IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v16y1992i4p421-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ricardo's International Trade Theory: Beyond the Comparative Cost Example

Author

Listed:
  • Maneschi, Andrea

Abstract

The benefits of trade for David Ricardo should be related to his rent theory and are dynamic in nature, outweighing the static ones associated with the theory advantage. In light of several recen t multifactor "Ricardian" models, a reevaluation of Ricardo's trade theory is called for. Its textbook version postulates that commoditi es are produced by labor alone at constant cost. This static model is n ot representative of the implicit trade model underlying chapter 7 and other chapters of the Principles in which trade figures prominently, and Ricardo's other writings, and should be replaced by a richer, multifactor model. Copyright 1992 by Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Maneschi, Andrea, 1992. "Ricardo's International Trade Theory: Beyond the Comparative Cost Example," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(4), pages 421-437, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:16:y:1992:i:4:p:421-37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jin Suk Park & Eunju Hwang, 2023. "Sectoral FTA gains, conflicts, and the role of interindustry factor mobility: Evidence from Korea's free trade agreement," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 97-123, February.
    2. Andrea Maneschi, 2008. "How Would David Ricardo Have Taught the Principle of Comparative Advantage?," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 74(4), pages 1167-1176, April.
    3. Cláudio Gontijo, 2000. "The Ricardian theory of international trade: a criticism," Textos para Discussão Cedeplar-UFMG td141, Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
    4. John E. King, 2013. "Ricardo on Trade," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 32(4), pages 462-469, December.
    5. Robert A. Blecker, 2015. "International Trade and Development," Working Papers 2015-07, American University, Department of Economics.
    6. Salvadori, Neri & Signorino, Rodolfo, 2013. "The Malthus versus Ricardo 1815 Corn Laws Controversy: An appraisal," MPRA Paper 50534, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Tamás Mizik, 2021. "Agri-Food Trade Competitiveness: A Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    8. Ajmani, Manmeet, 2023. "Examining the interplay between agri-food and trade competitiveness: A review of literature," MPRA Paper 118396, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Maneschi, Andrea, 2004. "The true meaning of David Ricardo's four magic numbers," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 433-443, March.
    10. Deborah Winkler & William Milberg, 2011. "Classical and Neoclassical Theories of Offshore Outsourcing," Working Papers 1113, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics.
    11. Dr. Caroline Ntara, 2022. "What Does Africa Stand to Gain from the African Continental Free Trade Area?," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 16(1), pages 69-90.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:16:y:1992:i:4:p:421-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.