IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/99871.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Performance Analysis of Fixed Route Shared Taxi Services (Jitney) - Case Study of Tehran, Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Ataeian, Shervin
  • Mostafavi, Alireza
  • Nabiloo, Roya

Abstract

The fixed route shared taxi, known as Jitney, is one of the common modes in paratransit services and covers a significant proportion of daily trips in some developing countries, including Iran. Such system, despite its disadvantages to transportation networks, has always been the most feasible solution to overcome the shortcoming in public transit supply. As a result, it has formed users’ travel habits over the decades. Therefore, it is not possible to remove or replace Jitney lines with standard services suddenly but gradually. Unfortunately, there is a distinct lack of a comprehensive method to analyze and evaluate Jitney lines neither in the literature nor in practice. In this paper, first, to fill the gap in the literature, we develop a coherent framework to analyze the performance of fixed route shared taxi lines. This framework includes several indices that make it possible to rank and classify Jitney lines from different aspects. Second, to examine the applicability of the proposed framework, we apply it to the network of taxi lines in the metropolis of Tehran. The results prove that the framework is not only applicable in measuring the system performance, but it also provides decision-makers with decision criteria to choose improvement plans or alternatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Ataeian, Shervin & Mostafavi, Alireza & Nabiloo, Roya, 2020. "Performance Analysis of Fixed Route Shared Taxi Services (Jitney) - Case Study of Tehran, Iran," MPRA Paper 99871, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:99871
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/99871/1/MPRA_paper_99871.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pezeshknejad, Parsa & Monajem, Saeed & Mozafari, Hamid, 2020. "Evaluating sustainability and land use integration of BRT stations via extended node place model, an application on BRT stations of Tehran," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    2. Gholami, Ali & Taghizadeh, Yaser & Tian, Zong, 2014. "Classification of taxi khattee (jitney) lines based on topography and line cost indices," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 239-249.
    3. Cristian Domarchi & Juan Enrique Coeymans & Juan de Dios Ortúzar, 2019. "Shared taxis: modelling the choice of a paratransit mode in Santiago de Chile," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 2243-2268, December.
    4. Daniels, Rhonda & Mulley, Corinne, 2013. "Explaining walking distance to public transport: The dominance of public transport supply," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 6(2), pages 5-20.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seltzer, Andrew & Wadsworth, Jonathan, 2021. "The Impact of Public Transportation and Commuting on Urban Labour Markets: Evidence from the New Survey of London Life and Labour, 1929-32," IZA Discussion Papers 14628, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Jaroslav Burian & Lenka Zajíčková & Igor Ivan & Karel Macků, 2018. "Attitudes and Motivation to Use Public or Individual Transport: A Case Study of Two Middle-Sized Cities," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-25, May.
    3. Li, Haojie & Zhang, Yingheng & Zhu, Manman & Ren, Gang, 2021. "Impacts of COVID-19 on the usage of public bicycle share in London," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 140-155.
    4. Muhammad Aamir Basheer & Luuk Boelens & Rob van der Bijl, 2020. "Bus Rapid Transit System: A Study of Sustainable Land-Use Transformation, Urban Density and Economic Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, April.
    5. Vale, David S. & Viana, Cláudia M. & Pereira, Mauro, 2018. "The extended node-place model at the local scale: Evaluating the integration of land use and transport for Lisbon's subway network," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 282-293.
    6. Azad, Mojdeh & Abdelqader, Dua & Taboada, Luis M. & Cherry, Christopher R., 2021. "Walk-to-transit demand estimation methods applied at the parcel level to improve pedestrian infrastructure investment," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    7. Jinjoo Bok & Youngsang Kwon, 2016. "Comparable Measures of Accessibility to Public Transport Using the General Transit Feed Specification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-13, March.
    8. Gao, Jie & Kamphuis, Carlijn B.M. & Helbich, Marco & Ettema, Dick, 2020. "What is ‘neighborhood walkability’? How the built environment differently correlates with walking for different purposes and with walking on weekdays and weekends," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    9. Mulley, Corinne & Tsai, Chi-Hong (Patrick) & Ma, Liang, 2018. "Does residential property price benefit from light rail in Sydney?," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 3-10.
    10. Dorsa Alipour & Hussein Dia, 2023. "A Systematic Review of the Role of Land Use, Transport, and Energy-Environment Integration in Shaping Sustainable Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-29, April.
    11. Ying Liang & Wei Song & Xiaofeng Dong, 2021. "Evaluating the Space Use of Large Railway Hub Station Areas in Beijing toward Integrated Station-City Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, November.
    12. Ouassim Manout & Patrick Bonnel & François Pacull, 2020. "The impact of centroid connectors on transit assignment outcomes," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 611-629, October.
    13. Javad J. C. Aman & Myriam Zakhem & Janille Smith-Colin, 2021. "Towards Equity in Micromobility: Spatial Analysis of Access to Bikes and Scooters amongst Disadvantaged Populations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    14. Hamed Faroqi & Mahmoud Mesbah & Jiwon Kim & Ali Khodaii, 2022. "Targeted Advertising in the Public Transit Network Using Smart Card Data," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 97-124, March.
    15. Tilahun, Nebiyou & Thakuriah, Piyushimita (Vonu) & Li, Moyin & Keita, Yaye, 2016. "Transit use and the work commute: Analyzing the role of last mile issues," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 359-368.
    16. Yang, Hongtai & Huo, Jinghai & Bao, Yongxing & Li, Xuan & Yang, Linchuan & Cherry, Christopher R., 2021. "Impact of e-scooter sharing on bike sharing in Chicago," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 23-36.
    17. Mingzhu Song & Yi Zhang & Meng Li & Yi Zhang, 2021. "Accessibility of Transit Stops with Multiple Feeder Modes: Walking and Private-Bike Cycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-27, March.
    18. Manout, Ouassim & Bonnel, Patrick & Bouzouina, Louafi, 2018. "Transit accessibility: A new definition of transit connectors," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 88-100.
    19. Dong Ha Kim & Seunghyun Yoo, 2019. "How Does the Built Environment in Compact Metropolitan Cities Affect Health? A Systematic Review of Korean Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-22, August.
    20. Pueboobpaphan, Rattaphol & Pueboobpaphan, Suthatip & Sukhotra, Suthasinee, 2022. "Acceptable walking distance to transit stations in Bangkok, Thailand: Application of a stated preference technique," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Fixed Route Shared Taxi; Jitney; Paratransit; Performance Analysis; Performance Index; Decision Criteria.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L91 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Transportation: General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:99871. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.