IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pre/wpaper/202307.html

Quantifying the Economic Effects of Land Reform Policy in South Africa: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Khumbuzile C. Mosoma

    (Department of Economics, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield 0028, South Africa)

  • Heinrich R. Bohlmann

    (Department of Economics, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield 0028, South Africa)

  • Sifiso M. Ntombela

    (National Agricultural Marketing Council)

  • Renee van Eyden

    (Department of Economics, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield 0028, South Africa)

Abstract

Although South Africa has implemented several land reform policies and farmer development support programmes, little progress has been achieved in bridging the inequality gap between mainly black emerging and mainly white established farmers. This study seeks to quantify the effects of land reform policy in South Africa using a dynamic computable general equilibrium (CGE) model. The study simulates two policy scenarios. The first policy scenario assumes that the current land reform approach will continue where government transfers land, but without transitional farmer support to improve the productivity of new farmers. The second policy scenario assumes that the state will additionally allocate transitional farmer support to new farmers, including those operating on land-reform farms and in the former homeland areas. The results reveal that the effects of land reform policy are minimal but positive at the aggregate economic level across the two scenarios. Achieving a land reform target of 30 percent will benefit the real GDP by R242.4 million under scenario 1 and R608.6 million under scenario 2 by the end of the simulation period. There is also a positive effect on selected macroeconomic indicators such as imports, employment, and investment, notably when comprehensive support services are provided. Primary industries like field crops, horticulture, and livestock experience significant output gains. Similar to industrial output, exports for the primary agricultural industries are impacted positively in the long term as new land is made available, making more output available for the export market. Although the implementation of land reform might be a costly exercise initially, it can be achieved at a lower cost than what is assumed or expected. Simulation results suggest that land redistribution will not harm the economy if accompanied by comprehensive farmer support. The study recommends that the government and the private sector work together to create a just and inclusive agricultural landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Khumbuzile C. Mosoma & Heinrich R. Bohlmann & Sifiso M. Ntombela & Renee van Eyden, 2023. "Quantifying the Economic Effects of Land Reform Policy in South Africa: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis," Working Papers 202307, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:pre:wpaper:202307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://drupalwebprod-files.up.ac.za/Public/media/83/documents/inline/39875/wp_2023_07.zp233317.pdf?VersionId=iIR4R5ISWK.RE8jI_c.SC9NKPZ6eJBxQ
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dixon, Peter B. & Koopman, Robert B. & Rimmer, Maureen T., 2013. "The MONASH Style of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling: A Framework for Practical Policy Analysis," Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, in: Peter B. Dixon & Dale Jorgenson (ed.), Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 23-103, Elsevier.
    2. Liebenberg, Frikkie & Pardey, Philip & Beddow, Jason & Kirsten, Johann, 2016. "Re-Estimating South African Agricultural Output Value, Quantity And Price Aggregates, 1910–2010," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 54(4), March.
    3. Julian May & Thildé Stevens & Annareth Stols, 2002. "Monitoring the Impact of Land Reform on Quality of Life: A South African Case Study," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 293-312, June.
    4. Liebenberg, Frikkie & Pardey, Philip G., 2012. "A long-run view of South African agricultural production and productivity," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 7(01), pages 1-25, October.
    5. Sifiso M. Ntombela & Heinrich R. Bohlmann & Mmatlou W. Kalaba, 2019. "Greening the South Africa’s Economy Could Benefit the Food Sector: Evidence from a Carbon Tax Policy Assessment," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 74(2), pages 891-910, October.
    6. Khumbuzile C. Mosoma & Renee van Eyden & Heinrich R. Bohlmann, 2023. "Measuring Total Factor Productivity in the South African Agricultural Sector Using a Growth Accounting Framework," Working Papers 202306, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    7. Litha Magingxa & Zerihun Alemu & Herman van Schalkwyk, 2009. "Factors influencing access to produce markets for smallholder irrigators in South Africa," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 47-58.
    8. Binswanger, Hans P. & Deininger, Klaus & Feder, Gershon, 1995. "Power, distortions, revolt and reform in agricultural land relations," Handbook of Development Economics, in: Hollis Chenery & T.N. Srinivasan (ed.), Handbook of Development Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 42, pages 2659-2772, Elsevier.
    9. Ruth Hall & Thembela Kepe, 2017. "Elite capture and state neglect: new evidence on South Africa’s land reform," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(151), pages 122-130, January.
    10. Karol Boudreaux, 2010. "Land Reform As Social Justice: The Case Of South Africa," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 13-20, March.
