IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ulb/ulbeco/2013-349602.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A social network analysis of mangrove management stakeholders in Sri Lanka's Northern Province

Author

Listed:
  • Thanne Mafaziya Nijamdeen
  • Jean Huge
  • Hajaniaina Ratsimbazafy
  • Kodikara Arachchilage Sunanda Kodikara
  • Farid Dahdouh-Guebas

Abstract

The sustainable management of complex social-ecological systems (SES) typically requires coordination and collaboration between various groups of stakeholders. Yet, research on collaborative stakeholder networks and their linkages with sustainable mangrove management strategies is lacking in Sri Lanka. This study presents a social network analysis (SNA) of mangrove management stakeholders and their perceptions of both existing and preferred collaborative relationships (or ties) between stakeholder groups, in the Northern Province of Sri Lanka. It further illustrates how SNA can be used to identify stakeholder collaboration and their potential role(s) in mangrove management. The perspectives of all key stakeholders have an impact on how mangroves need to be managed. Therefore, it is crucial to identify and meet with all key stakeholders in the early stages of management processes to understand their needs and constraints. Our findings indicate that the government departments mandated to conserve mangroves are not only formally appointed key stakeholders but are also perceived as central by others. Communication barriers, lack of awareness regarding the importance of mangroves, and shortages in staff and resources for conservation were major constraints to the existing mangrove management network. We highlight the potential of other stakeholders (i.e. non-mandated government stakeholders, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and private organizations) in improving and influencing the social network in order to increase the diffusion of information. Despite existing resource extraction activities, private organizations were less represented in the mangrove management network of our study. After considering stakeholders’ expectations and requirements, we suggest the inclusion of a bridging organization such as an “Environment Network Unit” or the establishment of bridging entities in the universities and research institutes. We also recommend certain government organizations (i.e. Central Environmental Authority) to take up the role of bridging. This may help to facilitate the incorporation of relatively marginalized stakeholders in an effort to foster sustainable mangrove management in the Northern Province of Sri Lanka and beyond.

