IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/fd97a_v2.html

Seeing Amsterdam through Google Maps: Uneven visibility and crowd-based mapping

Author

Listed:
  • Shaker, Reza Ardekani
  • Uitermark, Justus

Abstract

How is the city represented and shaped through Google Maps? Through a computational analysis of over 106,000 places in Amsterdam, this paper examines how Google Maps represents and creates urban hierarchies and differences. Drawing on critical cartography and platform studies, we examine how Google Maps’ affordances and modes of crowd-sourced data collection generate uneven platform geographies: consumption-oriented places, scenes, and neighbourhoods stand out while others are pushed to the background. However, we also show that Google Maps intervenes into processes of segregation and gentrification in complex ways; we do not find straightforward platform-promoted displacement. Through a granular analysis of one street, we show that there are synergistic connections between places that may seem to be in competition and that different communities use Google Maps to appraise the street in culturally specific ways. Both our city-wide and street-level analyses demonstrate that Google Maps functions as a constitutive urban infrastructure that creates platform geographies by spawning hierarchies of visibility and marking differences.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaker, Reza Ardekani & Uitermark, Justus, 2026. "Seeing Amsterdam through Google Maps: Uneven visibility and crowd-based mapping," SocArXiv fd97a_v2, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:fd97a_v2
    DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/fd97a_v2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6a74b5b2f0e540ab363c735d/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31235/osf.io/fd97a_v2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antoine Courmont, 2025. "Locked in a data imperative? French local businesses faced with Google Maps," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 62(13), pages 2687-2705, October.
    2. Emil van Eck & Iris Hagemans & Jan Rath, 2020. "The ambiguity of diversity: Management of ethnic and class transitions in a gentrifying local shopping street," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(16), pages 3299-3314, December.
    3. Monica Degen & Gillian Rose, 2024. "Conceptualising aesthetic power in the digitally-mediated city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(11), pages 2176-2192, August.
    4. Laure Guimbail, 2025. "Navigating frictions in digital urbanism: Google Maps, public transportation and collaborative data-driven mobility governance," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 62(13), pages 2652-2669, October.
    5. Irene Bronsvoort & Justus L Uitermark, 2022. "Seeing the street through Instagram. Digital platforms and the amplification of gentrification," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(14), pages 2857-2874, November.
    6. José van Dijck & Thomas Poell, 2013. "Understanding Social Media Logic," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(1), pages 2-14.
    7. Mark Graham & Matthew Zook, 2013. "Augmented Realities and Uneven Geographies: Exploring the Geolinguistic Contours of the Web," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(1), pages 77-99, January.
    8. Wanda J. Orlikowski & Susan V. Scott, 2014. "What Happens When Evaluation Goes Online? Exploring Apparatuses of Valuation in the Travel Sector," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 868-891, June.
    9. José van Dijck & Thomas Poell, 2013. "Understanding Social Media Logic," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(1), pages 2-14.
    10. Orlikowski, Wanda J. & Scott, Susan V., 2014. "What happens when evaluation goes online? Exploring apparatuses of valuation in the travel sector," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 57602, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Orlikowski, Wanda J. & Scott, Susan V., 2023. "The digital undertow and institutional displacement: a sociomaterial approach," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119271, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shaker, Reza Ardekani & Uitermark, Justus, 2026. "The City Multiple: Comparing Geographies of Digital Visibility across Google Maps, Instagram, Facebook, and TikTok," SocArXiv v6pmr_v1, Center for Open Science.
    2. Karunakaran, Arvind & Orlikowski, Wanda J. & Scott, Susan V., 2022. "Crowd-based accountability: examining how social media commentary reconfigures organizational accountability," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 114401, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Valentina Mucunska Palevska & Blagica Novkovska, 2018. "The Participation Of Ict In Activities Of Economic Subjects In Small Economy," UTMS Journal of Economics, University of Tourism and Management, Skopje, Macedonia, vol. 9(2), pages 157-168.
    4. Zhewei Zhang & Youngjin Yoo & Kalle Lyytinen & Aron Lindberg, 2021. "The Unknowability of Autonomous Tools and the Liminal Experience of Their Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1192-1213, December.
    5. Olive, Mattia Vincenzo & Gastaldi, Luca & Appio, Francesco Paolo, 2026. "Relational coordination in medical work: The role of digital health practices," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    6. Alex J. Wood, 2021. "Algorithmic Management: Consequences for Work Organisation and Working Conditions," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2021-07, Joint Research Centre.
    7. Franck Aggeri, 2017. "How can performativity contribute to management and organization research? Theoretical perspectives and analytical framework [Qu'est-ce que la performativité peut apporter aux recherches en management et sur les organisations ? Mise en perspective," Post-Print hal-01609172, HAL.
    8. Emiliana Armano & Marco Briziarelli & Elisabetta Risi, 2024. "L?emergere dell?istruzione mediata da piattaforme digitali. Critica Delle retoriche dominanti a partire da una ricerca sul campo," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2024(2), pages 143-162.
    9. Dolata, Ulrich, 2017. "Social movements and the Internet: The sociotechnical constitution of collective action," Research Contributions to Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies, SOI Discussion Papers 2017-02, University of Stuttgart, Institute for Social Sciences, Department of Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies.
    10. Matt Beane & Wanda J. Orlikowski, 2015. "What Difference Does a Robot Make? The Material Enactment of Distributed Coordination," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 1553-1573, December.
    11. Metz, Ashley & Hartley, Paul, 2020. "Scenario development as valuation: Opportunities for reflexivity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    12. Nicola Righetti & Niccolò Bertuzzi, 2025. "Rethinking Veganism in the Digital Age. Innovating Methodology and Typology to Explore a Decade of Facebook Discourses," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 30(1), pages 96-115, March.
    13. Alaimo, Cristina & Kallinikos, Jannis, 2022. "Organizations decentered: data objects, technology and knowledge," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112470, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Jacob Groshek & Sarah Krongard, 2016. "Netflix and Engage? Implications for Streaming Television on Political Participation during the 2016 US Presidential Campaign," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-18, October.
    15. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/5fb16v625i8vdbgdiskfbht5i5 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Xiang Zhou & Yonghong Dai & Liuyuang Qian, 2026. "Motivated to Communicate: A Resource-Based Perspective on Chinese SMEs’ Social Media Use for International Outreach," SAGE Open, , vol. 16(2), pages 21582440251, June.
    17. Ziliang Deng & Peter W Liesch & Zeyu Wang, 2021. "Deceptive signaling on globalized digital platforms: Institutional hypnosis and firm internationalization," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(6), pages 1096-1120, August.
    18. Russ, Meir, 2016. "The probable foundations of sustainabilism: Information, energy and entropy based definition of capital, Homo Sustainabiliticus and the need for a “new gold”," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 328-338.
    19. Maha Shaikh & Emmanuelle Vaast, 2023. "Algorithmic Interactions in Open Source Work," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 744-765, June.
    20. Patrick Gregori & Patrick Holzmann, 2022. "Entrepreneurial practices and the constitution of environmental value for sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3302-3317, November.
    21. Rong, Ke & Sun, Hui & Li, Dun & Zhou, Di, 2021. "Matching as Service Provision of Sharing Economy Platforms: An Information Processing Perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:fd97a_v2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://socarxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.