IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aif/journl/v16y2022i1p69-90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Does Africa Stand to Gain from the African Continental Free Trade Area?

Author

Listed:
  • Dr. Caroline Ntara

    (Monarch Business School, Switzerland.)

Abstract

There is a notion that Africa has been getting the “short end of the stick†when it comes to bilateral trade agreements with the rest of the world. With the newly formed African Continental Free Trade Area - AfCFTA - that aims to enhance Africa’s trade links with the rest of the world, the question remains whether this initiative will benefit the African countries. The paper uses theories of international trade, regional integration and economic growth to recommend how the AfCFTA can succeed for the benefit of the African continent. The paper analyses the current trade situation within Africa and compares it with the continents’ trade with the rest of the world using mixed methods research design. The study uses secondary data from Trade Map from 2017-2021 and compares the performance of selected trading blocs on the continent. Qualitative data were collected through Delphi techniques with experts from across the African continent. Data on individual trading blocs suggests that despite the continent’s trade deficit position, some regional blocs have a trade surplus. The study identifies challenges facing Africa’s trade, proposes solutions to improve intra-regional trade and gives policy directions to guide the successful implementation of the AfCFTA.

Suggested Citation

  • Dr. Caroline Ntara, 2022. "What Does Africa Stand to Gain from the African Continental Free Trade Area?," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 16(1), pages 69-90.
  • Handle: RePEc:aif:journl:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:69-90
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijsab.com/wp-content/uploads/975.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ijsab.com/volume-16-issue-1/5098
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrei A. Levchenko & Jing Zhang, 2012. "Comparative advantage and the welfare impact of European integration [General equilibrium analysis of the Eaton–Kortum model of international trade]," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 27(72), pages 567-602.
    2. repec:oup:ecpoli:v:27:y:2012:i:72:p:567-602 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Christian Ketels, 2006. "Michael Porter’s Competitiveness Framework—Recent Learnings and New Research Priorities," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 115-136, June.
    4. Rauch, James E, 1991. "Comparative Advantage, Geographic Advantage and the Volume of Trade," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 101(408), pages 1230-1244, September.
    5. Redding, Stephen, 1999. "Dynamic Comparative Advantage and the Welfare Effects of Trade," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 51(1), pages 15-39, January.
    6. Dion, David-Pascal, 2004. "Regional integration and economic development: An empirical approach," Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems 21, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich.
    7. Kazunobu Hayakawa & Fukunari Kimura, 2015. "How Much Do Free Trade Agreements Reduce Impediments to Trade?," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 711-729, September.
    8. Ethier, Wilfred J, 1998. "The New Regionalism," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 108(449), pages 1149-1161, July.
    9. John McLaren, 2002. "A Theory of Insidious Regionalism," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 117(2), pages 571-608.
    10. Maneschi, Andrea, 1992. "Ricardo's International Trade Theory: Beyond the Comparative Cost Example," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(4), pages 421-437, December.
    11. Mareike Kleine & Mark Pollack, 2018. "Liberal Intergovernmentalism and Its Critics," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(7), pages 1493-1509, November.
    12. Campa, Jose Manuel & Sorenson, Timothy L, 1996. " Are Trade Blocs Conducive to Free Trade?," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 98(2), pages 263-273, June.
    13. Dion, David-Pascal, 2004. "Regional integration and economic development: A theoretical approach," Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems 20, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich.
    14. Maurice Schiff & L. Alan Winters, 2003. "Regional Integration and Development," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 15172, December.
    15. World Bank, 2020. "The African Continental Free Trade Area," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 34139, December.
    16. Andrew Moravcsik, 1995. "Liberal Intergovernmentalism and Integration: A Rejoinder," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 611-628, December.
    17. John Kagochi & Nazif Durmaz, 2018. "Assessing RTAs inter-regional trade enhancement in Sub-Saharan Africa," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1482662-148, January.
