Greenhouse Gas Emission in European Union through Applying the Claims Problems Approach," Games, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, January.
    2. Jiang, Hong-Dian & Purohit, Pallav & Liang, Qiao-Mei & Dong, Kangyin & Liu, Li-Jing, 2022. "The cost-benefit comparisons of China's and India's NDCs based on carbon marginal abatement cost curves," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    3. Sebastian Cano-Berlanga & María-José Solís-Baltodano & Cori Vilella, 2023. "The Art of Sharing Resources: How to Distribute Water during a Drought Period," Games, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Rick K. Acosta & Encarnación Algaba & Joaquín Sánchez-Soriano, 2022. "Multi-issue bankruptcy problems with crossed claims," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 318(2), pages 749-772, November.
    5. Thomson, William, 2015. "Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: An update," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 41-59.
    6. Emin Karagözoğlu, 2014. "A noncooperative approach to bankruptcy problems with an endogenous estate," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 217(1), pages 299-318, June.
    7. Jingyi Xue, 2018. "Fair division with uncertain needs," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 51(1), pages 105-136, June.
    8. Yong Bian & Zhi Yu & Xuelan Zeng & Jingchun Feng & Chao He, 2018. "Achieving China’s Long-Term Carbon Emission Abatement Targets: A Perspective from Regional Disparity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    9. William Thomson, 2014. "Compromising between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules," RCER Working Papers 584, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
    10. Carmen Herrero & Juan Moreno-Ternero & Giovanni Ponti, 2010. "On the adjudication of conflicting claims: an experimental study," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 34(1), pages 145-179, January.
    11. William Thomson, 2015. "For claims problems, compromising between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 60(3), pages 495-520, November.
    12. William Thomson, 2015. "For claims problems, another compromise between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules," RCER Working Papers 592, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
    13. Acosta-Vega, Rick K. & Algaba, Encarnación & Sánchez-Soriano, Joaquín, 2023. "Design of water quality policies based on proportionality in multi-issue problems with crossed claims," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 777-788.
    14. Hokari, Toru & Thomson, William, 2008. "On properties of division rules lifted by bilateral consistency," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(11), pages 1057-1071, December.
    15. Herrero, Carmen & Villar, Antonio, 2001. "The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 307-328, November.
    16. Stovall, John E., 2014. "Collective rationality and monotone path division rules," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 1-24.
    17. Andrea Gallice, 2019. "Bankruptcy problems with reference-dependent preferences," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 48(1), pages 311-336, March.
    18. Chen, Hao & Qi, Shaozhou & Zhang, Jihong, 2022. "Towards carbon neutrality with Chinese characteristics: From an integrated perspective of economic growth-equity-environment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    19. María José Solíx-Baltodano & Cori Vilella & José Manuel Giménez-Gómez, 2019. "The Catalan Health Budget: A Conflicting Claims Approach," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 228(1), pages 35-54, March.
    20. Thomson, William, 2003. "Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 249-297, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:urv:wpaper:2072/534909. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ariadna Casals (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deurves.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.