IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tin/wpaper/20250028.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Retiring the Store Flyer: Effects of Ceasing Print Store Flyers on Household Grocery Shopping Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Arjen van Lin

    (Tilburg University)

  • Kristopher Keller

    (University of North Carolina)

  • Jonne Guyt

    (University of Amsterdam and Tinbergen Institute)

Abstract

Print store flyers, featuring a retailer’s assortment and promotions, are still widely used. Yet increasing digital engagement and sustainability targets have many retailers rethinking whether they should actively distribute these flyers door-to-door. At the same time, retailers are worried about ceasing the distribution of a key marketing tool and whether digital alternatives are equally effective. This study analyzes grocery retailer Lidl’s decision to retire its print flyer in one province of the Netherlands using household scanner data and a purpose-designed survey on the adoption of digital alternatives. The results of a synthetic difference-in-differences analysis reveal that, although the same information is available digitally, households engage in fewer shopping trips and spend less after they stop receiving the print flyer (compared with households in other provinces). No specific retailer benefits from the change; households essentially reallocated purchases to a primary retailer they already visited regularly. Notably, if households primarily shop at Lidl, they do not change their shopping behavior. Promoting digital alternatives cannot offset the negative effect, because even if households adopt a digital alternative, they turn away. Overall, retiring the print flyer may backfire and promoting digital alternatives does not seem effective for households that did not adopt them before.

Suggested Citation

  • Arjen van Lin & Kristopher Keller & Jonne Guyt, 2025. "Retiring the Store Flyer: Effects of Ceasing Print Store Flyers on Household Grocery Shopping Behavior," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 25-028/XII, Tinbergen Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20250028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.tinbergen.nl/25028.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20250028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tinbenl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.