Sull'inseparabilità delle strutture sintattiche nell'analisi classica del valore e della distribuzione
The paper deals with a fundamental issue in the history of economic thought: the alleged separability in the classical analysis of distinct and sequential logical stages. It will be recalled that the contested idea of an analytical separation of the theory of value (relative prices), the theory of production (relative quantities) and the theory of the social distribution of income was initially advanced by Ricardo, in his lost Papers on the Profits of Capital and in his Essay on Profits, but later abandoned, in the third edition of the Principles. It was then reproposed by J.S. Mill, Jevons, Sraffa and Garegnani, and opposed by Malthus, Marshall and Walras. Today a separability thesis cannot be maintained, as it presupposes the existence of a given physical vector of the real wage, a circumstance which is not satisfied in the present world.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): LXIV (2009)
Issue (Month): 97 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.asp?IDRivista=59|
|Order Information:|| Web: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Elenco_Prodotti.aspx?startCode=DC Email: |
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Samuelson, Paul A, 1978. "The Canonical Classical Model of Political Economy," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 16(4), pages 1415-34, December.
- Peach,Terry, 1993. "Interpreting Ricardo," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521260862, December.
- Garegnani, P, 1982. "On Hollander's Interpretation of Ricardo's Early Theory of Profits," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(1), pages 65-77, March.
- Cavalieri, Duccio, 2001. "On Some Controversial Aspects of Sraffa's Theoretical System in the Second Half of the 1920s," MPRA Paper 43737, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- P. Garegnani, 1970. "A Reply," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 37(3), pages 439.
- Mark Blaug, 1999.
"Misunderstanding Classical Economics: The Sraffian Interpretation of the Surplus Approach,"
History of Political Economy,
Duke University Press, vol. 31(2), pages 213-236, Summer.
- Blaug, M., 1998. "Misunderstanding Classical Economics - The Sraffian Interpretation of the Surplus Approach," Discussion Papers 9802, Exeter University, Department of Economics.
- Pier Luigi Porta, 1986. "Understanding the Significance of Piero Sraffa's Standard Commodity: A Rejoinder," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 18(3), pages 479-484, Fall.
- Alessandro Roncaglia & Samuel Hollander, 1982. "Hollander's Ricardo [with Reply] [with Rejoinder]," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, M.E. Sharpe, Inc., vol. 4(3), pages 339-375, April.
- Pier Luigi Porta, 1986. "Understanding the Significance of Piero Sraffa's Standard Commodity: A Note on the Marxian Notion of Surplus," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 18(3), pages 443-454, Fall.
- P. Garegnani, 1970. "Heterogeneous Capital, the Production Function and the Theory of Distribution," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 37(3), pages 407-436.
- Pierangelo Garegnani, 2002. "Misunderstanding Classical Economics? A Reply to Blaug," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 34(1), pages 241-254, Spring.
- Cavalieri Duccio, 2001. "Sul sistema teorico del giovane Sraffa," Economia politica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 19-40.
- Samuel Hollander, 2000. "Sraffa and the Interpretation of Ricardo: The Marxian Dimension," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 32(2), pages 187-232, Summer.
- Peach, Terry, 2001. "Hollander, de Vivo and the 'Further Evidence' for the Corn Model Interpretation of Ricardo: A Conspiracy of Silence?," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 25(5), pages 685-92, September.
- Cavalieri, Duccio, 1991.
"Marshall, l'economia classica e la logica della separazione
[Marshall, classical political economy and the logic of separation]," MPRA Paper 44167, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Hahn, Frank, 1982. "The Neo-Ricardians," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(4), pages 353-74, December.
- Peach, Terry, 1988. "Samuel Hollander's Classical Economics: A Review Article," The Manchester School of Economic & Social Studies, University of Manchester, vol. 56(2), pages 167-76, June.
- Terry Peach, 2002. "Interpreting Ricardo: a further reply to Sraffians," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 26(3), pages 381-391, May.
- Pierangelo Garegnani, 1998. "Sraffa: the theoretical world of the 'old classical economists'," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 415-429.
- Peach, Terry, 1984. "David Ricardo's Early Treatment of Profitability: A New Interpretation," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 94(376), pages 733-51, December.
- Hollander, Jacob H., 1904. "The Development of Ricardo's Theory of Value," History of Economic Thought Articles, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, vol. 18, pages 455-491.
- Casarosa, Carlo, 1978. "A New Formulation of the Ricardian System," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(1), pages 38-63, March.
- John Hicks & Samuel Hollander, 1977. "Mr. Ricardo and the Moderns," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 91(3), pages 351-369.
- Peach, Terry, 1998. "On Interpreting Ricardo: A Reply to Sraffians," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 22(5), pages 597-616, September.
- Arrow, Kenneth J., 1991. "Ricardo's Work as Viewed by Later Economists," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(01), pages 70-77, June.
- Christian Gehrke & Heinz D. Kurz, 2006. "Sraffa on von Bortkiewicz: Reconstructing the Classical Theory of Value and Distribution," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 38(1), pages 91-149, Spring.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:steste:v:html10.3280/ste2009-097001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Angelo Ventriglia)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.