IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v1y1990i3p293-312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Studying Changes in Organizational Design and Effectiveness: Retrospective Event Histories and Periodic Assessments

Author

Listed:
  • William H. Glick

    (Graduate School of Business, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712)

  • George P. Huber

    (Graduate School of Business, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712)

  • C. Chet Miller

    (Hankamer School of Business, Baylor University, Waco, Texas 76798)

  • D. Harold Doty

    (Department of Management, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701)

  • Kathleen M. Sutcliffe

    (Graduate School of Business, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712)

Abstract

This paper describes assumptions, rationale, and track-offs involved in designing the research methodology used in a longitudinal study of the relationships among changes in organizational contexts, designs, and effectiveness. The basic research question concerns when how, and why do different types of organizational change occur. Given this research question and a desire to develop and test generalizable theory about changes in organizational design and effectiveness, we conducted a longitudinal study of over 100 organizations. Data concerning the changes were obtained through four interviews spaced six months apart with the top manager in each organization. Each interview provided a short-term retrospective event history over the preceding 6-month interval in aggregate, the four interviews provided a 24-month event history for each organization. Additionally, periodic assessments of the state of the organization's context, design, and effectiveness were collected with two questionnaires spaced one year apart. Finally, in each organization, the top manager's personal characteristics were assessed after all other data were obtained. This paper examines the alternatives, advantages, and disadvantages of the research design decisions. With some hindsight, we also offer some suggestions for future researchers with similar goals of developing and testing generalizable explanations of change processes in organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • William H. Glick & George P. Huber & C. Chet Miller & D. Harold Doty & Kathleen M. Sutcliffe, 1990. "Studying Changes in Organizational Design and Effectiveness: Retrospective Event Histories and Periodic Assessments," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(3), pages 293-312, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:1:y:1990:i:3:p:293-312
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1.3.293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1.3.293
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.1.3.293?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:1:y:1990:i:3:p:293-312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.