IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Perspectives on Unemployment from a General Equilibrium Search Model

Listed author(s):
  • Harding, Don
  • Kam, Timothy

Australia has experienced a varied track record on unemployment. For the third quarter of the 20th century unemployment averaged 2.0 per cent. This is bracketed by average unemployment rates of 8.6 and 7.4 per cent in the second and fourth quarter centuries. Explanations of this phenomenon vary. In this paper we explore supply side explanations using a model developed by Ljungqvist and Sargent (LS). We adapt the LS model to the Australian tax and welfare system and calibrate it to the Australian economy. Two simulation experiments are considered. In the first we study the effect of varying the unemployment benefit on the level and composition of unemployment. In the second simulation we examine the effects of increasing the degree of turbulence experienced by the economy. In the former simulation we find that: raising benefits causes a rise in the duration of unemployment; unemployment rates rise; across voluntary and involuntary unemployment classes; the rise is relatively larger in the range of low skill workers whose job-search intensity falls the greatest. Job-search intensity of voluntarily unemployed workers does not change with benefits; and reservation wages of individuals with high skill levels are unaffected by unemployment benefits but the reservation wage low skilled workers increases with the unemployment benefit. In the second simulation increasing turbulence in the economic environment causes an increase in total unemployment and in involuntary unemployment. However, voluntary unemployment falls, because people alter their reservation wages and search intensities in response to increased turbulence; overall the average duration of unemployment rises. Finally, we replicate the LS finding that the adverse consequences of increased turbulence are larger in economies with more generous welfare systems. We interpret the findings reported above as suggesting that the LS model is a useful tool of analysis and in the final version of the paper we propose to calibrate the model to the changes in the level of unemployment benefits and the progressivity of the income tax schedule that occurred towards the end of the third quarter of the 20th century. Our objectives will be to quantify how much of the change in unemployment can be attributed to these factors and to quantify the extent to which higher unemployment is attributable to increased turbulence.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: original version
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 3696.

in new window

Date of creation: 09 Aug 2001
Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:3696
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Ludwigstra├če 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany

Phone: +49-(0)89-2180-2459
Fax: +49-(0)89-2180-992459
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Lars Ljungqvist & Thomas J. Sargent, 1998. "The European Unemployment Dilemma," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 106(3), pages 514-550, June.
  2. Samuel Bentolila & Giuseppe Bertola, 1990. "Firing Costs and Labour Demand: How Bad is Eurosclerosis?," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 57(3), pages 381-402.
  3. Olivier J. Blanchard & Lawrence H. Summers, 1986. "Hysteresis and the European Unemployment Problem," NBER Chapters,in: NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1986, Volume 1, pages 15-90 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  4. Peter Gottschalk & Robert Moffitt, 1994. "The Growth of Earnings Instability in the U.S. Labor Market," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 25(2), pages 217-272.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:3696. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joachim Winter)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.