IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rco/dpaper/552.html

The Elusive Returns to AI Skills: Evidence from a Field Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Teo Firpo

    (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin)

  • Lukas Niemann

    (Tanso Technologies)

  • Anastasia Danilov

    (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin)

Abstract

As firms increasingly adopt Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, how they adjust hiring practices for skilled workers remains unclear. This paper investigates whether AI-related skills are rewarded in talent recruitment by conducting a large-scale correspondence study in the United Kingdom. We submit 1,185 résumés to vacancies across a range of occupations, randomly assigning the presence or absence of advanced AI-related qualifications. These AI qualifications are added to résumés as voluntary signals and not explicitly requested in the job postings. We find no statistically significant effect of listing AI qualifications in résumés on interview callback rates. However, a heterogeneity analysis reveals some positive and significant effects for positions in Engineering and Marketing. These results are robust to controlling for the total number of skills listed in job ads, the degree of match between résumés and job descriptions, and the level of expertise required. In an exploratory analysis, we find stronger employer responses to AI-related skills in industries with lower exposure to AI technologies. These findings suggest that the labor market valuation of AI-related qualifications is context-dependent and shaped by sectoral innovation dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Teo Firpo & Lukas Niemann & Anastasia Danilov, 2025. "The Elusive Returns to AI Skills: Evidence from a Field Experiment," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 552, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    • Handle: RePEc:rco:dpaper:552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rationality-and-competition.de/wp-content/uploads/discussion_paper/552.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alekseeva, Liudmila & Azar, José & Giné, Mireia & Samila, Sampsa & Taska, Bledi, 2021. "The demand for AI skills in the labor market," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    2. Dieter Verhaest & Elene Bogaert & Jeroen Dereymaeker & Laura Mestdagh & Stijn Baert, 2018. "Do Employers Prefer Overqualified Graduates? A Field Experiment," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 361-388, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fabian Stephany & Ole Teutloff & Angelo Leone, 2026. "AI Skills Improve Job Prospects: Causal Evidence from a Hiring Experiment," Papers 2601.13286, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tao Chen & Shuwen Pi & Qing Sophie Wang, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence and Corporate Investment Efficiency: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Working Papers in Economics 25/05, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
    2. Tian, Yingying & Zhu, Delong & Nazar, Raima & Ali, Sajid & Mirza, Aboubakar, 2026. "From algorithms to access: Role of artificial intelligence in revolutionizing financial inclusion," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    3. Andrei Ternikov, 2023. "Skill preferences in job postings," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 43(4), pages 1928-1943.
    4. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Li, Jiangnan & Yan, Jingyang, 2025. "Can artificial intelligence contribute to the new energy system? Based on the perspective of labor supply," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    5. Anna-Maria Kanzola, 2024. "The Knowledge Content of the Greek Production Structure in the Aftermath of the Greek Crisis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 936-957, March.
    6. Stijn Baert & Dieter Verhaest, 2021. "Work Hard or Play Hard? Degree Class, Student Leadership and Employment Opportunities," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 83(4), pages 1024-1047, August.
    7. Rude, Britta & Giesing, Yvonne, 2022. "Technological Change and Immigration - A Race for Talent or of Displaced Workers," VfS Annual Conference 2022 (Basel): Big Data in Economics 264093, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    8. Baert, By Stijn & Neyt, Brecht & Siedler, Thomas & Tobback, Ilse & Verhaest, Dieter, 2021. "Student internships and employment opportunities after graduation: A field experiment," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    9. Tim Hinks, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence Perceptions and Life Satisfaction," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 1-14, February.
    10. Pham, Tho & Talavera, Oleksandr & Wu, Zhuangchen, 2023. "Labor markets during war time: Evidence from online job advertisements," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 1316-1333.
    11. Wang, Canghong & Nazar, Raima & Ali, Sajid & Meo, Muhammad Saeed, 2025. "Eco-friendly algorithms: Artificial intelligence and green finance in European intelligent nations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    12. Zhou, Ruizhu, 2024. "Industry concentration and workers’ wage levels," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    13. Konstantinos Pouliakas & Giulia Santangelo & Paul Dupire, 2025. "Are artificial intelligence skills a reward or a gamble? Deconstructing the AI wage premium in Europe," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 15(4), pages 1091-1128, December.
    14. Anton Ludwig Bonin & Pawel Robert Smolinski & Jacek Winiarski, 2025. "Exploring the Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Software Development in the IT Sector: Preliminary Findings on Productivity, Efficiency and Job Security," Papers 2508.16811, arXiv.org.
    15. Wang, Zongrun & Zhang, Taiyu & Ren, Xiaohang & Shi, Yukun, 2024. "AI adoption rate and corporate green innovation efficiency: Evidence from Chinese energy companies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    16. Ciaschi, Matias & Falcone, Guillermo & Garganta, Santiago & Gasparini, Leonardo & Bertín, Octavio & Ramírez-Leira, Lucía, 2025. "The Potential Distributive Impact of AI-driven Labor Changes in Latin America," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 14253, Inter-American Development Bank.
    17. Sharique Hasan & Alexander Oettl & Sampsa Samila, 2025. "From Model Design to Organizational Design: Complexity Redistribution and Trade-Offs in Generative AI," Papers 2506.22440, arXiv.org.
    18. Fontanelli, Luca & Guerini, Mattia & Miniaci, Raffaele & Secchi, Angelo, 2025. "Predictive AI and productivity growth dynamics: Evidence from French firms," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    19. Koch, Michael & Lodefalk, Magnus, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence and Worker Stress: Evidence from Germany," Ratio Working Papers 377, The Ratio Institute.
    20. Josten, Cecily & Krause, Helen & Lordan, Grace & Yeung, Brian, 2024. "What skills pay more? The changing demand and return to skills for professional workers," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121450, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • J23 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Demand
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • I26 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Returns to Education

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rco:dpaper:552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Viviana Lalli (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rationality-and-competition.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.