IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jpubli/v2y2014i4p83-99d40690.html

A Model for Institutional Infrastructure to Support Digital Scholarship

Author

Listed:
  • Malcolm Wolski

    (Division of Information Services, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia)

  • Joanna Richardson

    (Division of Information Services, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia)

Abstract

There is a driving imperative for new knowledge, approaches and technologies to empower scholarship, especially in emerging areas of inquiry. Sources of information now extend beyond the written word to include a wide range of born-digital objects. This paper examines the changing landscape in which digital scholars find, collaborate, create and process information and, as a result, scholarship is being transformed. It discusses the key elements required to build an institutional infrastructure, which will not only support new practices but also integrate scholarly literature into emerging and evolving models that generate true digital scholarship. The paper outlines some of the major impediments in implementing such a model, as well as suggestions on how to overcome these barriers.

Suggested Citation

  • Malcolm Wolski & Joanna Richardson, 2014. "A Model for Institutional Infrastructure to Support Digital Scholarship," Publications, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:2:y:2014:i:4:p:83-99:d:40690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/2/4/83/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/2/4/83/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gigi Georges & Stephen Goldsmith, 2010. "Leading Social Innovation," Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, MIT Press, vol. 5(2), pages 13-21, April.
    2. Susan Leigh Star & Karen Ruhleder, 1996. "Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 111-134, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Tilson & Kalle Lyytinen & Carsten Sørensen, 2010. "Research Commentary ---Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 748-759, December.
    2. Chimenti, Gianluca & Hagberg, Johan & Araujo, Luis, 2025. "Platforms, infrastructures and the Futures of market society," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    3. Emmanuelle Vaast & Geoff Walsham, 2009. "Trans-Situated Learning: Supporting a Network of Practice with an Information Infrastructure," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 547-564, December.
    4. Pradeep Racherla & Munir Mandviwalla, 2013. "Moving from Access to Use of the Information Infrastructure: A Multilevel Sociotechnical Framework," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 709-730, September.
    5. Cass, Noel & Schwanen, Tim & Shove, Elizabeth, 2018. "Infrastructures, intersections and societal transformations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 160-167.
    6. Cumbo, Bronwyn, 2026. "Opportunities for Participatory Design in Shaping Australia’s Data Centre Futures," SocArXiv nzu6e_v1, Center for Open Science.
    7. Johnathan Goeiman, 2026. "Embodied infrastructures and the spatial imagination of mobilities: ‘Following’ street waste-picker bodies within and among critical urban waste networks of Johannesburg," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 63(2), pages 337-354, February.
    8. Young, Meg & Katell, Michael & Krafft, P. M., 2019. "Municipal Surveillance Regulation and Algorithmic Accountability," SocArXiv zx2sw, Center for Open Science.
    9. Scott, Susan V. & Zachariadis, Markos, 2012. "Origins and development of SWIFT, 1973–2009," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 46490, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Dietmar Offenhuber, 2019. "The platform and the bricoleur—Improvisation and smart city initiatives in Indonesia," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(8), pages 1565-1580, October.
    11. Ibrahimov, Oktay, 2025. "Making intelligence public: Thresholds of policy, demand, and AI-readiness," MPRA Paper 127366, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Rebecca Vine, 2020. "Riskwork in the construction of Heathrow Terminal 2," SPRU Working Paper Series 2020-20, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    13. Pflueger, Dane & Palermo, Tommaso & Martinez, Daniel, 2019. "Thinking infrastructure and the organization of markets: the creation of a legal market for cannabis in Colorado," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 91412, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Innis, Phillip Garjay & Van Assche, Kristof & Müller-Mahn, Detlef, 2024. "Searching for stable electricity in Monrovia: Co-evolution of energy infrastructure and practices," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    15. Lara Roeven & Steven A. Wolf & Phoebe Sengers & Jen Liu & Gloire Rubambiza & Donny Persaud & Hakim Weatherspoon, 2025. "Analyzing abstraction in critical agri-food studies and computer science: toward interdisciplinary analysis of digital agriculture innovation," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(2), pages 1009-1026, June.
    16. Aula, Ville, 2019. "Institutions, infrastructures, and data friction – reforming secondary use of health data in Finland," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101454, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Montañés, Cristina Crespo & Ray, Isha & Jacome, Veronica, 2025. "Out of sight, out of mind? How electricity (un)reliability shapes residential energy transitions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 385(C).
    18. Cagdas Dedeoglu & Cansu Ekmekcioglu, 2020. "Information Infrastructures and the Future of Ecological Citizenship in the Anthropocene," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, January.
    19. Hyysalo, Sampsa & Usenyuk, Svetlana, 2015. "The user dominated technology era: Dynamics of dispersed peer-innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 560-576.
    20. Boyer O’Leary, Michael & Wilson, Jeanne M. & Metiu, Anca, 2011. "Beyond Being There: The Symbolic Role of Communication and Identification in the Emergence of Perceived Proximity in Geographically Dispersed Work," ESSEC Working Papers WP1112, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:2:y:2014:i:4:p:83-99:d:40690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.