Author
Abstract
Heterogeneous-agent macroeconomics has reformed the income and wealth sides of the household problem. The HANK program established that aggregate dynamics require the cross-sectional distribution of marginal propensities to consume, balance-sheet exposures, and permanent income. Every model in this program inherits, without examination, a smooth actuarial mortality hazard calibrated to population life tables. This is the last unreformed input, and it is structurally wrong. The expected residual life of an agent is a value function defined on a manifold whose boundary is death. That function has a geometric property rarely stated in the economic literature: its curvature diverges at a specific power law rate as the agent approaches the boundary. Every lifecycle model that represents mortality as a smooth hazard imposes a bounded-curvature approximation on a function whose curvature is unbounded. No function in the smooth hazard class can encode the shock structure of catastrophic diagnoses that dominate individual mortality trajectories near the boundary, regardless of how many parameters the hazard contains. We establish three structural consequences. First, the population-level response to symmetric interventions is asymmetric: the worsening direction systematically exceeds the improving direction by a factor governed by a single cross-sectional moment, the covariance between boundary curvature and intervention exposure. Second, this covariance is not a small correction in clinical settings: unlike the borrowing-constraint analog in macroeconomics, where the boundary binds for a minority of agents, the mortality boundary is universal, and the population-level curvature integral diverges in a way the macroeconomic scaling intuition cannot accommodate. Third, the representation class that correctly encodes the boundary geometry exists: trained networks with piecewise-linear activation produce value functions that are exactly tropical polynomials in the max-plus semiring, with the density of the piecewise structure near the boundary encoding the curvature divergence that smooth functions cannot. A constellation of puzzles that the lifecycle literature has documented and not resolved, covering wealth decumulation, bequest dispersion, annuitization, retirement timing, portfolio composition, health expenditure at end of life, long-term care insurance, Social Security claiming, and pension tax choices. These are projections of a single geometric fact. Correcting the mortality input generates each of them as equilibrium properties of the model rather than as calibrated parameters or behavioral anomalies.
Suggested Citation
Zhorin, Victor, 2026.
"The Mortality Input Problem: Trajectory-Dependent Death and the Lifecycle Model,"
MPRA Paper
129315, University Library of Munich, Germany.
Handle:
RePEc:pra:mprapa:129315
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
- E21 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Consumption; Saving; Wealth
- G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
- G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies
- H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions
- I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:129315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.