IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/wpjbz.html

United but Divided. The Segmented Rally in a Polarized Society in Wartime

Author

Listed:
  • Feinstein, Yuval
  • David, Geffen Ben

Abstract

Interest in the rally-round-the-flag phenomenon of public opinion has increased in studies on reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war. In the same period, a separate research line has focused on political polarization and the strengthening of radical right parties in many countries. This study brings these two lines together by asking how public opinion in deeply polarized countries responds to violent international conflicts, which, under lesser polarization, would have likely led most citizens to close ranks behind the government and its war policy. To answer this question, we analyzed original panel data collected in Israel before and after the October 7 massacre and during Israel’s retaliation in Gaza. The findings reveal mixed patterns that we label “segmented rally:” The vast majority supported the war and trusted the security forces, but only a minority trusted the government and the prime minister. The analysis identified distinct sets of mechanisms of opinion formation. Rallying behind the war and security forces was motivated by feelings of threat, humiliation, and rage. In contrast, trust or mistrust of the government and the PM depended on whether respondents blamed the government or anti-government protests for the security crisis, an assessment driven by respondents’ preexisting views about the government’s “judicial reform” initiative. The paper concludes by discussing the mutual impacts of polarization and public reactions to crises.

Suggested Citation

  • Feinstein, Yuval & David, Geffen Ben, 2024. "United but Divided. The Segmented Rally in a Polarized Society in Wartime," SocArXiv wpjbz, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:wpjbz
    DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/wpjbz
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/66f9653b1b04f4a814b3f7a8/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31235/osf.io/wpjbz?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:cup:apsrev:v:64:y:1970:i:01:p:18-34_12 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Lilliana Mason, 2015. "“I Disrespectfully Agree”: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(1), pages 128-145, January.
    3. Daniel Bischof & Markus Wagner, 2019. "Do Voters Polarize When Radical Parties Enter Parliament?," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(4), pages 888-904, October.
    4. Garrett, Kristin N. & Bankert, Alexa, 2020. "The Moral Roots of Partisan Division: How Moral Conviction Heightens Affective Polarization," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(2), pages 621-640, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:osf:socarx:wpjbz_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Borbáth, Endre & Hutter, Swen & Leininger, Arndt, 2023. "Cleavage politics, polarisation and participation in Western Europe," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 46(4), pages 631-651.
    3. Mechtenberg, Lydia & Perino, Grischa & Treich, Nicolas & Tyran, Jean-Robert & Wang, Stephanie W., 2024. "Self-signaling in voting," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    4. Tanisa Tawichsri & Thiti Tosborvorn & Suparit Suwanik & Boontida Sa-ngimnet & Chonnakan Rittinon, 2022. "Misunderstood Differences: Perception, Media, and Out-Group Animosity in Thailand," PIER Discussion Papers 194, Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research, revised Nov 2025.
    5. Lydia Mechtenberg & Grischa Perino & Nicolas Treich & Jean-Robert Tyran & Stephanie Wang, 2021. "Self-Signaling in Moral Voting," Discussion Papers 21-01, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
    6. Helbling, Marc & Jungkunz, Sebastian, 2020. "Social divides in the age of globalization," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 43(6), pages 1187-1210.
    7. Benjamin Barber & Daniel J. Blake, 2024. "My kind of people: Political polarization, ideology, and firm location," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 849-874, May.
    8. Vicky Chuqiao Yang & Tamara van der Does & Henrik Olsson, 2021. "Falling through the cracks: Modeling the formation of social category boundaries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-11, March.
    9. Eugen Dimant, 2020. "Hate Trumps Love: The Impact of Political Polarization on Social Preferences," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 029, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    10. Maxime Walder & Jan Fivaz & Daniel Schwarz, 2026. "Voting Advice Applications and Their Impact on Ideological and Affective Polarization," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
    11. Elisabeth Kempf & Margarita Tsoutsoura, 2021. "Partisan Professionals: Evidence from Credit Rating Analysts," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 76(6), pages 2805-2856, December.
    12. Stone, Daniel F., 2019. "“Unmotivated bias” and partisan hostility: Empirical evidence," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 12-26.
    13. Farhart, Christina E. & Struby, Ethan, 2026. "Inflation expectations and political polarization: Evidence from the cooperative election study," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    14. Benjamin Jansen & Alois Stutzer, 2026. "Affective partisan polarization, citizens’ attitudes, and political behavior in Swiss democracy," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, Springer;Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics, vol. 162(1), pages 1-19, December.
    15. Kendrick B. Roberson, 2024. "Insidious racism and institutional constraints: evidence from national and local case studies in the United States," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    16. Shikong Luo & Alan Tidwell & Sherwood Clements, 2022. "Does Political Uncertainty Affect Residential Development?," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 65(4), pages 572-592, November.
    17. W. Ben Mccartney & John Orellana‐Li & Calvin Zhang, 2024. "Political Polarization Affects Households' Financial Decisions: Evidence from Home Sales," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 79(2), pages 795-841, April.
    18. Veronika Patkós, 2023. "Measuring partisan polarization with partisan differences in satisfaction with the government: the introduction of a new comparative approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 39-57, February.
    19. James Flamino & Alessandro Galeazzi & Stuart Feldman & Michael W. Macy & Brendan Cross & Zhenkun Zhou & Matteo Serafino & Alexandre Bovet & Hernán A. Makse & Boleslaw K. Szymanski, 2023. "Political polarization of news media and influencers on Twitter in the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(6), pages 904-916, June.
    20. Furst, Rodrigo & Goldszmidt, Rafael & Andrade, Eduardo B. & Vieites, Yan & Andretti, Bernardo & Ramos, Guilherme A., 2024. "Longitudinal attenuation in political polarization: Evidence from COVID-19 vaccination adherence in Brazil," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    21. Anna-Sophie Kurella & Salvatore Barbaro, 2024. "On the Polarization Premium for radical parties in PR electoral systems," Working Papers 2410, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:wpjbz. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://socarxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.