Suggested Citation

  • Thanne Mafaziya Nijamdeen & Jean Huge & Hajaniaina Ratsimbazafy & Kodikara Arachchilage Sunanda Kodikara & Farid Dahdouh-Guebas, 2022. "A social network analysis of mangrove management stakeholders in Sri Lanka's Northern Province," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/349602, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    • Handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/349602
    Note: SCOPUS: ar.j
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/349602/3/MafaziyaNijamdeenetal_2022_OceanCoastManage.pdf
    File Function: Full text for the whole work, or for a work part
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Melindi-Ghidi, Paolo & Dedeurwaerdere, Tom & Fabbri, Giorgio, 2020. "Using environmental knowledge brokers to promote deep green agri-environment measures," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    2. Steven E. Orchard & Lindsay C. Stringer & Claire H. Quinn, 2015. "Environmental Entitlements: Institutional Influence on Mangrove Social-Ecological Systems in Northern Vietnam," Resources, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-36, November.
    3. Hoff P.D. & Raftery A.E. & Handcock M.S., 2002. "Latent Space Approaches to Social Network Analysis," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 97, pages 1090-1098, December.
    4. Ranjith Bandara, 2009. "The Practice of Ecotourism in Sri Lanka," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 10(2), pages 471-492, July.
    5. Riyanto, Yohanes E. & Jonathan, Yeo X.W., 2018. "Directed trust and trustworthiness in a social network: An experimental investigation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 234-253.
    6. Derek Walker & Lynda Margaret Bourne & Arthur Shelley, 2008. "Influence, stakeholder mapping and visualization," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(6), pages 645-658.
    7. Grant Savage & Michele Bunn & Barbara Gray & Qian Xiao & Sijun Wang & Elizabeth Wilson & Eric Williams, 2010. "Stakeholder Collaboration: Implications for Stakeholder Theory and Practice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 21-26, August.
    8. Judy Stewart & Mary Ellen Tyler, 2019. "Bridging organizations and strategic bridging functions in environmental governance and management," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 71-94, January.
    9. Scott, John, 1988. "Social Network Analysis and Intercorporate Relations," Hitotsubashi Journal of commerce and management, Hitotsubashi University, vol. 23(1), pages 53-68, December.
    10. Purnomo, Herry & Kusumadewi, Sonya D. & Ilham, Qori P. & Puspitaloka, Dyah & Hayati, Durrah & Sanjaya, Made & Okarda, Beni & Dewi, Sonya & Dermawan, Ahmad & Brady, Michael A., 2021. "A political-economy model to reduce fire and improve livelihoods in Indonesia's lowlands," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    11. Kleinschmit, Daniela & Pülzl, Helga & Secco, Laura & Sergent, Arnaud & Wallin, Ida, 2018. "Orchestration in political processes: Involvement of experts, citizens, and participatory professionals in forest policy making," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 4-15.
    12. Richard Cudney-Bueno & Xavier Basurto, 2009. "Lack of Cross-Scale Linkages Reduces Robustness of Community-Based Fisheries Management," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(7), pages 1-8, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diego F. Uribe & Isabel Ortiz-Marcos & Ángel Uruburu, 2018. "What Is Going on with Stakeholder Theory in Project Management Literature? A Symbiotic Relationship for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Richter, Andries & Dakos, Vasilis, 2015. "Profit fluctuations signal eroding resilience of natural resources," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 12-21.
    3. Laleh Tafakori & Armin Pourkhanali & Riccardo Rastelli, 2022. "Measuring systemic risk and contagion in the European financial network," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 345-389, July.
    4. Mark S. Handcock & Adrian E. Raftery & Jeremy M. Tantrum, 2007. "Model‐based clustering for social networks," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 170(2), pages 301-354, March.
    5. Ian E. Fellows & Mark S. Handcock, 2023. "Modeling of networked populations when data is sampled or missing," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 81(1), pages 21-35, April.
    6. Samrachana Adhikari & Beau Dabbs, 2018. "Social Network Analysis in R: A Software Review," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 43(2), pages 225-253, April.
    7. Guang Ouyang & Dipak K. Dey & Panpan Zhang, 2020. "Clique-Based Method for Social Network Clustering," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 37(1), pages 254-274, April.
    8. Zhong, Xiang & Liu, Jiajun & Gao, Yong & Wu, Lun, 2017. "Analysis of co-occurrence toponyms in web pages based on complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 466(C), pages 462-475.
    9. Yuan, Quan & Liu, Binghui, 2021. "Community detection via an efficient nonconvex optimization approach based on modularity," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    10. Samrachana Adhikari & Tracy Sweet & Brian Junker, 2021. "Analysis of longitudinal advice‐seeking networks following implementation of high stakes testing," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 184(4), pages 1475-1500, October.
    11. Chung, Jaewon & Bridgeford, Eric & Arroyo, Jesus & Pedigo, Benjamin D. & Saad-Eldin, Ali & Gopalakrishnan, Vivek & Xiang, Liang & Priebe, Carey E. & Vogelstein, Joshua T., 2020. "Statistical Connectomics," OSF Preprints ek4n3, Center for Open Science.
    12. Falk Bräuning & Siem Jan Koopman, 2016. "The dynamic factor network model with an application to global credit risk," Working Papers 16-13, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    13. Jamie Olson & Kathleen Carley, 2013. "Exact and approximate EM estimation of mutually exciting hawkes processes," Statistical Inference for Stochastic Processes, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 63-80, April.
    14. Grüner Sven, 2020. "Sample Size Calculation in Economic Experiments," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 240(6), pages 791-823, December.
    15. Chih‐Sheng Hsieh & Lung‐Fei Lee & Vincent Boucher, 2020. "Specification and estimation of network formation and network interaction models with the exponential probability distribution," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 11(4), pages 1349-1390, November.
    16. West, Robert M. & House, Allan O. & Keen, Justin & Ward, Vicky L., 2015. "Using the structure of social networks to map inter-agency relationships in public health services," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 107-114.
    17. Chiara Di Maria & Antonino Abbruzzo & Gianfranco Lovison, 2022. "Networks as mediating variables: a Bayesian latent space approach," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 31(4), pages 1015-1035, October.
    18. Yu Gan & Tao Xu & NengRui Xu & JiLv Xu & Dan Qiao, 2021. "How Environmental Awareness and Knowledge Affect Urban Residents’ Willingness to Participate in Rubber Plantation Ecological Restoration Programs: Evidence from Hainan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    19. Xiao-Li Meng, 2016. "Discussion: Should a Working Model Actually Work?," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 84(3), pages 362-367, December.
    20. An‐Pang Wang & Che‐Wei Chang & Juin‐Ming Tsai & Shiu‐Wan Hung, 2021. "A performance evaluation of Major League Baseball teams: An integrated social network and data envelopment analysis," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(6), pages 1421-1434, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Co-management; Collaborative governance; Decision-making; Governance Perspectives; Power distribution;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/349602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsulbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.