IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/unm/umamer/2002027.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Blending Words & Numbers: Towards a Framework for Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Strategies for Organizational Research

Author

Listed:
  • Hertog, Friso den

    (MERIT)

Abstract

Blending qualitative and quantitative research methods is widely propagatedas a strategy for both quality control and enrichment of organizationresearch. This has been recognized in the organization literature for morethan twenty years. However, during the last decade the progress in thepractice of research has not been altogether impressive. Ambiguity is one ofthe key problems in this respect. This paper tries to clarify the discussion onblended methods, by (1) clarifying concepts used to describe blendeddesign, (2) inventoririzing and categorizing the different forms and objectivesof blended design, and (3) developing a provisional framework. The studydeparts from the research practice, the sequences of action in concretestudies. The focus is on research as a process, rather than on specificmethods. Finally, the paper suggest some directions for a developmentprogram for blending methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Hertog, Friso den, 2002. "Blending Words & Numbers: Towards a Framework for Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Strategies for Organizational Research," Research Memorandum 027, Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    • Handle: RePEc:unm:umamer:2002027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://unu-merit.nl/publications/rmpdf/2002/rm2002-027.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dorothy Leonard-Barton, 1990. "A Dual Methodology for Case Studies: Synergistic Use of a Longitudinal Single Site with Replicated Multiple Sites," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(3), pages 248-266, August.
    2. Dieter Grunow, 1995. "The Research Design in Organization Studies: Problems and Prospects," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 93-103, February.
    3. Peter Swanborn, 1996. "A common base for quality control criteria in quantitative and qualitative research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 19-35, February.
    4. William H. Glick & George P. Huber & C. Chet Miller & D. Harold Doty & Kathleen M. Sutcliffe, 1990. "Studying Changes in Organizational Design and Effectiveness: Retrospective Event Histories and Periodic Assessments," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(3), pages 293-312, August.
    5. Andrew M. Pettigrew, 1990. "Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(3), pages 267-292, August.
    6. Peter Geurts & Hans Roosendaal, 2001. "Estimating the Direction of Innovative Change Based on Theory and Mixed Methods," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 407-427, November.
    7. Richard L. Daft & Arie Y. Lewin, 1990. "Can Organization Studies Begin to Break Out of the Normal Science Straitjacket? An Editorial Essay," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(1), pages 1-9, February.
    8. Joanna Sale & Lynne Lohfeld & Kevin Brazil, 2002. "Revisiting the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 43-53, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hertog, Friso den, 2002. "Learning by Doing Organization Research: Inside Views from a Dutch Nephew," Research Memorandum 043, Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    2. De Massis, Alfredo & Kotlar, Josip, 2014. "The case study method in family business research: Guidelines for qualitative scholarship," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 15-29.
    3. repec:thr:techub:10028:y:2022:i:1:p:170-202 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Islam, A.K.M. Najmul & Mäntymäki, Matti & Turunen, Marja, 2019. "Why do blockchains split? An actor-network perspective on Bitcoin splits," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    5. Paola Perez-Aleman, 2011. "Collective Learning in Global Diffusion: Spreading Quality Standards in a Developing Country Cluster," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 173-189, February.
    6. Yakob, Ramsin & Nakamura, H. Richard & Ström, Patrik, 2018. "Chinese foreign acquisitions aimed for strategic asset-creation and innovation upgrading: The case of Geely and Volvo Cars," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 70, pages 59-72.
    7. Luca Ferrucci & Simone Guercini, 2013. "Le medie imprese tra continuit? strategica e cambiamento nella crisi economica mondiale," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(3), pages 11-24.
    8. Sköld, Martin, 2008. "Knowledge Development Patterns In Radically New Product Architectures," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Business Administration 2008:8, Stockholm School of Economics, revised 18 Nov 2008.
    9. Kevin J. Dooley & Andrew H. Van de Ven, 1999. "Explaining Complex Organizational Dynamics," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 358-372, June.
    10. Jose G. Vargas-Hernandez, M.B.A., 2014. "Research Methodology Strategies In Strategic Management," Interdisciplinary Management Research, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 10, pages 106-147.
    11. Bastien Soulé & Julie Hallé & Eric Boutroy & Bénédicte Vignal, 2023. "Revisiting innovation: the organizational vulnerability of small or medium companies innovating in the outdoor sports sector," Working Papers hal-03360833, HAL.
    12. Estrin, Saul & Gozman, Daniel & Khavul, Susanna, 2017. "Equity crowdfunding and early stage entrepreneurial finance: damaging or disruptive?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 86590, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Trish Reay & Samia Chreim & Karen Golden-Biddle & Elizabeth Goodrick & B. E. (Bernie) Williams & Ann Casebeer & Amy Pablo & C. R. (Bob) Hinings, 2013. "Transforming New Ideas into Practice: An Activity Based Perspective on the Institutionalization of Practices," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(6), pages 963-990, September.
    14. Giulio Caldarelli & Cecilia Rossignoli & Alessandro Zardini, 2020. "Overcoming the Blockchain Oracle Problem in the Traceability of Non-Fungible Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, March.
    15. Zeng, Jing & Khan, Zaheer & De Silva, Muthu, 2019. "The emergence of multi-sided platform MNEs: Internalization theory and networks," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 1-1.
    16. Butler, Bella & Soontiens, Werner, 2015. "Offshoring of higher education services in strategic nets: A dynamic capabilities perspective," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 477-490.
    17. Bastien Soulé & Julie Hallé & Eric Boutroy & Bénédicte Vignal, 2023. "Revisiting innovation: the organizational vulnerability of small or medium companies innovating in the outdoor sports sector," Post-Print hal-03360833, HAL.
    18. Stephen Gorard & Yiyi Tan, 2022. "The difficulty of making claims to knowledge in social science," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 28(1), pages 170-202, February.
    19. C. Poortman & K. Schildkamp, 2012. "Alternative quality standards in qualitative research?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 1727-1751, October.
    20. Bice Della Piana & Alessandra Vecchi & Vittoria Marino & Mario D Arco, 2021. "How do Family Firms Grow? The Strategic Goals of Innovation and Internationalization," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(2), pages 1-1, July.
    21. Hervé Dumez, 1992. "Actes du séminaire Contradictions et Dynamique des Organisations - CONDOR - III," Post-Print hal-00263275, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    economics of technology ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:unm:umamer:2002027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Leonne Portz (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/meritnl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.