IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ecpoli/v27y2012i72p567-602..html

Comparative advantage and the welfare impact of European integration
[General equilibrium analysis of the Eaton–Kortum model of international trade]

Author

Listed:
  • Andrei A. Levchenko
  • Jing Zhang

Abstract

This paper investigates the welfare gains from European trade integration, and the role of comparative advantage in determining the magnitude of those gains. We use a multi-sector Ricardian model implemented on 79 countries, and compare welfare in the 2000s to a counterfactual scenario in which East European countries are closed to trade. For West European countries, the mean welfare gain from trade integration with Eastern Europe is 0.16%, ranging from zero for Portugal to 0.4% for Austria. For East European countries, gains from trade are 9.23% at the mean, ranging from 2.85% for Russia to 20% for Estonia. For Eastern Europe, comparative advantage is a key determinant of the variation in the welfare gains: countries whose comparative advantage is most similar to Western Europe tend to gain less, while countries with technology most different from Western Europe gain the most.— Andrei A. Levchenko and Jing Zhang

Suggested Citation

  • Andrei A. Levchenko & Jing Zhang, 2012. "Comparative advantage and the welfare impact of European integration [General equilibrium analysis of the Eaton–Kortum model of international trade]," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 27(72), pages 567-602.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ecpoli:v:27:y:2012:i:72:p:567-602.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1468-0327.2012.00294.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elizaveta Archanskaia, 2013. "Proximity as a Source of Comparative Advantage," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-01070440, HAL.
    2. Javier Barbero & Giovanni Mandras & Ernesto Rodríguez-Crespo & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2021. "Quality of government and regional trade: evidence from European Union regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(7), pages 1240-1251, July.
    3. d'Artis, Kancs & Persyn, Damiaan, 2010. "Variety Gains from Trade Integration in Europe," Conference papers 332032, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    4. Los, Bart & Timmer, Marcel P. & de Vries, Gaaitzen J., 2015. "How important are exports for job growth in China? A demand side analysis," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 19-32.
    5. Han, Yuancheng & Miranda-Pinto, Jorge & Tanaka, Satoshi, 2025. "Service Trade, regional specialization, and welfare," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    6. Morrow, Peter M. & Trefler, Daniel, 2022. "How do endowments determine trade? quantifying the output mix, factor price, and skill-biased technology channels," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    7. Giovanni Peri & Francesc Ortega, 2012. "The Effect of Trade and Migration on Income," Working Papers 115, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics.
    8. Elizaveta Archanskaia, 2013. "Proximity as a Source of Comparative Advantage," Sciences Po Economics Discussion Papers hal-01070440, HAL.
    9. Michele Imbruno, 2021. "A micro‐founded approach to exploring gains from trade integration: Evidence from 27 EU countries," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 706-732, March.
    10. Marcel Henkel & Tobias Seidel, 2019. "A Spatial Perspective On European Integration: Heterogeneous Welfare And Migration Effects From The Single Market And The Brexit," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 57(1), pages 333-352, January.
    11. Francesc Ortega & Giovanni Peri, 2016. "Openness and income: The roles of trade and migration," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: The Economics of International Migration, chapter 10, pages 309-329, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    12. Peter Egger & Sergey K. Nigai, 2016. "World-Trade Growth Accounting," CESifo Working Paper Series 5831, CESifo.
    13. Fritz Breuss, 2020. "25 Years of Austria's EU Membership. Quantifying the Economic Benefits With a DSGE Model," WIFO Working Papers 603, WIFO.
    14. Bouët, Antoine & Estrades, Carmen & Laborde, David, 2011. "Households heterogeneity in a global CGE model: an illustration with the MIRAGE poverty module," Conference papers 332034, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    15. Robin Grözinger, 2020. "Decomposing Central and Eastern Europe’s trade: Extending the evidence," Working Papers 389, Leibniz Institut für Ost- und Südosteuropaforschung (Leibniz Institute for East and Southeast European Studies).
    16. Elizaveta Archanskaia, 2013. "Proximity as a Source of Comparative Advantage," Working Papers hal-01070440, HAL.
    17. Levchenko, Andrei A. & Zhang, Jing, 2014. "Ricardian productivity differences and the gains from trade," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 45-65.
    18. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/dambferfb7dfprc9m054kce41 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Luigi Bonatti & Andrea Fracasso, 2013. "The German Model and the European Crisis," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(6), pages 1023-1039, November.
    20. Fritz Breuss, 2020. "Makroökonomische Effekte der 25- jährigen EU-Mitgliedschaft Österreichs," Monetary Policy & the Economy, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue Q1-Q2/20, pages 27-48.
    21. Badi H. Baltagi & Peter Egger & Michael Pfaffermayr, 2014. "Panel Data Gravity Models of International Trade," CESifo Working Paper Series 4616, CESifo.
    22. Dr. Caroline Ntara, 2022. "What Does Africa Stand to Gain from the African Continental Free Trade Area?," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 16(1), pages 69-90.
    23. Nuno Limão, 2016. "Preferential Trade Agreements," NBER Working Papers 22138, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    24. Ortega, Francesc & Peri, Giovanni, 2013. "Migration, Trade and Income," IZA Discussion Papers 7325, IZA Network @ LISER.
    25. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/dambferfb7dfprc9m054kce41 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F11 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Neoclassical Models of Trade
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ecpoli:v:27:y:2012:i:72:p:567-602.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cebruuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.