IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v6y1995i1p93-103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Research Design in Organization Studies: Problems and Prospects

Author

Listed:
  • Dieter Grunow

    (University of Duisburg, Gesamthochschule, P.O. Box 101503, D-47048, Duisburg, Germany)

Abstract

The paper is concerned with problems of research methodology in organization studies. It places the main emphasis on the “research design,” which is seen as an important tool for the planning, the substantiation and the practical guidance of research procedures. The explicit discussion and improvement of research designs is proposed to be a major contribution also to concept and theory development in Organization Science. The basic content of the paper is an empirical analysis and evaluation of the status quo in design conceptions for organization studies. For this, some 300 empirical studies (in German and English) have been critically reviewed, 74 of them described in detail. The results show many deficiencies in the elaboration of the research designs, especially the ties between design and theory (or research question) are often weak or unclear. But there are also good examples which can be used as starting points for further improvements. The development over time shows shifts toward more reflection/discussion of available alternatives in the methods of data collection and more critical examinations of the data quality. This also leads to increasing applications of multi-method designs. A comparison between German and US studies show differences along the quantitative-qualitative line, which opens chances of mutual learning processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Dieter Grunow, 1995. "The Research Design in Organization Studies: Problems and Prospects," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 93-103, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:6:y:1995:i:1:p:93-103
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.6.1.93
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.1.93
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.6.1.93?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kevin J. Dooley & Andrew H. Van de Ven, 1999. "Explaining Complex Organizational Dynamics," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 358-372, June.
    2. Hertog, Friso den, 2002. "Blending Words & Numbers: Towards a Framework for Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Strategies for Organizational Research," Research Memorandum 027, Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    3. Alberto Cerezo-Narváez & Andrés Pastor-Fernández & Manuel Otero-Mateo & Pablo Ballesteros-Pérez & Francisco Rodríguez-Pecci, 2021. "Knowledge as an Organizational Asset for Managing Complex Projects: The Case of Naval Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Hertog, Friso den, 2002. "Learning by Doing Organization Research: Inside Views from a Dutch Nephew," Research Memorandum 043, Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    5. Bonache, Jaime, 1998. "Los estudios de casos como estrategia de investigación : características, críticas y defensas," DEE - Documentos de Trabajo. Economía de la Empresa. DB 6395, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía de la Empresa.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:6:y:1995:i:1:p:93-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.