IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

The Malthus versus Ricardo 1815 Corn Laws Controversy: An appraisal

  • Salvadori, Neri
  • Signorino, Rodolfo

The paper proposes a rational reconstruction of the arguments developed by Malthus and Ricardo in their 1815 essays, Grounds of an Opinion and An Essay on Profits, to repudiate and endorse a policy of free corn trade, respectively. Malthus envisaged defence and opulence as two mutually alternative options and, if required to make a choice, he had no doubt in choosing the former. By contrast, Ricardo excluded any alternative between defence and opulence: trade does note give a sustainable weapon to potential enemies of Great Britain whereas trade-driven opulence may give Great Britain greater means to wage a war.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/50534/1/MPRA_paper_50534.pdf
File Function: original version
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 50534.

as
in new window

Length:
Date of creation: 09 Oct 2013
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:50534
Contact details of provider: Postal: Schackstr. 4, D-80539 Munich, Germany
Phone: +49-(0)89-2180-2219
Fax: +49-(0)89-2180-3900
Web page: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as in new window
  1. Harsanyi, John C., 1995. "A new theory of equilibrium selection for games with complete information," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 91-122.
  2. Roy J. Ruffin, 2002. "David Ricardo's Discovery of Comparative Advantage," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 34(4), pages 727-748, Winter.
  3. Eatwell, John L, 1975. "The Interpretation of Ricardo's Essay on Profits," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 42(166), pages 182-87, May.
  4. Hollander, Samuel, 1983. "Professor Garegnani's Defence of Sraffa on the Material Rate of Profit [On Hollander's Interpretation of Ricardo's Early Theory of Profits]," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 167-74, June.
  5. de Vivo, Giancarlo, 1985. "Robert Torrens and Ricardo's 'Corn-Ratio' Theory of Profits," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 9(1), pages 89-92, March.
  6. Maneschi, Andrea, 1992. "Ricardo's International Trade Theory: Beyond the Comparative Cost Example," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(4), pages 421-37, December.
  7. Garegnani, P, 1982. "On Hollander's Interpretation of Ricardo's Early Theory of Profits," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(1), pages 65-77, March.
  8. Hollander, Samuel, 1992. "Malthus's Abandonment of Agricultural Protectionism: A Discovery in the History of Economic Thought," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 82(3), pages 650-59, June.
  9. Cheryl Schonhardt-Bailey, 2006. "From the Corn Laws to Free Trade: Interests, Ideas, and Institutions in Historical Perspective," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262195437, June.
  10. Maneschi, Andrea, 1983. "Dynamic Aspects of Ricardo's International Trade Theory," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 35(1), pages 67-80, March.
  11. Burgstaller, Andre, 1986. "Unifying Ricardo's Theories of Growth and Comparative Advantage," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 53(212), pages 467-81, November.
  12. Findlay, Ronald, 1974. "Relative Prices, Growth and Trade in a Simple Ricardian System," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 41(161), pages 1-13, February.
  13. Peach, Terry, 1984. "David Ricardo's Early Treatment of Profitability: A New Interpretation," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 94(376), pages 733-51, December.
  14. Samuel Hollander, 1977. "Ricardo and the Corn Laws: A Revision," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 9(1), pages 1-47, Spring.
  15. Samuel Hollander, 1995. "More on Malthus and Agricultural Protection," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 27(3), pages 531-537, Fall.
  16. O'Brien, D P, 1981. "Ricardian Economics and the Economics of David Ricardo," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 33(3), pages 352-86, November.
  17. J. M. Pullen, 1995. "Malthus on Agricultural Protection: An Alternative View," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 27(3), pages 517-529, Fall.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:50534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ekkehart Schlicht)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.