IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v14y2026a11236.html

Voting Advice Applications and Their Impact on Ideological and Affective Polarization

Author

Listed:
  • Maxime Walder

    (Department of Political Science and International Relations, University of Geneva, Switzerland / Department of Social Science, University of Basel, Switzerland)

  • Jan Fivaz

    (Center for Public Management, University of Bern, Switzerland)

  • Daniel Schwarz

    (Center for Public Management, University of Bern, Switzerland)

Abstract

Political polarization has been one of the most researched topics in political science over the past few years. While many scholars focus on the factors that foster ideological and affective polarization, less is known about the drivers of depolarization. In this article, we are addressing this gap by investigating the potential effects of using voting advice applications (VAAs) on both the ideological polarization of vote choice and the level of affective polarization among voters. Using data from the Swiss VAA Smartvote and from a field experiment within a two-wave panel survey conducted before and after the 2023 Swiss national election, this article presents partial evidence that using a VAA during election campaigns can contribute to a reduction in ideological and affective polarization among voters. Our findings have significant implications for the role of VAAs in increasingly polarized Western democracies.

Suggested Citation

  • Maxime Walder & Jan Fivaz & Daniel Schwarz, 2026. "Voting Advice Applications and Their Impact on Ideological and Affective Polarization," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:11236
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.11236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/11236
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.11236?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lilliana Mason, 2015. "“I Disrespectfully Agree”: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(1), pages 128-145, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tanisa Tawichsri & Thiti Tosborvorn & Suparit Suwanik & Boontida Sa-ngimnet & Chonnakan Rittinon, 2022. "Misunderstood Differences: Perception, Media, and Out-Group Animosity in Thailand," PIER Discussion Papers 194, Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research, revised Nov 2025.
    2. Helbling, Marc & Jungkunz, Sebastian, 2020. "Social divides in the age of globalization," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 43(6), pages 1187-1210.
    3. Benjamin Barber & Daniel J. Blake, 2024. "My kind of people: Political polarization, ideology, and firm location," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 849-874, May.
    4. Vicky Chuqiao Yang & Tamara van der Does & Henrik Olsson, 2021. "Falling through the cracks: Modeling the formation of social category boundaries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-11, March.
    5. Eugen Dimant, 2020. "Hate Trumps Love: The Impact of Political Polarization on Social Preferences," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 029, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    6. Elisabeth Kempf & Margarita Tsoutsoura, 2021. "Partisan Professionals: Evidence from Credit Rating Analysts," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 76(6), pages 2805-2856, December.
    7. Stone, Daniel F., 2019. "“Unmotivated bias” and partisan hostility: Empirical evidence," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 12-26.
    8. Farhart, Christina E. & Struby, Ethan, 2026. "Inflation expectations and political polarization: Evidence from the cooperative election study," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    9. repec:osf:socarx:wpjbz_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Benjamin Jansen & Alois Stutzer, 2026. "Affective partisan polarization, citizens’ attitudes, and political behavior in Swiss democracy," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, Springer;Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics, vol. 162(1), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Kendrick B. Roberson, 2024. "Insidious racism and institutional constraints: evidence from national and local case studies in the United States," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    12. Shikong Luo & Alan Tidwell & Sherwood Clements, 2022. "Does Political Uncertainty Affect Residential Development?," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 65(4), pages 572-592, November.
    13. W. Ben Mccartney & John Orellana‐Li & Calvin Zhang, 2024. "Political Polarization Affects Households' Financial Decisions: Evidence from Home Sales," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 79(2), pages 795-841, April.
    14. Veronika Patkós, 2023. "Measuring partisan polarization with partisan differences in satisfaction with the government: the introduction of a new comparative approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 39-57, February.
    15. James Flamino & Alessandro Galeazzi & Stuart Feldman & Michael W. Macy & Brendan Cross & Zhenkun Zhou & Matteo Serafino & Alexandre Bovet & Hernán A. Makse & Boleslaw K. Szymanski, 2023. "Political polarization of news media and influencers on Twitter in the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(6), pages 904-916, June.
    16. Furst, Rodrigo & Goldszmidt, Rafael & Andrade, Eduardo B. & Vieites, Yan & Andretti, Bernardo & Ramos, Guilherme A., 2024. "Longitudinal attenuation in political polarization: Evidence from COVID-19 vaccination adherence in Brazil," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    17. Anna-Sophie Kurella & Salvatore Barbaro, 2024. "On the Polarization Premium for radical parties in PR electoral systems," Working Papers 2410, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
    18. Kimmo Eriksson & Irina Vartanova & Pontus Strimling, 2024. "A cultural evolution theory for contemporary polarization trends in moral opinions," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    19. Duran Fiack, 2022. "Governing for resilience: a new epoch in U.S. environmental policy and politics?," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(1), pages 43-80, March.
    20. Benjamin Ogden, 2017. "The Imperfect Beliefs Voting Model," Working Papers ECARES ECARES 2017-20, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    21. Dieter Dekeyser & Henk Roose, 2022. "Polarizing policy opinions with conflict framed information: activating negative views of political parties in a multi-party system," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1121-1138, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:11236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.