    18. Ilkhom SHARIPOV, 2015. "Contemporary Economic Growth Models And Theories: A Literature Review," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 7(3), pages 759-773, September.
    19. Sunanda Sen, 2010. "International Trade Theory and Policy: A Review of the Literature," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_635, Levy Economics Institute.
    20. Francis Ejones & Frank W. Agbola & Amir Mahmood, 2021. "Regional Integration and Economic Growth: New Empirical Evidence from the East African Community," The International Trade Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 311-335, July.
    21. Ganeshan Wignaraja & Adam Collins & Pabasara Kannangara, 2019. "Opportunities and Challenges for Regional Economic Integration in the Indian Ocean," Journal of Asian Economic Integration, , vol. 1(1), pages 129-151, April.
    22. Kuteesa, Annette, 2012. "East African Regional Integration: Challenges in meeting the convergence criteria for monetary union," Research Series 148956, Economic Policy Research Centre (EPRC).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nuno Limão, 2016. "Preferential Trade Agreements," NBER Working Papers 22138, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Hiro Lee & Dominique van der Mensbrugghe, 2007. "Regional Integration, Sectoral Adjustments and Natural Groupings in East Asia," OSIPP Discussion Paper 07E008, Osaka School of International Public Policy, Osaka University.
    3. Richard E. Baldwin, 2011. "Multilateralising Regionalism: Spaghetti Bowls as Building Blocks on the Path to Global Free Trade," Chapters, in: Miroslav N. Jovanović (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, Volume I, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Leonardo Baccini, 2010. "Explaining formation and design of EU trade agreements: The role of transparency and flexibility," European Union Politics, , vol. 11(2), pages 195-217, June.
    5. Bagwell,K. & Staiger,R.W., 2000. "GATT-think," Working papers 19, Wisconsin Madison - Social Systems.
    6. Burfisher, Mary E. & Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 2004. "Regionalism," MTID discussion papers 65, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    7. Bouzas, Roberto, 2005. "The new regionalism" and the Free Trade Area of the Americas: a less benevolent view"," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), April.
    8. Baccini, Leonardo, 2010. "Explaining formation and design of EU trade agreements: the role of transparency and flexibility," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 45565, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Emanuel Ornelas, 2007. "Exchanging market access at the outsiders' expense: the case of customs unions," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(1), pages 207-224, February.
    10. Richard Baldwin, 2008. "Big-Think Regionalism: A Critical Survey," NBER Working Papers 14056, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Irena Benešová & Luboš Smutka & Lenka Rumánková & Adriana Laputková & Zuzana Novotná, 2016. "Regional Cooperation of the Post-Soviet Countries - Can it Be Influenced by the Structure of the Economy?," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 64(6), pages 1843-1856.
    12. Bertha Nyarire Makilagi & Jinhwan Oh, 2023. "What determines Tanzania's trade? A gravity approach," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 26(4), pages 438-448, December.
    13. Aidara, Khadidiatou & Fall, Founty A. & Seck, Abdoulaye, 2019. "Is Africa an Economic Space?," Conference papers 333021, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    14. Islam, Sulequl, 2003. "Expansions of the European Union and the NAFTA: Implications for New and Non-Member countries," Applied Econometrics and International Development, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 3(2).
    15. Jacob Wood & Gohar Feroz Khan, 2015. "International trade negotiation analysis: network and semantic knowledge infrastructure," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(1), pages 537-556, October.
    16. Till F. Hollstein & Kristian Estévez, 2017. "Industrial Policy and the Timing of Trade Liberalization," UB School of Economics Working Papers 2017/361, University of Barcelona School of Economics.
    17. Siebert, Horst, 2005. "TAFTA - a dead horse or an attractive open club?," Kiel Working Papers 1240, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    18. Beňo, Michal, 2021. "E-working: Country Versus Culture Dimension," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 13(2), June.
    19. Kym Anderson, 2005. "On the Virtues of Multilateral Trade Negotiations," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 81(255), pages 414-438, December.
    20. André de Waal, 2011. "Strategy Only Matters A Bit: The role of Strategy in the High Performance Organization," Working Papers 2011/02, Maastricht School of Management.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aif:journl:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:69-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Farjana Rahman (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.