    11. Nick Vink & Beatrice Conradie & Nicolette Matthews, 2022. "The Economics of Agricultural Productivity in South Africa," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 14(1), pages 131-149, October.
    12. Bohlmann, H.R. & Van Heerden, J.H. & Dixon, P.B. & Rimmer, M.T., 2015. "The impact of the 2014 platinum mining strike in South Africa: An economy-wide analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 403-411.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pawarid Piyajitmetta & Nattapong Puttanapong, 2025. "Economy-wide effects of the land redistribution policies in Thailand: a computable general equilibrium model," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 1-24, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bohlmann, Jessika & Bohlmann, Heinrich & Inglesi-Lotz, Roula & van Heerden, Jan, 2016. "An economy-wide evaluation of new power generation in South Africa: The case of Medupi and Kusile," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 450-460.
    2. Vladimir Zybatov, 2018. "Strategic Planning of Energy-Efficient Development of a Region of the Russian Federation," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 941-954.
    3. Nomfundo Mabuza, Nosipho, 2016. "Socio-economic impact of land reform projects benefiting from the Recapitalisation and Development Programme in South Africa," Research Theses 243471, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    4. Jessica A. Bohlmann & Heinrich R. Bohlmann & Roula Inglesi-Lotz, 2015. "An Economy-Wide Evaluation of New Power Generation in South Africa: The Case of Kusile and Medupi," Working Papers 201540, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    5. Khumbuzile C. Mosoma & Renee van Eyden & Heinrich R. Bohlmann, 2023. "Measuring Total Factor Productivity in the South African Agricultural Sector Using a Growth Accounting Framework," Working Papers 202306, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    6. Jessika A. Bohlmann & Roula Inglesi-Lotz & Heinrich R. Bohlmann, 2022. "Carbon Tax and its Impact on South African Households," Working Papers 202248, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    7. Jan H van Heerden, 2020. "The Possible Effects of the Extended Lockdown Period on the South African Economy: A CGE Analysis," Working Papers 202042, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    8. Boubacar, Inoussa & Nene, Gibson, 2024. "Land to the landless: Does the type of approach matter?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    9. Alston Lee J. & Mueller Bernardo, 2018. "Priests, Conflicts and Property Rights: the Impacts on Tenancy and Land Use in Brazil," Man and the Economy, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 1-26, June.
    10. Gilligan, Daniel O., 1998. "Farm Size, Productivity, And Economic Efficiency: Accounting For Differences In Efficiency Of Farms By Size In Honduras," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20918, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. Bohlmann, H.R. & Horridge, J.M. & Inglesi-Lotz, R. & Roos, E.L. & Stander, L., 2019. "Regional employment and economic growth effects of South Africa’s transition to low-carbon energy supply mix," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 830-837.
    12. Klaus Deininger & Denys Nizalov & Sudhir K Singh, 2013. "Are mega-farms the future of global agriculture? Exploring the farm size-productivity relationship for large commercial farms in Ukraine," Discussion Papers 49, Kyiv School of Economics.
    13. Grimm, Michael & Klasen, Stephan, 2007. "Geography vs. Institutions at the Village Level," Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Göttingen 2007 9, Verein für Socialpolitik, Research Committee Development Economics.
    14. Foley-Fisher, Nathan & McLaughlin, Eoin, 2016. "Capitalising on the Irish land question: land reform and state banking in Ireland, 1891–1938," Financial History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 71-109, April.
    15. Leonardo A. Lanzona, 2007. "The Determination of Contracts in Agricultural Economies," Development Economics Working Papers 22641, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    16. Falkinger, Josef & Grossmann, Volker, 2013. "Oligarchic land ownership, entrepreneurship, and economic development," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 206-215.
    17. Dixon, Peter & Rimmer, Maureen, 2021. "A GTAP Historical Simulation from 2004 to 2014," Conference papers 333258, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    18. Daniel Ayalew Ali & Stefan Dercon & Madhur Gautam, 2011. "Property rights in a very poor country: tenure insecurity and investment in Ethiopia," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 42(1), pages 75-86, January.
    19. Assuncao, Juliano J. & Ghatak, Maitreesh, 2003. "Can unobserved heterogeneity in farmer ability explain the inverse relationship between farm size and productivity," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 189-194, August.
    20. Johan Swinnen & Alessandro Olper & Senne Vandevelde, 2021. "From unfair prices to unfair trading practices: Political economy, value chains and 21st century agri‐food policy," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(5), pages 771-788, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment
    • C68 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computable General Equilibrium Models

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pre:wpaper:202307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rangan Gupta (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/decupza.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.