IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/127361.html

AI as Public Infrastructure: A Critical Review of the Transition from Tool to Societal Necessity

Author

Listed:
  • İbrahimov, Oktay

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has ceased to be a collection of discrete tools. It is now a general-purpose cognitive infrastructure—an expanding layer that mediates learning, resource allocation, decision-making, and power across economies and polities. From finance and healthcare to education, defense, and public administration, AI systems increasingly shape both productivity and the legitimacy of institutions themselves. This paper conceptualizes AI as Public Infrastructure (AIPI)—a governance framework for managing the interface between globally produced AI systems and domestic institutions. AIPI operates as a filter-translation membrane, channeling the inflow of capabilities through cultural, legal, ethical, economic, and contractual layers before embedding them in critical national workflows. Drawing on real-world governance practice, we identify three dominant styles—market-led, state-led, and hybrid—defined by how authority, accountability, and coordination are distributed across public and private actors. Using country cases, we show the conditions under which AI capabilities cross into public-infrastructure status and thus warrant infrastructure-grade obligations. For small and mid-tier states, the realistic strategic aim is governed dependence—the deliberate alignment of imported frontier systems with national priorities and assurance capacity—rather than unattainable autonomy. To operationalize this perspective, we introduce the Infrastructure Status Index (ISI) as a jurisdiction- and domain-specific metric. ISI scores a given country × sector on four dimensions—Essentiality, Embeddedness, Legitimacy, Governance—to answer two questions: (1) has the national capability crossed public-infrastructure thresholds? (2) where does governance lag adoption? Taken together, the AIPI–ISI frameworks form a national/sectoral design and oversight architecture: they translate diagnosis into clear obligations and pathways for implementation, so imported AI can be embedded purposefully and accountably.

Suggested Citation

  • İbrahimov, Oktay, 2025. "AI as Public Infrastructure: A Critical Review of the Transition from Tool to Societal Necessity," MPRA Paper 127361, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:127361
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/127361/1/MPRA_paper_127361.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susan Leigh Star & Karen Ruhleder, 1996. "Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 111-134, March.
    2. Pratyusha Kalluri, 2020. "Don’t ask if artificial intelligence is good or fair, ask how it shifts power," Nature, Nature, vol. 583(7815), pages 169-169, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Tilson & Kalle Lyytinen & Carsten Sørensen, 2010. "Research Commentary ---Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 748-759, December.
    2. Chimenti, Gianluca & Hagberg, Johan & Araujo, Luis, 2025. "Platforms, infrastructures and the Futures of market society," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    3. Emmanuelle Vaast & Geoff Walsham, 2009. "Trans-Situated Learning: Supporting a Network of Practice with an Information Infrastructure," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 547-564, December.
    4. Pradeep Racherla & Munir Mandviwalla, 2013. "Moving from Access to Use of the Information Infrastructure: A Multilevel Sociotechnical Framework," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 709-730, September.
    5. Cass, Noel & Schwanen, Tim & Shove, Elizabeth, 2018. "Infrastructures, intersections and societal transformations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 160-167.
    6. Cumbo, Bronwyn, 2026. "Opportunities for Participatory Design in Shaping Australia’s Data Centre Futures," SocArXiv nzu6e_v1, Center for Open Science.
    7. Johnathan Goeiman, 2026. "Embodied infrastructures and the spatial imagination of mobilities: ‘Following’ street waste-picker bodies within and among critical urban waste networks of Johannesburg," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 63(2), pages 337-354, February.
    8. Malcolm Wolski & Joanna Richardson, 2014. "A Model for Institutional Infrastructure to Support Digital Scholarship," Publications, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-17, September.
    9. Young, Meg & Katell, Michael & Krafft, P. M., 2019. "Municipal Surveillance Regulation and Algorithmic Accountability," SocArXiv zx2sw, Center for Open Science.
    10. Scott, Susan V. & Zachariadis, Markos, 2012. "Origins and development of SWIFT, 1973–2009," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 46490, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Dietmar Offenhuber, 2019. "The platform and the bricoleur—Improvisation and smart city initiatives in Indonesia," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(8), pages 1565-1580, October.
    12. Ibrahimov, Oktay, 2025. "Making intelligence public: Thresholds of policy, demand, and AI-readiness," MPRA Paper 127366, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Rebecca Vine, 2020. "Riskwork in the construction of Heathrow Terminal 2," SPRU Working Paper Series 2020-20, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    14. Pflueger, Dane & Palermo, Tommaso & Martinez, Daniel, 2019. "Thinking infrastructure and the organization of markets: the creation of a legal market for cannabis in Colorado," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 91412, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Innis, Phillip Garjay & Van Assche, Kristof & Müller-Mahn, Detlef, 2024. "Searching for stable electricity in Monrovia: Co-evolution of energy infrastructure and practices," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    16. Lara Roeven & Steven A. Wolf & Phoebe Sengers & Jen Liu & Gloire Rubambiza & Donny Persaud & Hakim Weatherspoon, 2025. "Analyzing abstraction in critical agri-food studies and computer science: toward interdisciplinary analysis of digital agriculture innovation," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(2), pages 1009-1026, June.
    17. Aula, Ville, 2019. "Institutions, infrastructures, and data friction – reforming secondary use of health data in Finland," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101454, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Montañés, Cristina Crespo & Ray, Isha & Jacome, Veronica, 2025. "Out of sight, out of mind? How electricity (un)reliability shapes residential energy transitions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 385(C).
    19. Cagdas Dedeoglu & Cansu Ekmekcioglu, 2020. "Information Infrastructures and the Future of Ecological Citizenship in the Anthropocene," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, January.
    20. Hyysalo, Sampsa & Usenyuk, Svetlana, 2015. "The user dominated technology era: Dynamics of dispersed peer-innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 560-576.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:127361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.